| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
bellerophon wrote:It's official. According to the girls page Amanda is 6 times less popular than Amy There are lies, damned lies and statistics ..... .... all we really know is that Amy has (approximately) 6 times the number of votes that Amanda has |
|
|
|
|
|
piggy wrote:With all the respect for GIA but her position makes me really nervous !She is very popular |
|
|
|
|
I would leave it the way it is, because with a 30 day moving average you get also some steadyness in a models ranking and not some stock-like moves on just one hot show or one bad one.
Also I wonder is it really that important? It's only a statistic that says something about a models popularity. Does it mather if a models gets naked or not to be hot or not? NOt in my opinion, not always anyway. Some models could never be hot and in fact they get less hot when they get more naked. I think it's all good the way it is.  (even though it doesn't reflect my personal "ranking") |
|
|
|
|
|
|
With all the respect for GIA but her position makes me really nervous !
what she did to deserve that rank position ? and WHO votes her so much ? there is something wierd in this vote points method. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
For me, the problem is to see Lia staying in rank 17 after her last nightshow !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi again,
it was only a idea of me with splitting the votes. But why ETV never gives a comment when a model leave? First they celebrate that Raya is a new model and Nikita said she is glad that she see some new models blah blah. But after some minutes the new model was gone and nobody says a word. Why can´t the mod say that model ABC only tried to be here and felt unhappy and left. Is it so hard? And fman1: I would put Gia into to the softmodels but i think there would be the opinions different. But for me she is soft because she only did one "hot" show and that is for me not enough to be hot. But it is only my opinion. Regards |
|
|
|
|
I think that good idea would be a to differentiate the vote by beauty of voting by show. Brona does not teaches nothing but is a very beautiful woman. Lilian or Lace teach much but are women who do not have any appeal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markus76 wrote:You took the words right out of my mouth.Gia in the hot or the soft page ? |
|
|
|
|
|
You took the words right out of my mouth.
Why is Raya in the Girlspage? She only appeared ten minutes and would never be seen. She isn´t in the schedule and why is she still there? I have no words..... And in my opinion you should have two voting pages because this is the only channel with soft and hot models. So, why don´t split the soft and hot model? It is only a idea but with this change Gia would never be No. 3. Regards, Markus |
|
|
|
|
|
bellerophon wrote:Can somebody please explain on what criteria Raya is no. 36 with 1.67% of the total vote when she only appeared once for a total of ten minutes? It makes her more than twice as popular as Amanda.10 minutes are not enough to hate her ! 
|
|
|
|
|
That a model raises up or fall down in the ranking of the model`s page can has two reasons:
1) The model has got a lot of points (then raising up!) or only less points (then falling down!) in the last days 2) The model lost only less points (then raising up!) or a lot of points (then falling down!) from voting 30 days ago 1) is obvious for everyone, 2) not! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two other ideas:
1) Two categories for all girls A-Beauty B-Performence 2) 0-10 points for a better differentiation It's only a idea |
|
|
|
|
|
HvB wrote:Only the votes of the last 30 days are used to calculate the scores. From what I understood fman and pepers (iirc) ask for a use of the last 14 days instead of 30 days. |
|
|
|
|
|
Only the votes of the last 30 days are used to calculate the scores.
This has been explained multiple times. Somewhere is also an epic and in deepth explanation with examples and real tables from that time to show how it works. Please use the search function. ty. |
|
|
|
|
|
The models rating is used by a lot of members, so most of the models have a lot of points. When a model become hotter (better), she has to wait several weeks/months to rise in rank. A suggestion has already been written in the forum to take account of the votes only during two weeks (and not 4 like currently) to obtain more reactivity.
Of course, I am agree with this idea ! What is your opinion ? |
|
|
