Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

If BS2 is anything to go by, I can only say it is curtains for Blandstation.
Sorry, must pull myself together

Who the heck at BS condones this frivolous nonsense.

Back to the games.

Goodnight all.

breaking news: tonights guest cameraman is stevie wonder

eddiemonsoon wrote:SB - just had a quick look over there, don't worry i wore all the correct protection gear, between them the top five posters have made a quarter of a million posts. That's one hell of a bowel problem.

Aye the main topic of discussion seems to be about the technical difficulties of last night, very little said whatsoever about the actual quality of babes or decline in the show as I like to call it.

On the plus side nice to see the usual members still plugging the shows and promoting the girls via pictures obtained from their twitter page

(They actually hand out awards over there for stalking)

Special night tonight. 4 women getting down and dirty at the same time on Babestation cams...

LOLOLOLOLOL

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

At least Tommie Jo is scheduled to be on the regular channels, so we might get 15 full minutes of good stuff from her.

mrmann wrote:Great start tonight, not. Nobody on screen

Proof that no one gets out of a black hole? Should we call stephen hawking?

SB - just had a quick look over there, don't worry i wore all the correct protection gear, between them the top five posters have made a quarter of a million posts. That's one hell of a bowel problem.

Well said, Scottishbloke I echo everything you say about this forum and the sewage works forum with their sycophants and arse lickers. Your points of views and synopses of the adult shows are always spot on. More power to you, mate

Gents I just wanted to say congratulations, this forum, the so called once quiet one which I was also once reliably informed was just a place for lazy members to simply log into to download videos is now a thing of the past. We are now officially the busiest when it comes to actual discussions on Babestation and co

Some very strong opinions are now being posted and although we may still have a few disagreements on here its certainly a lot more healthier than the UK forum which is just now one big fat smelly toilet full of fanboys discussing who has the best rack, schedule updates and ofcourse a helping hand from those members who continue to promote and plug by virtue of stalking the girls twitter pages ofcourse.

Keep it real and keep it here, we don't do fawning or arselicking. I will ofcourse address some of the points made later on after I have had my sleep as I have just got back from work after having worked my 5th night shift on the trot! (finally I have a few days off)

Great start tonight, not. Nobody on screen

morningstar wrote:Spot on Lutonbloke. The shows were better back then. That's why I rarely watch anymore

All of my favourites are no longer on the shows like Emma Spellar ,Kate Darcy, Sammie P and others including Evelyn who saves up her tit jiggling for the few who pay big bucks to see it on webcam.

Its very rare that I get stopped in my tracks by them nowadays unlike 5 or 6 years ago when we were truly spoilt for choice.

My views are a bit different to yours, you don't watch the shows because you don't find any of the current girls attractive, i don't watch that much partly because some of my faves have left and partly because the shows are so tame and predictable i get bored of watching my faves,

Now if say Dannii Harwood and Jenna Hoskins were to do a proper 2-4-1 in the shower then i would very much enjoy watching that, but that will never happen simply because of the strict rules. although Ofcom can't be blamed for everything when half of the time the producers are to blame and the girls are lazy and tame themselves

Another problem is the babeshows have been around for 10 years now so its inevitable the novelty has worn off

Spot on Lutonbloke. The shows were better back then. That's why I rarely watch anymore

All of my favourites are no longer on the shows like Emma Spellar ,Kate Darcy, Sammie P and others including Evelyn who saves up her tit jiggling for the few who pay big bucks to see it on webcam.

Its very rare that I get stopped in my tracks by them nowadays unlike 5 or 6 years ago when we were truly spoilt for choice.

It's nice to see that the gorgeous sexy Olivia has taken her stockings off for once when going nude. I do wish she would take them off more often as she has the most sexy legs and feet. I don't know why she doesn't take them off more often. If she did she would please her fans more who prefer her with no stockings on and also please her fans who like her with stockings on; the best of both worlds, so to speak.

morningstar wrote:Ill put my hands up Lutonbloke. Of course performance matters, but only in the context of the fact that the person performing is actually a "Babe" in what seems to be a wide ranging umbrella term nowadays.

