What if ?

This post was written after too many fruit sundaes, the occasional knickerbocker glory and certainly no banana splits.

I've watched, no, make that suffered, the assorted pudding that is currently on the ETV menu. For the last two nights (Sunday & Monday) we even got a commercial for the main course to arrive at the table at 23:00 which is promised to be hot. But with Hans being your server (ie mod) for the first night you just knew that he would probably trip up before the dish got to the table.

And when the dish was served, in the best traditions of the tv, they over-did the lights and you just could not see what they were trying to do.

But on Monday they even bettered that. My head has just cleared from the migrane of trying to tell who was placed behind that red curtain with bright lights that pulsed through my screen. The only real consolation was that the experience was quite short.

I know I watch too much and I do write too much. And in these writings I have at times questioned the honesty and sincerity of the whole thing. Sometimes conspiracy theories go in my head which I feel I must share with you. So allow me to point out some similarities from the last time mostly cold food was served on the plate.

1. There was a sudden influx of new models. We hoped to see them in nightshows just to see if they had Talent and Ability.

2. Whereas that time of day when you get the cherries served on top of the icecream scoops is suspposed to start at 23:00, can someone please explain to me why, for the last two mondays, there has quite deliberately been no exposure before 23:45. In fact almost on the stroke of 23:45 my suspicious mind tells me that some specific instruction took place - if you have a recording do take a look.If you do not then I will fill you in later.

So while there may indeed be some legal framework controlling this, that may not tell the whole picture. What if these models were indeed brought in for a specific market ? And what if that market has different time-frames for different days ?

Look in for ferther, or should that read further, developments.

As previously said, I do not have to explain why I think a topic has gone 'off'.

This discussion is now ended. Continue it elsewhere and you will have to watch yer ass.

@ OldGrizzly:

< I know I watch too much and I do write too much. And in these writings I have at times questioned
the honesty and sincerity of the whole thing. Sometimes conspiracy theories go in my head which
I feel I must share with you. So allow me to point out some similarities from the last time mostly
cold food was served on the plate.>

< What if these models were indeed brought in for a specific market ? >

These are 2 phrases of the initial post of DB.
Moreover yesterday, at 17:38 , Midnight posted a doc in which we can read about
ETV expanding in US market.

So we can understand that the topic deals with:

1)Theories explaining the actual pitiful shows broadcasted by ETV.
2)ETV expanding in new markets.

Now you can tell me everything but I really don't understand how can you
adfirm my post of 11:18 is off-topic.
It's only a possible explanation of the points 1) and 2).

< It certainly did not seem to add anything to the topic - just more wild theories.
And then you wonder why people respond like they do.

Where is the off-topic ???
My post is 100 % about the topic !!! Can you say the same thing for other comments ?

-----------------------------------------------------
< I will allow you the right of reply so that you do not foul any other topics after which this one will, unfortunately, be closed. >

What do you exect I can reply to you ?
Nothing, because you will never say to be wrong !
I have no words, because the words I have in my mind could give you
the possibility of kicking my a*s out of the forum.
And I will not give you this possibility.

Oh my. Here we go again. Someone posts a comment and the percieved victim starts bleating like a wounded lamb.

Actually Vappiano I do not owe you an explanation. If I feel a topic has gone 'off' then I will close it. Unfortunately for this one which could have been a good topic it has gone 'oiff' and looking with a fresh mind at today's twitterings the post of 11:18 certainly kicked it all of. And I wonder just who was responsible for that. It certainly did not seem to add anything to the topic - just more wild theories. And then you wonder why people respond like they do.

I will allow you the right of reply so that you do not foul any other topics after which this one will, unfortunately, be closed.

@ ghostwriter2008

Ok.Thanks

@ ghostwriter2008:

< so you say somebody who just calls the girls to talk or at least doesn't want
to see them naked is an idiot? >

This could be the only rhetorical question and, in fact, I answered explaining my thought.
I referred to the other phrase.
I meant only that in this way every topic degenerates in an off-topic discussion.
Maybe someone is interested in doing this .....
However for me it's a closed case.

Btw : < looks like it starts with the leaving of the models, if sabrina demands "jonas" to call there can be
not much other possibilities... >

when did you hear this ? Today ?

