| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
Gia's pool show (2012) and Ava's dinner show (09.01.13).   You have a good taste Bull.  And it seems, you like fish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In a few words:
ETV is clearly cheating all the newbies and zappers who know nothing about the background of what ETV calls "premium" or "exclusive" shows. These shows are just experiments or artistic tries of the so called "art directors". In most cases a total failure.   Only 2 shows (in 2 years!!) were a full success in my eyes: Gia's pool show (2012) and Ava's dinner show (09.01.13). The rest (although with some pretty girls) were heavily spoiled by 1. pixellation 2. bad light 3. low resolution 4. fog 5. censorship 6. fast camera movements etc etc etc etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I fully agree with Vector. Dreamlander, i agree in how great is Jade, i like her a lot. I could watch Jade show and in my opinion there is nothing memorable in it, and i think it´s very far from her best performances. She was lying in that couch all the show, almost without moving, basically we only could see her tits, shots taken from behind her head nothing about legs, ass and pussy. Her full body was only showed from very far and there was zoom only for her face and her tits, and nothing more. This is very far for my standard of a good show, but slow, poor, soft and boring, and i think almost the same for all the premium shows made this week until now (didn´t see nothing today).I know tastes are different, and also opinions. That´s why i respect so much your opinion
p.s.: the 5 credits premium show made in a Caravaggio basement was even worst, honestly. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dreamlander wrote:vector wrote:I accept your opinion Dreamlander. Then you have been very lucky with the Jade show. What I saw this week was just scrap. Models in the semi-dark on a couch. Models are moving in slow motion and show nothing erotic. Or, they hide behind some objects. But even worse is when girls give the effort and the director or the management destroys any show. |
|
|
|
|
|
vector wrote:I accept your opinion Dreamlander. Fair enough, each to their own, as they say.  I am an unashamed 'fanboy'! lol! For the right girls! If you were lucky enough to see Jade's last Premum show, I think everybody on the planet would be happy with that! It's amazing the difference it makes when the girl likes the director...but that's an entirely different can of worms to open! Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
|
Dreamlander wrote:Wilsonsand wrote:In my opinion this week DPS have a very very low quality, very little nudity, very often camera too far, the time of the shows behind that blurry-transparent screen are bad focused, and that huge vase is disturbing there, the models lye most of the times and the camera chose the more shy, soft angles and position....very very poor shows. Yesterday Sharlette made a complete joke. No nudity until 13,50 min, after that she showed her breasts one minute, then she lied upside down but panties on the last 2 minutes avoiding to see anything from her but her face and her back. So, 1 credit for one minute of Sharlette tits (not even closeups) you can see for free on night show with much more details and for more time. A joke. I accept your opinion Dreamlander. Everyone has a different taste. And who has a favorite model would pay for this model if she wears a winter coat. I am not one of the people prefer a model. I want performence for money. If I buy gas from a supplier, then I want is my heater warm. And if I buy from a supplier Electric Power then I want my light comes on when I press the switch. Now we come to the models. If I pay money to a erotic provider then I expect a naked girl. Everything else is cheating. That's why I'm with Wilson fully agree. Why should I pay money for a fully clothed girl sitting most of the time in the dark? I'll pay for this week only for Leila Premium. Because I want to know how she does. And then I'll wait until the Facebook and Google+ groups say it is worth again to buy premium shows. If they do not want my money, it is their own fault. At the moment they can not offer me what worth to buying. vector |
|
|
|
|
|
Wilsonsand wrote:In my opinion this week DPS have a very very low quality, very little nudity, very often camera too far, the time of the shows behind that blurry-transparent screen are bad focused, and that huge vase is disturbing there, the models lye most of the times and the camera chose the more shy, soft angles and position....very very poor shows. Yesterday Sharlette made a complete joke. No nudity until 13,50 min, after that she showed her breasts one minute, then she lied upside down but panties on the last 2 minutes avoiding to see anything from her but her face and her back. So, 1 credit for one minute of Sharlette tits (not even closeups) you can see for free on night show with much more details and for more time. A joke. Well, I can only comment on Alice's and Jade's shows, and I know I'm biased , but they were very good. Great picture quality with pin-sharp close-ups, a steady camera(s) and the usual nudity, done with these girl's trademark level of style and class. I haven't seen any others this week but, generally, these girls do some of the best Premiums consistently anyway.Oh, I did see Lina's shows too this morning, recorded because I was at work. Now, everyone has differing opinions on 'soft' models in the DPS but, whatever her level of performance, I think she's stunning, with a very fit body and she turns me on. I'm no prude, the level of nudity or explicitness is obviously of some importance but I won't watch a show that is guaranteed to have nudity or explicit content in it if I don't find the girl attractive.Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
|
In my opinion this week DPS have a very very low quality, very little nudity, very often camera too far, the time of the shows behind that blurry-transparent screen are bad focused, and that huge vase is disturbing there, the models lye most of the times and the camera chose the more shy, soft angles and position....very very poor shows. Yesterday Sharlette made a complete joke. No nudity until 13,50 min, after that she showed her breasts one minute, then she lied upside down but panties on the last 2 minutes avoiding to see anything from her but her face and her back. So, 1 credit for one minute of Sharlette tits (not even closeups) you can see for free on night show with much more details and for more time. A joke.
