Models choice or ETV policy

I am sure that models do exactly what want, owners, managers, directors, etv.I see this clear and many others here see the same but they dont care anymore. Many people dont post anymore something against etv and defenders etv because will have problem with their membership. We are free to say what we want i supose or? I dont like their strategy you like their strategy and this is all. We have the same rights or mabe no?

kyke50 wrote:

kolokotronis wrote:You can see clear in the last shower show that Kate take orders from cameraman ,or director what to do. I dont believe that models take any decision. If goes softer tonight you really believe thats her decision.This is etv strategy because tonight will be many sms about Kate to make the same like yestarday. Unfortunatly there are people who dont understand their games yet.

Was it also the order of the director who made Chelsea in their first nightshow?
Sorry, maybe I'm naive but I prefer to believe in people and want think that Kate is free to decide.
Order of the director?
Free choice of model?
I do not know if anyone has the real answer.

My advice, take [hidden link - please register] thread.

kolokotronis wrote:Kyke50

I have the ansewr for you. Some months ago was in their site a viewers cam where can see clear who give orders.Everything control director"s. I am so sorry about that

Vicky got several requests for a shower in the last years and she was never in the shower.
But of course you are sure that she was last night in the shower, or?

Kyke50

I have the ansewr for you. Some months ago was in their site a viewers cam where can see clear who give orders.Everything control director"s. I am so sorry about that

kolokotronis wrote:You can see clear in the last shower show that Kate take orders from cameraman ,or director what to do. I dont believe that models take any decision. If goes softer tonight you really believe thats her decision.This is etv strategy because tonight will be many sms about Kate to make the same like yestarday. Unfortunatly there are people who dont understand their games yet.

Was it also the order of the director who made Chelsea in their first nightshow?
Sorry, maybe I'm naive but I prefer to believe in people and want think that Kate is free to decide.
Order of the director?
Free choice of model?
I do not know if anyone has the real answer.

I just remember an old Sigmund Freud quote.
The great question which I have not been able to answer, despite my 30 years of research into the feminine soul, is "what does a woman want"?

The performance of Brona in the evening show fuels my belief that all (well most) including the so called soft models are generally willing to get more revealing. So why doesnt this happen?

Well it could be a matter of policy were some models are not allowed to show more. This would explain some bogus explanations from some models as to why they cannot do something. It would also explain, I think, the unwillingness of some girls to perform in the nightshow because if you are willing to show more but you are not allowed to, having to lie about it is a drag.

Maybe there is also some practical issue for a girl to go from a general willingness to the actual nakedness in the shape of a hurdle of sudden insecurity. I feel I have seen this insecurity as seemingly a very nervous permance by girls in their first nightshow but sometimes also with girls who have already been more revealing. This hurdle could come into play becasue of a variety of reasons:
- it's her first time
- a bad hairday
- no whistling from the boys at the construction site
- a careless remark from someone about her appearance
- not the perfect shoes for the outfit
- a fight with a friend over a banana (or something really serious of course)
- when she asked "does this make me look fat" her boyfriend said only "no" while she had hoped he would say "you are the most beatifull woman in the world"
- instead to the same question he said "you are the most beautifull woman in the world" and now she thinks he lied to spare her feelings
- there could be a milion others

Some girls overcome this hurdle by just taking it al off like undressing before you go to bed, this makes for a poor show and I'd prefer the girl to stay dressed.

This insecurity could also be overcome by some good mood creation in the studio and a considerate and patient caller and camera. What do you think? Did my countless hours of whatching Sex and the City to understand more about women pay off, or was all my agony and torture a lost cause?

Mr_Niceguy wrote:After the show Gia put on last night it seems pretty clear to me that her earlier non showing is not because she has a problem with showing more. This must all be part of the "every kind of woman for every kind of taste" policy (so some women will show all and some don't). Ofcourse this is done to attract a wider range of audience.
If this applies to Gia maybe it applies to all, including the soft models.

Or am I jumping to conclusions a little to fast here?

Yes, probably to fast.
Models are free to show more. It is their choice.
ETV staff can oblige then to show less.
ETV director can show a model, do a focus or ignore her.

The tastes of the viewers are various, so the choice of models and the way to film them must be various too.

After the show Gia put on last night it seems pretty clear to me that her earlier non showing is not because she has a problem with showing more. This must all be part of the "every kind of woman for every kind of taste" policy (so some women will show all and some don't). Ofcourse this is done to attract a wider range of audience.
If this applies to Gia maybe it applies to all, including the soft models.

Or am I jumping to conclusions a little to fast here?

Well thanks for your comment so far.
But the question remains why not show a girl who is doing a hot show. For instance Lia was just doing a great show. The camera was al over the place but not on her. Was this an agreement with her? Because if she can attract more callers naked but she isn;t shown and therefore doesn't get them she is loosing money. Or is this a flawed conclusion?

Yeah really nice ass Lia has!

Obviously they read my post and corrected their previous mistake. Unexpected, but very welcome

HvB wrote:It's the models choice how far she goes.
It's the directors/vision mixers choice how much they show.

I think that this answers 80% of this topic.
Of course attention given to girls by camera/director is a very powerful motivation or discouragement tool - why should anyone call model that can barely be seen?
Also voting on this site (callers feedback) surely affects management and girls of ETV - up to some extent.
Some models are very hot, but tits-squeezer Gia rules list.

It's the models choice how far she goes.
It's the directors/vision mixers choice how much they show.

I agree with some of the bits you have wrote. But i also think that the reason models get cut off is because it becomes more of a tease and causes frustration to the viewer which then causes them to what on the hope that next time they wont cut away. Gia is a perfect example of this. She maybe get one good show in a month where the camera men/regie give her the chance to do a hot show. But until that day happens you get kept hanging on a thread. As annoying as this is, this is my view on things.