Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
| Autor | Beiträge |
|---|---|
|
Post: #908 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 05.10.2017, 23:40 05.10.2017, 18:08 Re: Babestation - General Chat & DiscussionAniseedBalls wrote:I'm not a fan of Clare Richards, heaven forbid if I was a fan of any. But as I said earlier I do think Clare is quite babe-ish, in a would you like to fuck her sort of way. And believe me when I say I wouldn't touch some of the today models with the proverbial barge pole. But with Clare I would like to put my cock into her. Im sure none of them would touch you with the proverbial barge pole either, even the bland, ugly and old birds, I can't be fucking arsed to name 10 or more girls i would put above the plain faced and pasty Clare, but i would take most of the BS roster over her any fucking day and half of them are nothing special ether, I know there seems to be a little clique of posters on here but i can't agree with everything that is said, especially when a miserable moaner like you keeps slating all of the BS girls, then you give praise to the already overhyped Clare Richards and Danica 
|
|
|
|
|
|
AniseedBalls strikes again. What constitutes a babe? Clare certainly does.
I use the same rule of thumb as a Saturday night on the town. If I was lucky enough to see Clare out and about my internal Babe-o- Meter would register "Smash back doors in". The same would be for three or four others , although they are mainly Studio66 day babes. Except Hannah claydon or Charlie c who would probably register "Cum on face and tits". When it comes to "performance"? Who Cares? Scarlet whatever or Ella Jolie or any number of others could appear on the show with a dildo up their arse and apart from the vague curiosity that would follow I would swiftly change channel. If I was looking for "Girl next door " types I would look next door. My next door neighbour is better looking and more fuckable anyway. It doesn't matter if the girl is too glamourous or too good looking (if that's possible). Its a fantasy. No one reading this will ever be lucky enough to bang the arse off Anastasia Harris but its nice to think its possible. Shiny faced, big titted slappers are ten a penny in any town centre on a Friday night, as are pasty faced gingernuts. But I don't think they would constitute a "Babe" for the purpose of these shows. They shouldn't anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I always felt that Clare Richards is one of the ten most beautiful and nice models that I adore. Kind regards. Johnbirracchio |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not a fan of Clare Richards, heaven forbid if I was a fan of any. But as I said earlier I do think Clare is quite babe-ish, in a would you like to fuck her sort of way. And believe me when I say I wouldn't touch some of the today models with the proverbial barge pole. But with Clare I would like to put my cock into her.
It would be interesting to see who the ten models on Babestation that Luton would put ahead of, in his words "the much overrated Clare" would be...... |
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #904 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 05.10.2017, 03:38 05.10.2017, 03:21 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussioneddiemonsoon wrote:Lutonbloke it's funny you should mention ella i saw her this morning as i was awake even earlier than usual. Now i'm guessing it might not be that recent as i haven't seen her in maybe a couple of years (to be honest i thought she might still be in the same position as i last saw her) but when the fuck did she get the ridiculous tattoo on her chest? Blimey Eddie, how have you not managed to see Ella for 2 years she is on S66 nearly every fucking night, its like me saying i haven't seen the bloody twins and Lori Buckby for two years, its almost impossible to avoid them unless you don't watch the shows at all  Anniseed Balls, you may think Clare is a "babe" but i think she is ridiculously overrated, i'll admit she is probably the best of a bad bunch on S66, but if she was at BS i wouldn't put her in the top 10 list of girls and some of them are well past it |
|
|
|
|
|
Clare Richards, the only model on any night show that deserves to be called a babe......And how fucking ironic, she's the only girl to get a tattoo removed.
Just a little advice to all the stupid girls who think injecting a toxic substance under the skin is a thing that will make them beautiful, it doesn't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #902 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 04.10.2017, 20:15 04.10.2017, 20:13 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Lutonbloke it's funny you should mention ella i saw her this morning as i was awake even earlier than usual. Now i'm guessing it might not be that recent as i haven't seen her in maybe a couple of years (to be honest i thought she might still be in the same position as i last saw her) but when the fuck did she get the ridiculous tattoo on her chest?
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to be common practice, not just on Babestation, but on S66 also..... Now and again they seem to be a lot more daring in what they allow us to see. Take Alice for example on Babestation, for three or four appearances every now and again, She just loves to get that designer pussie on show, and the camera operator loves to show us. But after flashing the gash a few times its put back out of shot for a few weeks until the next purpose made sighting.
Same goes for S66 and the blonde bird Hannah. In some shows, her cunt almost devours her panties. And she loves having the producer on the edge of his moralistic seat. But the same as B/S he lets her get on with things. But only for so long then its back to Mary Whitehouse mode. It is obvious to me that these shows are the loss leaders to win back the ever decreasing fools and their money. |
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #900 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 05.10.2017, 00:42 04.10.2017, 18:11 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussiondogman wrote:eddiemonsoon wrote:really babestation should just apologise for everything (except the few months of bsx that actually were good before they realised they could just promise stronger shows but didn't actually have to deliver them).BSX the reason why this channel is now full of fuck ugly women,they slowly got rid of the star's and brought in,I'll say no more- Haha says the Ella Jolie fan, they don't come much duller and uglier than her, don't get me wrong i've seen some bad boob jobs on the shows, but in general natural girls are overrated, i don't get all the hype over this Scarlett Jones who is so pasty and bland, and then you have totally boring, egotistical, miserable and bland girls such as Stella Cox, Goldie Lox, Hannah Martin and Lilly Rose, the only one who i rate is Kandi Kay but she has long gone BS are now predominantly signing up girl next door types and girls covered in tatts, when they used to sign actual glamour models, each to their own and all that bullshit but the quality of girls coming through is just not the same as it used to be, some of my faves are past their prime now but at least they used to be stunners |
|
|
|
|
|
I found it funny how Sophie Hart mentioned that they had a technical issue that night, hence why the screens were black, and yet Preeti said "Sorry for earlier tonight, the producers kept us off screen for a while". Why not just say the same thing as the others regarding the technical failure?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AniseedBalls wrote:Do babestation ever apologise for, or explain why programmes, like on Monday night are not being transmitted? They have gone into hiding, they didn't offer any explanation on their twitter feed or over on sewage gutters either. Not quite as shy however when they are trying to plug their latest pictures or shitty Perv Cam offering, in saying that, BS can reliably rest easy knowing that a select number of fanboys are all too happy to post on the forums as to which model will be appearing alongside a picture which they also nabbed from their twitter page. Ouch..............better not upset the fanboys as some have been known to get very precious when someone else dares to steal their thunder. Ain't that right darren73 
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think i've worked out what happened on monday. They decided the curtain was too revealing, thought we could do the next show behind a wall. decided not to do things by half and introduced the ultimate "show in a black hole". Next week we're going back to year zero with "the show up their own arse" which is where they and their friends have been since 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
best-reporting wrote:AniseedBalls wrote:Do babestation ever apologise for, or explain why programmes, like on Monday night are not being transmitted? let's hope they're not waiting for any letters saying thank you for doing a good show. a poor little babestation producer all alone waiting for someone to pop something in his box. |
|
|
|
|
|
AniseedBalls wrote:Do babestation ever apologise for, or explain why programmes, like on Monday night are not being transmitted? No they wait for you to write a letter to say thankyou for not doing a show. |
|
|
|
|
|
really babestation should just apologise for everything (except the few months of bsx that actually were good before they realised they could just promise stronger shows but didn't actually have to deliver them).
|
|
|
