| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
slava64 wrote:brudgon wrote:excuse me slava if i quote your post but alleluja? i can't record etv tonight i use rtmpdump and since last night worked well...but today and tonight don't work....others channels works well with rtmpdump |
|
|
|
|
|
brudgon wrote:excuse me slava if i quote your post but alleluja? i can't record etv tonight My friend Brudgon tell me please what program you are using for record video and maybe I can help you 
|
|
|
|
|
|
slava64 wrote:Alleluia again!!! excuse me slava if i quote your post but alleluja? i can't record etv tonight  and i don't know why
|
|
|
|
|
|
slava64 wrote:Alleluia again!!! well, it means 620 Mb per hour or 3,1 Gb for an 5 hour nightshow.  And I was waiting for hotter content with close ups, better light and girls which don't move too fast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
bellerophon wrote:I'm no expert, but the TV picture via HB or Astra doesn't look HD (well not like my BBC/$ky HD anyway), and it is not showing up on my receiver's info as HD either. And even on this HD stream via the web, there is something strangely washed out and pale about all the colours, not just the studio's background grey, green and purple. Matches Wimbledon's colours nicely though, except for the crisp whites and the strawberries..this matches my impression: they blew up the size without adapting the signal quality for satellite. The new 'basement' studio, bad contrast and a somehow blurry picture with 'Wimbledon colors' (even of the skin) ... too bad they seem to concentrate on the web and small devices only - webstream quality may be perfect for tablets and notebooks but most of the viewers are watching ETV on flatscreen tv with much more than double the size of a notebook screen. So  for the changes on [hidden link - please register] and  for the changes on fta channel so far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh no. Than we have again this Disney World Shows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
today they are testing chroma again...
 i fear next week chroma shows again
|
|
|
|
|
|
that is because its only HD on the stream. having a Satellite sending in HD would cost a lot of money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
vector wrote:Dreamlander wrote:15 minutes...it's not a huge amount of time...in the hands of the right girl it seems to fly past in the blink of an eye...but...can the 'button pushers' give us a fault-free stream for this short amount of time?...can they f*ck! Alice's second show was stunning!  Also, the stream was perfect and the show was 17m30s long, so, if that was some sort of apology, then to whoever did that, it was a welcome bonus! Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
|
Alleluia again!!!
It's incredible! ETV has reached today a new level video high-resolution HD 1280x720 pixels 25fps 1280 kbps! [hidden link - please register] The picture is clear and distortion-free as never been before! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dreamlander wrote:15 minutes...it's not a huge amount of time...in the hands of the right girl it seems to fly past in the blink of an eye...but...can the 'button pushers' give us a fault-free stream for this short amount of time?...can they f*ck! A friend told me that they are having technical problems since the second Ginger show today. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 minutes...it's not a huge amount of time...in the hands of the right girl it seems to fly past in the blink of an eye...but...can the 'button pushers' give us a fault-free stream for this short amount of time?...can they f*ck!
 Alice was about 13 minutes into her show and it was beautiful, so sweet, sexy and sensual, her trademarks...but then...the stream stopped...the black info bar came across the screen and 30 seconds later, the 'play' button appeared as usual . Totally destroying any sense of eroticism Alice was creating so effectively! Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
|
The stream it's self is much better on my laptop!! fuzziness
has gone!! actually It's a pretty good Image!!........But yes the dreaded White Circle is coming up a lot more often than what it should do! It's really very annoying! Regards
|
|
|
|
|
|
have some members problems with the stream now? i have the usual white circle in the middle of the screen
|
|
|
|
|
|
alex wrote:vector wrote:25 fps is the minimum. 30 fps would be better. Then you can better see the Mumu in slow motion. With this compromise I can live well, Alex.
|
|
|
