The good old days - A nostalgia thread

Yes, yes..the girls next door a fantastic career

Last night I spoke with Isabella in Livejasmin chat. I asked if she was going back to ETV. She told me that she is happy in LJ and she had to work there for a year, but she was not captive there, so she could leave whenever she wanted. she told me in ETV paid more but they had many rules and did not allow the girls do what they wanted. only allow the web shows that they do more things. then she gave me a private lesboshow, but I do not know how to capture the video.
Sorry for my english.

delena wrote:

outside wrote:Not surprised, if she has to act as a camgirl at ETVShow, better to do on her own.
Anyway the profile looks of her friend, she is just her partner.

Her nickname is SuperSexy21XXX and also does show herself without her partner.

would be nice 'cause her partner looks like she needs a lot of sleep. ;)

PS: first request (for free of course ) is a request for a foot show.

outside wrote:Not surprised, if she has to act as a camgirl at ETVShow, better to do on her own.
Anyway the profile looks of her friend, she is just her partner.

Her nickname is SuperSexy21XXX and also does show herself without her partner.

Not surprised, if she has to act as a camgirl at ETVShow, better to do on her own.
Anyway the profile looks of her friend, she is just her partner.

shagshaggy wrote:SexyCrazyCats2 one of models very like her!

Hi. This is my first post.

One of the models is Isabella, The back tatoo is the same.

[hidden link - please register]

She does a lesbian show with another girl. Would be interesting to upload some video.

c'est une video trés hot de karry et de mashiara : P
[hidden link - please register]

Where is Michelle?
And have information for that beautiful girl? (Last name, age, country vs)
Thanks.
[hidden image - please register]

opaotto wrote:

Slowfox wrote:I figure that leads any previous discussion about respect towards and protection of the models ad absurdum.

Nobody has to protect her and nobody protected her: @02:05:12 her face was clearly recognizable.

Sorry i cant understand this discussion.Has Alicia been forced to do a full stripi?The answer is no!!!She took the risk to get recognised by the camera.So its whose fault?Etv or Alicia(Maybe both)So we shouldnt talk about protection of girls.About respect let me think.Alicia is old enough to know whether she feels comfortable to be naked or not.Besides she made a very interesting exclusive few weeks ago.Of course there is a difference between getting fully naked or nearly topless but anyway the willing was there.Pst you re taking this stuff a way too seriously.

opaotto wrote:

Slowfox wrote:I figure that leads any previous discussion about respect towards and protection of the models ad absurdum.

Nobody has to protect her and nobody protected her: @02:05:12 her face was clearly recognizable.

With this detailed confirmation, you made it even more absurd.

But the baby has now been spilled with the bath anyway.

Slowfox wrote:I figure that leads any previous discussion about respect towards and protection of the models ad absurdum.

Nobody has to protect her and nobody protected her: @02:05:12 her face was clearly recognizable.

I figure that leads any previous discussion about respect towards and protection of the models ad absurdum.

logic wrote:

yusef89 wrote:

outside wrote:This appeared on their site (I think news section, details of premium show):
Today in the show for a little while one more model will be a guest. We will not announce the name of the fifth lady, by her request.

whats the problem to reveal the name of the girl?In my opinion its a little bit childish how do u react.He hasnt revealed nothing personal.Besides she isnt a girl on the street who was catched by the cam.She works in an erotic channel and it was her decision to get naked.Sorry but i cant understand your problem.
And if the video will be released there will be guys who will pay this video to know what she did exactly.I dont see any problem

As you can read, ETV announced, that she don't want to get published her name! If we respect that, I would call it gentle and not childish!

Of course you can say now, that's the usual game ETV is playing with us..........like with other newbies..........maybe, maybe not. But for me it doesn't matter........I saw this hot performance, I recognized her.....and I was (of course) very surprised! And for sure I wasn't the only one. So why is it so difficult to express this here in the forum and to respect the wish of the model.

Maybe its not so "gentle" to reveal the girls name but i find it even worse from Etv because the guys who havent seen her show because it was unexpected.Of course the guys who took the risk and payed for the show want to have an advantage towards those who didnt see that but for others its kind of punishment(i dont know when exactly they announced that maybe in the day of the show).In addition i feel that the show besides that surprise has not been that good because otherwise the talking would be most of the show not about the announcment of the girls name

yusef89 wrote:

outside wrote:This appeared on their site (I think news section, details of premium show):
Today in the show for a little while one more model will be a guest. We will not announce the name of the fifth lady, by her request.

whats the problem to reveal the name of the girl?In my opinion its a little bit childish how do u react.He hasnt revealed nothing personal.Besides she isnt a girl on the street who was catched by the cam.She works in an erotic channel and it was her decision to get naked.Sorry but i cant understand your problem.
And if the video will be released there will be guys who will pay this video to know what she did exactly.I dont see any problem

As you can read, ETV announced, that she don't want to get published her name! If we respect that, I would call it gentle and not childish!

Of course you can say now, that's the usual game ETV is playing with us..........like with other newbies..........maybe, maybe not. But for me it doesn't matter........I saw this hot performance, I recognized her.....and I was (of course) very surprised! And for sure I wasn't the only one. So why is it so difficult to express this here in the forum and to respect the wish of the model.

bellerophon wrote:

outside wrote:Just to report what happened yesterday.
This appeared on their site (I think news section, details of premium show):
Today in the show for a little while one more model will be a guest. We will not announce the name of the fifth lady, by her request. She will make two viewers wishes: full striptease behind white curtain and smoke dance (you will see only her silhouette). The model has never before participated in a Premium show, also has never taken off her clothes, so she wants to remain anonymous. Important: We will not show the model in any other way except as a silhouette!

Not so easy to spot the "shy" model, firstofall because there were just 3 who have never undressed (of course Brona, Evah and Joanna were out of contest): Alicia, Ariel and Lorena.

The "silhouette" was unmistakable.
It was Alicia and she was fully naked.

I'm sorry to appear as the voice of conscience here, but if the girl specifically requested that her name NOT be revealed, and it was an encrypted show not in the public domain, why is it OK to allow her name to be disclosed in this public forum? It's not a very nice or chivalrous gesture towards the poor girl and will probably put her off ever appearing again, if that's you want to achieve, which I'm sure it is. If a screen cap were published it would soon be removed. What's the difference?

And why publish it anyway? All those who paid to watch would know who it was. Isn't it a bit ironic that those who refuse on principle to pay to watch (but watch anyway) should spill the beans?

You know my thoughts, so you could avoid this post. And I won't answer, because I won't argue. And if we will discuss, I could be not so kind.
But let me say just this: your conscience was silent about Rose and her macro show in balaclava. No chivalry for her?