Eurotic TV - General Discussion

Hi Watcher-hope you are well. So you see no justification in my last comment---well I see no justification in taking money from a caller and not showing the model they are talking to as happened last night and every show she has been in. I can assure you that models soon get fed up working hard for 6 hours and end up getting a few minutes of air time. A few more shows like last night and her thoughts will turn to leaving. Its happened before and will happen again

uk334 wrote:Ten models tonight, four too many. We will see if it gets interesting.
Sad thing is, the ETV set up can be so much better if they just listened to viewers opinions

well, maybe I can help you.
When you are willing to compensate the missing income, they are surely willing to give you the show you want.
Please pm me for making an arangement.

Watcher wrote:

glassy wrote:I stopped paying for this soft stuff a couple of years ago. Last nights show was a perfect example of why. Once again a newer model mostly nude all night gets ignored. If by ignoring models Eurotic rhinks it will encourage calls to see that model---then they should think again. It doesn't work. It only makes the models look for 'other' work.

Okay, so you're a non-paying viewer then ...

I see no justification for you final statements.
Obviously it does work, ETV only need enough income to keep the business viable and if this was not the case they'd do something about it.
The influx of new models demonstrates the business concept is a good one and there are plenty of forum members who express their desires for some models to find other work, so they're happy too.

I don't pay anymore. When I go to a shop I buy a product I collect it I go away a happy consumer.
I do not buy half the product only never to never collect it. Is a refund given if a wish is not fulfilled ?
I think not.

Joker1305 wrote:Wake up, if the job were that easy and privileged, why do most of the girls do that only for one or 2 years?

Because many of them finished their studies and started to do a real job? And because I think not many of them have dreamed about a job in the sex industry.

Except German watcher mother tongue, it's clear that ETV has a lot of audiences of countries where German language is not spoken.
For this reason English language must be spoken (as in this forum) in ETV (Know Hans English?)
Another matter is abt the messages that appear on ETV broadcast by Astra
ETV take care of censorship for the images of the models but not for the mssgs
(i.e. yesterday night appeared a mssg that search women for an xrate movies. mssg for erotic meeting, people that celebrates dimensions of.... et so on)
I agree that every mssg is money for ETV and censorship has no matter

Legxpert wrote:Yeah wow Scarlet worked 26 hours this week... what a slap to the face to people who work 40 or more hours per week.

I don't know what job you have, either it's really bad or you are just unable to estimate the strain of the job the girls do.
I'm sure 52h of my job as amechanical engineer are less exhausting than 26h of a motivated ETV model and probaly I'm even better paid ;)
And you have to consider the time for preparation and make up of the models

Legxpert wrote:And come on, there is no need to feel pity for her, over here strippers work way more than 26 hours per week.

26h on stage? I really doubt. And a stripper doesn't have a conversation with a caller in parallel.

Legxpert wrote:If she can't be on top of her game it's the wrong job for her and maybe she's better off selling burgers or washing dishes.

In this case there weren't many girls left at ETV.

Legxpert wrote:She has a privileged job and if she's not able to give 100% for 26 hours(!!!) I'm sorry she should rather apply to be a housecleaner or work at a assembly-line...

Wake up, if the job were that easy and privileged, why do most of the girls do that only for one or 2 years?

Regards
Joker

glassy wrote:I stopped paying for this soft stuff a couple of years ago. Last nights show was a perfect example of why. Once again a newer model mostly nude all night gets ignored. If by ignoring models Eurotic rhinks it will encourage calls to see that model---then they should think again. It doesn't work. It only makes the models look for 'other' work.

Okay, so you're a non-paying viewer then ...

I see no justification for you final statements.
Obviously it does work, ETV only need enough income to keep the business viable and if this was not the case they'd do something about it.
The influx of new models demonstrates the business concept is a good one and there are plenty of forum members who express their desires for some models to find other work, so they're happy too.

I stopped paying for this soft stuff a couple of years ago. Last nights show was a perfect example of why. Once again a newer model mostly nude all night gets ignored. If by ignoring models Eurotic rhinks it will encourage calls to see that model---then they should think again. It doesn't work. It only makes the models look for 'other' work.

uk334 wrote:Time for bed.
Congratulations ETV, once again you have shown your contempt for Gia and the paying viewer.
< snip >

Are any of the 'paying viewers' complaining?

uk334 wrote:Time for bed.
Congratulations ETV, once again you have shown your contempt for Gia and the paying viewer.
Every time Gia went to do something you cut to another model. And when the other model was by Gia, namely Kate you either zoomed Gia out or blocked her in view of the screen.
If I had of been Gia I would have walked of studio.

Absolutely disgusting that you have been paid monies for a service and again renegaded on your contract. The viewer quite clearly asked Gia to raise her skirt and yet again you cut away. Someone has a possible personal grudge against her to treat her this way and it does not belong in business.
No wonder you cannot to have another camera in the studio.

Simply one more Hanss Bulls**t-Show till now - as usual !

Time for bed.
Congratulations ETV, once again you have shown your contempt for Gia and the paying viewer.
Every time Gia went to do something you cut to another model. And when the other model was by Gia, namely Kate you either zoomed Gia out or blocked her in view of the screen.
If I had of been Gia I would have walked of studio.

Absolutely disgusting that you have been paid monies for a service and again renegaded on your contract. The viewer quite clearly asked Gia to raise her skirt and yet again you cut away. Someone has a possible personal grudge against her to treat her this way and it does not belong in business.
No wonder you cannot to have another camera in the studio.

Joker1305 wrote:...
But additionally they should give every model her 5 Minutes where only she (maybe in interaction with a second girl) is on the cam, with closeups, music according to the model's favor and some playing with the illumination (Scarlet's return scene IMHO was really brilliant).

I thought exactly the same! I only want to add that they should make this at least one time per hour. I'm sure this would be possible.

I really hate this kind of show - as I said some time before : what a waste of beautiful models - the sms box takes much too much space (could be moved to the very upper left of the screen) and 4 models don't have enough room to perform properly. Steadycam must not be bad as shown in the morning solo shows of 2007/2008 - but if one model covers the other like today it sucks. Let one of the girls do the camera work to show us the other 3 - zooming in and out can't be that difficult ... everything is better than this crap

zxcv wrote:I really want to understand what's the reasons beyond trapping the models in this very small area ...But if we assume that there are some economical reasons beyond providing the daytime shows sometimes in that way …with less lights , no mobile camera , etc ..

I suppose that it would not be too difficult …if they set a camera at the center of that small studio, shows more wider and overall angel which will give the models better chances to move freely all over the studio ...and will give the viewers a better chance to see their favorite models instead of watching them through that... very narrow hole .

Wide angle instead of switching from one to the other girl each 3 seconds, yes very appeciated.
But additionally they should give every model her 5 Minutes where only she (maybe in interaction with a second girl) is on the cam, with closeups, music according to the model's favor and some playing with the illumination (Scarlet's return scene IMHO was really brilliant).

Regards
Joker

I really want to understand what's the reasons beyond trapping the models in this very small area ...But if we assume that there are some economical reasons beyond providing the daytime shows sometimes in that way …with less lights , no mobile camera , etc ..

I suppose that it would not be too difficult …if they set a camera at the center of that small studio, shows more wider and overall angel which will give the models better chances to move freely all over the studio ...and will give the viewers a better chance to see their favorite models instead of watching them through that... very narrow hole .