Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

Exactly mate I've just sent you a PM on it. I almost fell off my seat laughing when I read the comments........so glad I don't post there anymore as I'd be fucking embarrassed to still have any association with what used to be a very good forum but is now just a fucking dump full of fanboys and bullshitters

Read This If You Want A Laugh

Yes i thought the hype Flick got on other forums was over the top, her nightshow was ok but it was nothing special, perhaps people were just happy to see a new face, personally she isn't my type but i will give her credit for doing a nightshow, i wish some of my favorite daybabes had the guts to do a nightshow

I thought I might just add too that if ever Felicity Hill is to do another nightshow she needs to improve massively from her debut show. Babestation needs girls who are willing to put in a proper nightshow, one thing they don't need is any more tease shows. It's killing the channels from Babestation and beyond.

Tonight's line up looks very promising with Amanda, Jada, Jenna and Sophie hopefully providing the thrills. the other 2 Alice and Candy I'm not expecting anything great from so the onus is really on the 4 babes I've mentioned. With the right producer and cameramen it has all the ingredients to be a success but yet they'll still find some way to fuck it up!

That was a better performance by Jenna last night as she hasn't really been at her best in recent weeks, but she is a stunning babe and is one of my favorites on BS

As for Jada although she gets naked she is far too static for my liking

EJKKPT wrote:The current, abysmal state of the babe channels, and in particular BS, is nothing to do with prudishness, or Ofcom - lets face it, even Ofcom would be hard pressed to find anything to moan about, so lame are the shows, now.

No, its commercial decisions by the broadcasters that are to blame for this sorry state of affairs.

Now, this might seem contradictory, after all, the raison d'etre of the channels is to make money, so why piss off viewers, and therefore potential customers, but the reality is that, as the shows have tamed down over the years (initially due to Ofcom censorship, and the broadcasters' failure to challenge them), it has resulted in fewer viewers/potential customers, and an inevitable loss of revenue. You'd think at that stage that any sane individual would think 'fuck this', Ofcom have compromised our product to such an extent that we have no option but to seek a legal judgement on their censorship, but no, instead, the broadcasters started focussing on selling products (pics., videos, website consent/online only shows etc.), and in doing so, have deliberately offered less and less on the FTA shows, to 'encourage' people towards the paid for content; this has reached a massive new low with the arrival of pervcam, which has resulted in a near total focus on this particular product, to the near complete detriment of the FTA product i.e. the babe channels themselves.

It doesn't matter who the babe is, they are employees, and simply do what they are told (within the limits of what they are able/willing to do as a performer); if all the producer is going to allow the cameramen to show is their upper half, and at times recently it's become little more than 'head and shoulders', what is the babe supposed to do? Yes, there are babes around these days who are lazy (doing little more than sit/stand, looking bored/uninterested, barely moving etc.), Lori (for example, and whether you like her or not), is not one of them, so when her shows are reduced to being unwatchable (for her fans), you know things have got really, REALLY bad.

This is an excellent post, and everything you say about the shows I agree with. I have expressed these same sentiments a lot of times - in regards to the commercialization of Babestation being to the deliberate detriment of the shows themselves... You are also correct that there is very little that the girls can do when it is their employers who dictate terms... But in regards to Lori herself - who has been without question my absolute favourite performer over the years (no one else even comes close to Lori, for me, that's how much I like her) - it is very evident that she herself endorses these lame camera-upper-body-half pathetic shows precisely because the pervcam is not to her liking. She clearly does not want the camera intruding where she herself is unprepared to show. Some of the other girls are the same in this. That is why whilst pervcam remains the likes of Lori's shows will be forever dead. She will always be happy for the camera to be up top. We cannot blame her for this, that is just how she is. She will only ever perform when that camera is not in operation!! The girls that are prepared to do pervcam properly obviously won't ever make a fuss if the camera ever went below (which it very rarely ever does). But the likes of Lori will be asking for the cameramen to stay well above, or legs will remain FIRMLY closed. And this is really the crux of the problem since pervcam has been introduced. I mean, who is going to pay for pervcam if it is blatantly obvious that the girls are keeping everything well and truly covered? This is why a performer like Lori will encourage this lameass camerawork - whilst pervcam remains - because going below will only reveal their actual reluctance; hence damaging their profits.

God only knows where Gina went to. All I know is that she once talked about setting up a sports club business and maybe that's what she's trying to establish' If that's her dream, then I wish her every success in her endeavours, although I miss her on Babestation and on Studio 66 greatly and it's sad she isn't on our screens any more.

hey mate, I did see Sophie last week but because my interest is waning there is a real possibility that I might have missed her session as I tend to switch back to the mainstream channels more and more these nights, in saying that there is also a good chance that I was sidetracked as I've had a lot of things lately in the real world to take care of so I'm not always on the ball with regards to all the sessions. I shall keep an eye on Sophie Hart next time she is on and hope that the cameraman affords her the grace to put on a performance.