You are also correct in the fact that some of the most popular, as you put it, are the laziest and most gormless looking bints. They are probably popular because they are good looking and have universal appeal. Whereas overly tattooed birds, fat birds, old birds and plain ugly fuckers have a narrow window to work in so they have to put on a show to drum up support.

All I'm saying really is if you dress a pig in stockings and suspenders its still a pig in stocking and suspenders.

By the way, you seem to be a member of the clique here as much as anybody.

Believe me im not a member of the clique, i can't stand that miserable bastard Anniseed balls he is like the complete opposite to that Rammyrascal, but i do tend to get on well with the others on here, i haven't always agreed with you and AB but i kept quiet

We can debate about what girls are the best looking till the cows come home but its a pointless debate because its a case of each to their own, but if people are gonna keep slating my faves on BS then i'll happily trash the girls they like

What isn't subjective is the shows are far tamer and too over censored compared to 5-6 years ago, infact even just 2-3 years ago they were a lot raunchier than they are now with the odd good 2-4-1 taking place

Personally i find a few of the babestation girls attractive such as Ashley, Dannii, Nicole, Olivia and Tommie Jo, although i would like to see a few of my faves come back to the shows to give a bit more variety but that probably won't happen

Ill put my hands up Lutonbloke. Of course performance matters, but only in the context of the fact that the person performing is actually a "Babe" in what seems to be a wide ranging umbrella term nowadays.

You are also correct in the fact that some of the most popular, as you put it, are the laziest and most gormless looking bints. They are probably popular because they are good looking and have universal appeal. Whereas overly tattooed birds, fat birds, old birds and plain ugly fuckers have a narrow window to work in so they have to put on a show to drum up support.

All I'm saying really is if you dress a pig in stockings and suspenders its still a pig in stocking and suspenders.

By the way, you seem to be a member of the clique here as much as anybody.

That Scarlett Jones thinks a lot of herself doesn't she, i see she posts on the other forum and in one of her posts she said she deserves more screen time as her shows are as good as anyone else's, no they are fucking not, plus she thanks all the posts from people who slag off her colleges for having fake tits, that isn't very professional form her is it

Clearly she is only posting on that forum to promote herself, but once she has made more money and got a big enough fanbase she will soon fuck off and start ripping people off like the majority of the others do, then she can afford a holiday to get some sun on her pasty skin

morningstar wrote:AniseedBalls strikes again. What constitutes a babe? Clare certainly does.

I use the same rule of thumb as a Saturday night on the town. If I was lucky enough to see Clare out and about my internal Babe-o- Meter would register "Smash back doors in".

The same would be for three or four others , although they are mainly Studio66 day babes. Except Hannah claydon or Charlie c who would probably register "Cum on face and tits".

When it comes to "performance"? Who Cares?

Scarlet whatever or Ella Jolie or any number of others could appear on the show with a dildo up their arse and apart from the vague curiosity that would follow I would swiftly change channel.

If I was looking for "Girl next door " types I would look next door. My next door neighbour is better looking and more fuckable anyway.

It doesn't matter if the girl is too glamourous or too good looking (if that's possible). Its a fantasy. No one reading this will ever be lucky enough to bang the arse off Anastasia Harris but its nice to think its possible. Shiny faced, big titted slappers are ten a penny in any town centre on a Friday night, as are pasty faced gingernuts. But I don't think they would constitute a "Babe" for the purpose of these shows. They shouldn't anyway.

Of course performance matters, i don't care how good someone looks i still want to see a good show and not see her lay around doing fuck all with a bored gormless look on her face,

But it comes as no surprise that the most popular girls tend to be the laziest fuckers and i don't find most of them attractive anyway, there are way too many easily pleased people out there, a few of my faves are the lesser names who put more of a shift in, another problem is a lot of the old school generation of viewers/callers and babeshow girls have fucked off which is partly why the channels these days are so boring and predictable