About the premium of last night: well, 4 fantastic models but the shows was absolutely ruined by the poor lightning AGAIN. What kind of problem have this people of ETV with the lightning? Some moments, there was a lot of darkness,and sometimes was almost impossible even to see their faces with so poor lightning and the shadows. A show absolutely ruined, what a pity.
|
|
|
|
Watcher wrote:Wilsonsand wrote:the fact that ""... TGE reserves the right to edit any messages ..."" doesn´t mean that manipulating (call it editing if you prefer) something written from a viewer to change intentionally the meaning is something right or a good praxis. They lied first, they manipulated the message, and after that and when the Personal Account manager said to me "I will keep you in touch" she lied again failing to her own words. Is that legal? yes, of course, is it a good behaviour? i think not. Something to be applauded? i think not. To me there are no excuses and there is no justification, sorry. I agree with watcher well put |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilsonsand wrote:the fact that ""... TGE reserves the right to edit any messages ..."" doesn´t mean that manipulating (call it editing if you prefer) something written from a viewer to change intentionally the meaning is something right or a good praxis. They lied first, they manipulated the message, and after that and when the Personal Account manager said to me "I will keep you in touch" she lied again failing to her own words. Is that legal? yes, of course, is it a good behaviour? i think not. Something to be applauded? i think not. To me there are no excuses and there is no justification, sorry. I fail to see what you are trying to achieve with this continual commentary. I believe we are all aware of how ETV operate. It's their Show, their Wall, their Rules and their Game. If you don't like it, don't play it ... And that's the point. It's an entertainment game, give 'em what they want and they'll keep coming back ... even if it's just to complain. |
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that ""... TGE reserves the right to edit any messages ..."" doesn´t mean that manipulating (call it editing if you prefer) something written from a viewer to change intentionally the meaning is something right or a good praxis. They lied first, they manipulated the message, and after that and when the Personal Account manager said to me "I will keep you in touch" she lied again failing to her own words. Is that legal? yes, of course, is it a good behaviour? i think not. Something to be applauded? i think not. To me there are no excuses and there is no justification, sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tarl_Cabot wrote:Watcher wrote:"NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES" "Published posts are free of charge for logged-in viewers! " I am not condoning their behaviour, merely pointing out that, in their Terms and Conditions, that they expressly say that they may do this. It's all entertainment, expecting serious discussion on The Wall is rather naive ... |
|
|
|
|
|
Watcher wrote:"NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES" and they keep the right to take a credit for a post at the wall, or? if this is still so everyone will have to confirm that its an arsehole behaviour from etv towards its customers. taking money for publishing its own opinion is shit and also without taking money for posts at the Wall is a wall with only edited posts pure nonsense. |
|
|
|
|
hi guys did kat stripped in her two shows in DPS this night ??? thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES"
"... TGE reserves the right to edit any messages ..." Get over it! 
|
|
|
