| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
moving cam or static cam . . . they always find a way to fuck it up
 Monday it was destroyed by hectic camera movement, tonight by bad camera placement. One week ago I liked the static camera very much, just compare what Kia did then and what she does right now. I had the hope that the static cam could be a way to overcome a little bit of the massive censorship, but they always find ways to censor every potential nice view away. Kia, Linda and Sugar show much less then usual, as if they got massive indoctrination from the staff to be cautios not to show anything hot all, because they dont have the usual control-option by cut-offs. Maybe the show last week was already above their limits, which are like age rating 12 or less. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
i am not convinced about the static camera. It´s placed in some way that is impossible a decent cam zoom effect even if the model is closer enough to the cam (which they don´t do), Look: if the model is "close" to the camera, then the 2 lines of the vip sms on the screen covers one important part of the screen. As there is no chance of camera movement to fix it, these are the results:
[hidden link - please register] [hidden link - please register] Look what i mean about the "strategic" place of the text lines: [hidden link - please register] I don´t like it, i find it boring. The show is like the cam: static. Have a good night, guys. p.s.: the static cam would be really great for a decent basic instinct show, but i fear nobody there has the balls to do it (or allow it) decently, or they are told for not doing it frontally as the cam can´t switch away to another place. |
|
|
|
|
|
imaginator55 wrote:Pantyhoses. Endless endless pantyhoses. My goodness, why would anybody dress up a pretty girl in such an ugly thing? Even worse, why would anyone dress up ALL girls like that and keep them covered for the better part of the first hour of the night show? I respect some kinky wishes every now and then but if these freaks are dominating the entire evening it is getting unbearable. Pantyhoses ? [hidden link - please register] |
|
|
|
|
Mmmmmm-----no
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
glassy wrote:I find nothing wrong with black see through pantyhose. But they do make you sweat a bit in the summer ha ha I assume most folks writing here lack your experience on this topic. Anything else about your dressing habits you'd like to share? 
|
|
|
|
|
I find nothing wrong with black see through pantyhose. But they do make you sweat a bit in the summer ha ha
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
imaginator55 wrote:Pantyhoses. Endless endless pantyhoses. My goodness, why would anybody dress up a pretty girl in such an ugly thing? Even worse, why would anyone dress up ALL girls like that and keep them covered for the better part of the first hour of the night show? I respect some kinky wishes every now and then but if these freaks are dominating the entire evening it is getting unbearable. I am not really a fan of these nylon panties either, but I also do not mind. It is peoples good right to send their wishes for things they like to see. If you want to see something different ... well ... I recommend to make use of your right to send a message. Maybe the show looks different then, but at the risk that others do not like it. Well, it is the old story. Tastes are different and if you want to change something, do something rather then to lean back and wait for changes. |
|
|
|
|
And as soon as the pantyhoses were gone, we got the next viewer torture: Wild camera movement. The request was to have the girls dance a bit crazy. Nobody asked for the cameramen to do the the same thing. Dear ETV, if you have a moving model AND a moving and zooming camera, guess what your viewers will see. Nothing, they just get seasick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pantyhoses. Endless endless pantyhoses. My goodness, why would anybody dress up a pretty girl in such an ugly thing? Even worse, why would anyone dress up ALL girls like that and keep them covered for the better part of the first hour of the night show? I respect some kinky wishes every now and then but if these freaks are dominating the entire evening it is getting unbearable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm shocked now.
One of ETV's biggest fans, the famous Marcelito just said, that he want not longer watch ETV, cause in the nightshows are not models like Cassie, Jasmine, Kat, Ginger.... His last wish was that somebody shall wake him up, if there is a change. I believe that he will have a long sleep  Goodbye Marcelito, I wish you always sweet dreams Update: He is back, what a surprise Greetings MisterWayne |
|
|
|
|
|
This 'stripping' behind the Red Curtain...it's a bit like having a ventriloquist on the radio, isn't it?
 Dreamlander |
|
|
|
tunturi wrote:Can already finish the whole Eurotica TV, tedious night shows, this week has been rock bottom, no longer able to even look at the footage, it is enough when a little gazes, let's not be missed if Eurotica TV is totally eliminated, life is more fun. Don't say that poor Stevie sent message to Nancy saying" I know you for three and a half years now and I didn't know you had a boyfriend " AAAHHH take what you want from that. |
|
|
|
|
|
Can already finish the whole Eurotica TV, tedious night shows, this week has been rock bottom, no longer able to even look at the footage, it is enough when a little gazes, let's not be missed if Eurotica TV is totally eliminated, life is more fun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ginger didnt appear to her shift at 09.00 CET, Karolina and Leila didnt appear at 12.00 CET, but Saia is there, still only 3 models in the studio
we have already seen a nightshow without camera-staff this week, maybe ETV is not able to pay their employees anymore? P.S.: after 13.00 CET filled up to 5 models with Dana and Angelina |
|
|
|
|
Videot wrote:Interesting to see that people like the static cam - in my opinion it is undiluted SHIT and the final nail in the coffin ETV is building for itself. If this is the new deal, then it's goodbye forever. to clear it up - I dont like the static cam because it is a static cam the point is that a good camerawork with pointing out the scenes, with nice zooms and intelligent and minimized use of cuts certainly would be the best solution. But the current camera-staff is absolutely not able to deliver that. In fact the moving cams, in the hand of this fumblers, destroy more than they gain in my opinion. So if they cant afford a competent technical staff it is obvious better to use static cams. It also helps a lot to get a proper technical quality, there was no pixelation at all last night. Btw.: It was the same story with the ELS. Since they dont have a static cameras anymore, they got useless and unwatchable for me. Going to moving cam with "direction" destroyed the special charme of the ELS. I remember the nice ELS from Aida, Tiffany, Kristina, Nancy . . . Today we have better resolution but the content is killed. Better give the control back to the models than to leave it in the hands of Elly, Josef, Angelina and the other "art-directors" with their amateurs at the cams. |
|
|
|
