| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
to make a perfect static camera show the cam must be lower and a little far ( same way as you see a show on theatre).. this way you'll see full bodies starting from feet and perspective will help to seem all more fascinating..
and girls must be on 3 lines from lower to upper, as on a stairs (or a pyramid)... ETV must learn it studying the reinassence italian art of XV century. |
|
|
|
|
After watching a recording of the show today I noticed they had a quick break to another camera and when they returned to the original static cam it had been re- positioned and the lights were not so intrusive. Well done Eurotic but it should have been noticed earlier. I still like this format now and again if it's done right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and this is a very quick analysis why i think the show is absolutely ruined:
[hidden link - please register] |
|
|
|
|
|
you are absolutely right: there are 2 strong points of light above, making 2 vertical "lines" of light crossingthe screen al the time:
[hidden link - please register] and again the cam placed strategically in the censoring purpose: [hidden link - please register][hidden link - please register]  
|
|
|
|
|
Its not going as well as the first show of this type. The camera is set too low and there is no chair or sofa in front of the camera left or right for the models to sit on. Only Eurotic can take a good idea and ruin it second time around--goodnight all
|
|
|
|
|
|
Things would improve if they switched off the blue light in the top right hand area of the studio. It's casting a 'fog' over the transmission !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
The models have to be like herring in a jar, not that kind of system work, does not in any way, you see that the models ilmeistä.No Eurotica TV doing what he wants, without thinking about the customers, as before.
|
|
|
|
|
malmaisons wrote:I just noticed that Cassie did the 'after hour' before her morning show - is there somebody around who watched or recorded it? Cassie didnt appear in the afterhour, she only made the regular morning shift from 07.00-12.00 CET the schedule at etvshow.com is not accurate (once again) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
pepe84 wrote:I just noticed that Cassie did the 'after hour' before her morning show - is there somebody around who watched or recorded it? Maybe she is more willing to show skin when (nearly) everybody is sleepingmilena1983 wrote:No Cassie this afternoon???Cassie was there in the morning, she changed her shift with Kat  In general I hate girls swapping shifts last-minute - if I knew before I would have recorded it 
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you pepe
|
|
|
|
|
milena1983 wrote:No Cassie this afternoon??? Cassie was there in the morning, she changed her shift with Kat |
|
|
|
|
|
No Cassie this afternoon???
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pepe84 wrote:moving cam or static cam . . . they always find a way to fuck it upThe last shows I saw were not that bad. The advantage for me is, the girls can better control if they are in the picture and what is shown, and no video mixer can destroy it. The only fuzzy factor is the zoom and the direction of the camera, but not that hectic switching forth and back between the girls anymore. OK, on the weekend it tends to be a bit crowded, but in general it forces the girls to share the camera presence time-wise, in the past you sometimes had several girls doing a hot show in parallel followed by half an hour nothing happening, with the single camera that didn't happen hat often anymore . Regards Joker |
|
|
|
|
|
pepe84 quote:
Maybe the show last week which already above their limits, which are like age rating of 12 or less. This is the problem with ETV, no constant line. Once more allowed, the next day, it is not allowed. Everyone does basically what he wants, and the audience gets a thick neck, slowly but surely. 
|
|
|
|
|
I am looking at last night's show, you're right, "Pepe 84" I guess they really desire to destroy the night's shows, boredom can be measured in many ways, this is completely in his class, I feel sorry for is the model, how to make a decent show, viewers do not care, does not work , no.
|
|
|
|
