Author | Posts |
---|---|
Premium Shows Made by ETV is only Bored Shows for the Member !
|
|
|
|
vector wrote:25 fps is the minimum. 30 fps would be better. Then you can better see the Mumu in slow motion. 25 fps for the daytime shows and 30 fps in the night... |
|
|
|
brokingbull wrote:vector wrote:brokingbull wrote:slava64 wrote:Alleluia !!! I am in full agreement, Bull. So you can write it on the wall. Maybe they are grateful for your suggestions. |
|
|
|
vector wrote:brokingbull wrote:slava64 wrote:Alleluia !!! This bulgarian kittycat ("mumu") needs more: 1. best light 2. no fast movements 3. more attention and care of camerapeople 4. more true fans Then this rare animal can survive. |
|
|
|
brokingbull wrote:slava64 wrote:Alleluia !!! 25 fps is the minimum. 30 fps would be better. Then you can better see the Mumu in slow motion. |
|
|
|
slava64 wrote:Alleluia !!! 20 fps is way too low, should be 25 fps! |
|
|
|
Videot wrote:Sorry, but the edges are still pixelated and movements are still blurry. The stream output numbers don't matter if the camera input is bad. And it is.(Have a look at the texts on the plasma in the studio for a permanent example, if you are too mesmerized by the models to note that their contours are very unsharp - in the example picture, look at the edges of Saya's top...) I agree with you, Videot! But click on a both images, please and feel the difference, which is very noticeable .........................................720x404.............................................................................864x486................................... [hidden link - please register] or [hidden link - please register] ........................................yesterday...............................................................................today...................................... We can't demand from ETV a lot at once, well at least while they seek to improve their product |
|
|
|
slava64 wrote:Alleluia !!! Sorry, but the edges are still pixelated and movements are still blurry. The stream output numbers don't matter if the camera input is bad. And it is.(Have a look at the texts on the plasma in the studio for a permanent example, if you are too mesmerized by the models to note that their contours are very unsharp - in the example picture, look at the edges of Saya's top...) |
|
|
|
Alleluia !!!
They heard us! Web Stream ETV increased the resolution unto really HQ right now, finally! We have now: flv 864x486 pixels 20fps 1536kbps 16:9 (as I wanted: [hidden link - please register] I say thank a lot for team ETV! My pain and suffering due to bad quality run out! [hidden link - please register] |
|
|
|
good morning guys,.... I have just posted a message on etv wall
expressing my displeasure of the live streaming on the internet ( my only access ) I wasn't unpleasant!! but put my point over about the awful quality of the streaming ie fuzziness It will be interestjng to see if they show it somehow I don't expect them to but I think I made my point, cheers!! |
|
|
|
ETV 16:9!!
Now we can see ETV with better picture on satellite tv (Astra) than the web streaming!! The next step is HD!! |
|
|
|
I hope and think they will correct the problem. anyway, I have no understanding for the current bad quality. some of us (including me) bought credits... this is very unprofessional!
|
|
|
|
malmaisons wrote:as always they need time to get things right. It may help to post on their wall but we have to accept that they are not as professional as Sky or similar providers. Without improving the bitrate it will be difficult to get a decent picture - perhaps they don't want to spend money on a quality stream. This way smartphones seem to be the appropriate device - time to throw away your big flatscreen If they don't fix the quality I rather throw away my Etvshow password. |
|
|
|
as always they need time to get things right. It may help to post on their wall but we have to accept that they are not as professional as Sky or similar providers. Without improving the bitrate it will be difficult to get a decent picture - perhaps they don't want to spend money on a quality stream. This way smartphones seem to be the appropriate device - time to throw away your big flatscreen
|
|
|
|
If etv do not do something about this unacceptable quality of streaming
I for one will be watching a lot less and spending less credits!! the quality of streaming must alter .or are we stuck with It!!??: |
|
|