Author | Posts |
---|---|
So, she passed the test and today she has her first shift as a model
In her try out she looked pretty comfortable and not shy Wish her to have fun and enjoy her time in the studio Time will tell how far can she go |
|
|
|
she is ok as a model
|
|
|
|
Prompt please: Fox Premium Show was naked?
|
|
|
|
hopefully next time we can see you again in frost night shows
|
|
|
|
foxy you are a hot model not soft model, you are an eurotic girl ( night show full naked )
|
|
|
|
In my opinon she is misplaced in the nightshow if she don't change her behaviour.
Funny suggestion they can't do hot shows on TV in the daytime so they do it in the web In the nighttime they can do hot shows in TV so they can put the soft shows in the web. It wouldn't happen but it would be interesting. ETV always tries to soften the nightshow or try to make money with unfulfilled SMS or complaints on SMS. So I give up complaining in the shows it's useless and just brings the opposite. |
|
|
|
Well if nothing else Foxy has given us plenty to discuss over the last few days,I'll throw my peneth worth in a bit late but just got in from work I wrote earlier that we needed to give her a bit more time and I really expected her to step up a gear but sadly this hasn't happened but I'll still quite happily watch her and I still think she's a welcome addition to any NS I'd still rather see her in lingerie than some others naked
|
|
|
|
Well nothing against Selena. For me Foxy is more erotic (when she is not doing anything special really) then at least a dozen models who do get naked and Veronica is developping into a really great addition in any nightshow line up. but as models are not all alike neither are the viewers I guess
|
|
|
|
I often wondering how stupid you must be actually located on ETV in the night show the idiots to make.
Foxy is so a copy. If you do with in such a show, you know but what want most of one. Namely that one nude is.. She's not shy in my eyes, she just don't know what you want. |
|
|
|
Watcher wrote:vappiano68 wrote:Watcher wrote:Below we see the perfect example of the contrast between one who participates in the show and one who does not. Jonas is a good example. |
|
|
|
vappiano68 wrote:Watcher wrote:Below we see the perfect example of the contrast between one who participates in the show and one who does not. ??? |
|
|
|
FredvomJupiter wrote:It is a proven fact: If new models dont show their goodies in the first 3-4 weeks, they will never do it. Patience is obsolete at ETV. what a proven bullshit. a proven fact would be that a forum member who caused trouble with his first account will get problems with all other accounts, too. especially if he proves that he had absolutely no respect, has no and will never develope any respect for the models and other forum members. your zero developement is more sad than any developement at etv, MorkvomOrk or what ever will your next nickname be. |
|
|
|
Watcher wrote:Below we see the perfect example of the contrast between one who participates in the show and one who does not. And the 3rd cathegory? |
|
|
|
Below we see the perfect example of the contrast between one who participates in the show and one who does not.
'Dreamlander' is happy to participate and enjoys what he gets in return for his money. 'FredvomJupiter' refuses to participate and so deserves all he gets for his money ... |
|
|
|
I'm not a fan of multi-quoting so will just write a reply. You say you will 'never ever call the girls'. How do you contribute to their earnings then? If you have never had a request turned down by Foxy, what is there to complain about? What has she cost you?
The whole ideal of ETV is selling a fantasy. They make the vast majority of their money from callers. it's a business but it can be fun for both parties unlike many transactions these days. So, you won't speak to them but want to be entertained for free? Off the back of some other guy's paid for wishes? It's fortunate you can 'complain' here because ETV, rightly, would not be interested in a non-customer. She is also not the first, and won't be the last to change their performance depending on the platform. The relative anonymity of the encrypted WebShows is always preferable to the free-to-air satellite channel broadcast to millions for a lot of the girls at ETV now. I will never understand why people don't get that. It was never an option before, which explains why the Night show cast is predominantly the pre-webshow long serving girls. Again, you site the 'lack of respect' to other girls? Her 'arrogant attitude'? What makes you come to that conclusion? Just watching and waiting, I'm guessing. Do you have any idea how the girls get paid for a Night Show? What the pay structure is? I do. They are not really bothered what another girl does or doesn't show, as long as she is making money as it benefits them all. That's why supposedly 'soft' models are put in Night Shows and always have been. For variety, the promise (fulfilled or not) of something different for once. Unfortunately for the girl involved, there's usually a lot of negativity here about them. Fortunately, most of them have never heard of this place, or can't access it and it's influence is minimal, as callers and texters and WebShow Premium viewers are the only concern. Venting is probably beneficial only to the poster himself. Finally, as I mentioned. The girls often have other jobs too which is why there is a pattern to their appearances. If you were Foxy and were offered a Night Show because that's when you were free, even though you did not want to be 'hot' but needed the money, would you take the shift? ETV's bosses are happy with any girl making them money, no matter what she does or doesn't do. There are many Daytime 'Statues' who have been there for years, pretty much doing nothing...but they make money. They are protected by the watershed, girls like Foxy and the many 'soft' girls who have done Night Shows in the past are not. It only seems to matter to a few members here though, fortunately. Dreamlander-feel free to use my pseudonym as a putdown again, it's not been done much before. |
|
|