Author | Posts |
---|---|
dazaman wrote:At the moment its saying "Temporary Fault....We'll be right back..." I see its back to saying this |
|
|
|
Watcher wrote:uk334 wrote:Well I watched Sky's babstation channels last night, because I do not watch etv crap anymore and I have to say.... Don't think so, lots of threads here regarding etv now on Sky tv and what the qualty of thier shows are likely to be. I am sure it will replaced if that is the case |
|
|
|
uk334 wrote:Well I watched Sky's babstation channels last night, because I do not watch etv crap anymore and I have to say.... Haven't you posted this in the wrong place then? |
|
|
|
Well I watched Sky's babstation channels last night, because I do not watch etv crap anymore and I have to say....
There were very good camera angles, panty and boob close ups, open legs and naked models, not showing it all but as close as etv if not closer. Models perhaps not as natural and shall I say nice as thats a matter of taste. 100% better than etv offers, so I think they had better step up their game one way or another, even aft shows have more eurotic in them than etv. |
|
|
|
Instead if ETV comes to Greece, they may be present naked bodies all day!!!!!
|
|
|
|
vappiano68 wrote:Jonas, this is what you see watching ETV, but I can't find any written rule about this for Austria, Germany and Italy. Not only see, but sometimes hear. You are partly right: No viewer has ever seen written rules. And there are also different rules, dependent of the directors! |
|
|
|
Tarl_Cabot wrote:opaotto wrote:And you think Dreamlander would have expressed his opinion in a direct email to ETV in this style ? Don't underestimate my imagination. I even can imagine someone forwarding posts to ETV. (That's my last statement about this topic.) |
|
|
|
jonas wrote:The problem is that in different countries exist different rules. Jonas, this is what you see watching ETV, but I can't find any written rule about this for Austria, Germany and Italy. |
|
|
|
Tarl_Cabot wrote:opaotto wrote:And you think Dreamlander would have expressed his opinion in a direct email to ETV in this style ? Thanks guys for the heads up! I've never been to that section of the Member's site before and there it is,my post,almost,in it's entirety.The far-reaching influence of this forum! When it suits! I have no real issue with it,I wrote what I thought to be true and it can only be read by those that have already joined,so I don't really see who it is helping.It was just a defence,if it were needed,of a channel who do things differently.Not always to everyone's taste,that's impossible,but different in a way I like. Dreamlander-Dealing with the 'fame' Some complimentary credits would have been nice! |
|
|
|
opaotto wrote:And you think Dreamlander would have expressed his opinion in a direct email to ETV in this style ? you as an ETV Gold member should remember several posts which were made in this forum and in the ETV Gold forum, too. and you still not imagine all possibilities or explanations for Dreamlanders post also in the ETV News site. |
|
|
|
Tarl_Cabot wrote:opaotto wrote:Dreamlander wrote:... And you think Dreamlander would have expressed his opinion in a direct email to ETV in this style ? (... shows,they have now,and before..., ... ETV have been doing what... ) |
|
|
|
opaotto wrote:Dreamlander wrote:... and it's so difficult to imagine other ways to get an opinion of a paying customer than this forum???? |
|
|
|
Dreamlander wrote:Whatever is or isn't going on onscreen in comparison to the UK shows,they have now,and before being on the Sky platform,got 4 girls almost always on the phones with regular SMS's coming in.That's efficient and profitable,as opposed to one girl,one channel on the UK stations getting cramp in their arms through so much 'phone wiggling' trying to attract callers.This is just a generalisation of course to try to prove a point but this is acceptable on forums! The proof ETV isn't reading here: Though being quoted on their website no hitting of the 'Thank You Button'. What may be the reason to omit your last sentence? |
|
|
|
jonas wrote:The problem is that in different countries exist different rules. Well I'm sorry if this sounds harsh, jonas, but I really don't care what messages appear on screen or what the girls are/are not allowed to say. I'm only concerned with what I SEE, and compared to the UK-based channels ETV falls very VERY short of the mark. |
|
|
|
Whatever is or isn't going on onscreen in comparison to the UK shows,they have now,and before being on the Sky platform,got 4 girls almost always on the phones with regular SMS's coming in.That's efficient and profitable,as opposed to one girl,one channel on the UK stations getting cramp in their arms through so much 'phone wiggling' trying to attract callers.This is just a generalisation of course to try to prove a point but this is acceptable on forums!
ETV have been doing what they do,quite successfully it seems,unchallenged in Europe for a long time now.The shows have altered to accommodate various censorship enforcements but still they remain,with what is a unique product with,as far as I can tell,a fan and customer base that doesn't seem to be shrinking all that much. It may look tame,odd etc. in comparison to the UK shows but there must be a market out there for guys who want to speak to a pretty girl who isn't a career glamour model but just the kind of girl you would hope to meet in your normal walk of life.Don't forget,none of these girls are glamour models and most have second jobs or are students as well.That kind of unique scenario certainly fills a gap in the UK market at the moment and has,as the standard,filled a gap in the Euro Zone for some years now.I would have been more concerned if they had tried to produce shows identical to the UK output,which we all know has been shrinking in number of channels and girls due in no small part to the strangling powers of OfCom in latter years. Now,if you'll excuse me,I have an appointment with Hannah Mac's awesome ass! For me,she is the saviour of daytime babeshows in UK. Dreamlander |
|
|