With regards to tonight's shows, although far from perfect I do agree with you that the cameramen weren't such dickheads which has normally been the case. Perhaps one of the reps from Babestation does indeed read the forums for feedback so if our posts are having an effect on the long term impact of the channel then the power of the internet might yet prevail and yes Jada and Gina (whatever happened to her) are real babes

Thanks for your nice acknowledgement, Scottishbloke. I agree that Jada is not moving as much as she usually does, but I'm of the opinion as long as she is in the nude, moving or still is good enough for me as she is one of my all time favourites along with Georgie Serino, Amanda and her sis Caty Cole, Lori and Sophie Hart. Incidentally, did you catch Sophie's performance on Babestation the other week? She was outstanding, I'm also pleased the cameraman behaved himself by filming the whole of her in the nude most of the time.

Thanks for the compliment Rallkin123, I also very much enjoying your posts too as you bring a lot of really good points to the table Yeah Jenna has her panties off now, we've only got an hour and a bit of the show to go, let's hope to fuck that we get at least one good session tonight as the night so far hasn't been very good. It looks like Amanda has been censored to fuck

Jada is also nude but she isn't getting into any interesting positions yet, I like the flexible Jada, not the static one

The lovely Jenna nude. More please, your gorgeousness. Let's hope Amanda and Jada do the same.

EJKKPT and Scottishbloke, every word you both say I concur. I now believe that most babes DO want to put in a good performance when they're on screen but are limited in what they can show, initially Ofcom and now the emphasis on the commercialization having put paid to that! I CANNOT find fault in your arguments about the shows of late. Surely by alienating the viewers(and potential customers), won't be good for them in the long run.

The current, abysmal state of the babe channels, and in particular BS, is nothing to do with prudishness, or Ofcom - lets face it, even Ofcom would be hard pressed to find anything to moan about, so lame are the shows, now.

No, its commercial decisions by the broadcasters that are to blame for this sorry state of affairs.

Now, this might seem contradictory, after all, the raison d'etre of the channels is to make money, so why piss off viewers, and therefore potential customers, but the reality is that, as the shows have tamed down over the years (initially due to Ofcom censorship, and the broadcasters' failure to challenge them), it has resulted in fewer viewers/potential customers, and an inevitable loss of revenue. You'd think at that stage that any sane individual would think 'fuck this', Ofcom have compromised our product to such an extent that we have no option but to seek a legal judgement on their censorship, but no, instead, the broadcasters started focussing on selling products (pics., videos, website consent/online only shows etc.), and in doing so, have deliberately offered less and less on the FTA shows, to 'encourage' people towards the paid for content; this has reached a massive new low with the arrival of pervcam, which has resulted in a near total focus on this particular product, to the near complete detriment of the FTA product i.e. the babe channels themselves.

It doesn't matter who the babe is, they are employees, and simply do what they are told (within the limits of what they are able/willing to do as a performer); if all the producer is going to allow the cameramen to show is their upper half, and at times recently it's become little more than 'head and shoulders', what is the babe supposed to do? Yes, there are babes around these days who are lazy (doing little more than sit/stand, looking bored/uninterested, barely moving etc.), Lori (for example, and whether you like her or not), is not one of them, so when her shows are reduced to being unwatchable (for her fans), you know things have got really, REALLY bad.

[hidden image - please register]

Scottishbloke wrote:Yes exactly, I have see a real decline in the brutally honest forum member these days, I am however very pleased to see a lot more interaction back on this Thread as it was virtually dead a year ago. What can you say about last nights show other than what has already been said in previous posts. It was simply a fucking embarrassment and a disgrace to the channels. Absolute fucking amateurs, I really hope that the calls do dry up too, that way Babestation will have no alternative but to take the feedback on board. Perhaps a few other members can also bring themselves to voice an opinion on the state of the channels

Positive wrote:There was a time when some used to engage and interact on babe forums, but I have not seen that for a long time. The likelihood is that public opinion still filters through to them, but unless takings begin to drastically drop they remain immune to criticisms.

Yes exactly, I have see a real decline in the brutally honest forum member these days, I am however very pleased to see a lot more interaction back on this Thread as it was virtually dead a year ago. What can you say about last nights show other than what has already been said in previous posts. It was simply a fucking embarrassment and a disgrace to the channels. Absolute fucking amateurs, I really hope that the calls do dry up too, that way Babestation will have no alternative but to take the feedback on board. Perhaps a few other members can also bring themselves to voice an opinion on the state of the channels

This regime at Babestation is as petty-minded as it gets.