@ OldGrizzly :

I think you own me at least an explanation.
I read the rules and I find:

What's allowed:
- fair criticism of models
- criticism of directors and moderators
- creative suggestions how to improve shows

(that is what I do in this forum)

What's not allowed:
- .....
- .....
- abuse to fellow members

( that is the only aim of Rockabye, with the result of
stupid off-topic ping-pongs )

Now can you tell me:
according to you it's worst to say a "certain word" referred to nobody
or to tell a forum member:

"< in the real-world you have to pay too until a beautiful girl takes you to the promised land >

This is not a matter of "sense of humor".
This is a matter or " respect of the rules ".
If you don't stop this behaviour every topic will be ruined.

I wait for your answer
( and not answers from Rockabye)

<<< Do you think this phrase of Rockabye respects the rules of the forum ?
I don't understand the reason this member continue his free attacks to me.
What does he want from me ?

Can you take some measure ?
I'm tired to see this member making only free attacks without being punished !
What is he offering to the forum but free attacks to me and other members ? >>>
 

where did I attack you???

with "you" I've meant you, me and anybody else.

you have paranoia and I've never seen a person with such a low sense of humour...

... but you wanna go this way, a few posts ago you've called me an idiot ;-)

@ OldGrizzly :

< in the real-world you have to pay too until a beautiful girl takes you to the promised land >

Do you think this phrase of Rockabye respects the rules of the forum ?
I don't understand the reason this member continue his free attacks to me.
What does he want from me ?

Can you take some measure ?
I'm tired to see this member making only free attacks without being punished !
What is he offering to the forum but free attacks to me and other members ?

<<< I simply think the world is full of beautiful girls with whom you can speak
without spending money. >>>

in the real-world you have to pay too until a beautiful girl takes you to the promised land.

<<< If you want to talk or you don't want to see something exciting from a girl,
there is no reason you spend money to call " The kings of soft" ! >>>

not only boobs and pussies can be exciting.

@ Rockabye:

< so you say somebody who just calls the girls to talk or at least doesn't want
to see them naked is an idiot? >

I simply think the world is full of beautiful girls with whom you can speak
without spending money.
If you want to talk or you don't want to see something exciting from a girl,
there is no reason you spend money to call " The kings of soft" !

Is my explanation sufficient ?

--------------------
@ elmo :

< you are wasting valuable cells in even attempting to think like them >

< they fake it - the whole thing is a scam >

I totally agree !
Bye

@ vappiano68

you are wasting valuable cells in even attempting to think like them.

Logical thought - no way

Lateral thought - no way

it is diagonal or circular or triangular or even spherical, if anything at all

they seem to have many good irrational ideas that just don't work, or don't work for long. So they change something, anything. Austro - Molvanian thought patterns are more likely to be connected with the weather

it happens - accept it,

...... buy an umbrella, buy some skis, buy some sun glasses. whatever you do it will always be the wrong choice

it doesn't make any difference if you call the girls or not,

they fake it - the whole thing is a scam

good wholesome family entertainment that has been going for years, without actually doing anything. Models come, models go, some return, some don't

it is the ultimate soap.

@ vappiano

<<< The problem is that I can't understand how many people can really call the girls to
see these " nothing show " !

As I said before, maybe they think that new markets can provide a sufficient number of idiots ! >>>

so you say somebody who just calls the girls to talk or at least doesn't want to see them naked is an idiot?

Just a quick thought .

Maybe ETV could think so:
------------------------------------------------------------
1) During ETV Golden Age : ( following numbers are only an example ):

a) We had 1000 viewers
b) we had 20 callers ( 1:50 ratio )
c) we spent 100 ( to broadcast something good )

resulting earnings : 100

2) Now We expand selling these pitiful shows :

a) we have 10000 viewers
b) this number of viewers can provide the same number (20) of "ingenuous" callers (1:500 ratio this time)
c) we spent 33
(broadcasting actual shows we spare money in studio, models, camera works and
in the future, sat licenses)

resulting earnings : 300 ( 3 times the past earnings ).
------------------------------------------------------------
At this point they could broadcast their pitiful shows
everyday,24 a day,without having censorship problems .

The problem is that I can't understand how many people can really call the girls to
see these " nothing show " !
As I said before, maybe they think that new markets can provide a sufficient number of idiots !

@ ghostwriter i shouldn't worry too much about this.

from past experience you should know that the Austro-Molvanian way of thinking is very different to any other culture on this planet.