Last night's show

I think about Brona, Evah, Carrie, Simona, Jessica, Nicole.

Franky11 wrote:It was not a bad show.
All the girls were really beautiful.
Each of them showed something more than usual.

each of them except Kate, Simona, Karry, Brona, Evah, Cleopatra & Nicole?

sorry but searching the V&Cs you'll find hotter scenes from every last night active model and also Jessica is more active and teasing in the daytime shows.

It was not a bad show.
All the girls were really beautiful.
Each of them showed something more than usual.

Watcher wrote:I'm not going to single any particular person out, just look at the "Now on ETV - The current show" thread (before the moderators get at it).

It is laughable, no, sad would be a better description, just look at the timespan of the complainers posts ... a true demonstration of addiction.
My deepest sympathies, 6 hours watching 'rubbish' just so you can continuously post that you are watching 'rubbish' .

You know, many times people complain that other people criticize shows without watching them.
So, tell me: how are they going to complain if they don't watch?

To me (since your not singling any particular person out includes me as well), it looks like a demonstration of honesty. Yes, many just complain, but many others make suggestion in order to see an improved show in the future.

What do you suggest? That we blindly praise every single show, or that, even worse, we call ETV and spend money only to let them know that the show that bad? Have we reached that level of ingenuousness already?

If you wish to do so, please feel free to consider our thoroughly watching the show as an "addiction", then I'll be free to consider an "addiction" all the continuous, unjustified praise this channel seems to garner day by day, and what a coincidence, by the very same people...

I'm not going to single any particular person out, just look at the "Now on ETV - The current show" thread (before the moderators get at it).

It is laughable, no, sad would be a better description, just look at the timespan of the complainers posts ... a true demonstration of addiction.
My deepest sympathies, 6 hours watching 'rubbish' just so you can continuously post that you are watching 'rubbish' .

nighthawk wrote:Hello,
I'm the first with a comment about the night show last night ?
I'm wondered. Very often I read a lot of criticism and maybe legitimate of it
because when a specific person was the director. (Ha... Ha... Hans)
If it was a good one nobody write it here ? I don't know.
I saw not too much from the show only the first both hours ore some minutes more
but what I watched was pretty good. The Ladies gave all their best were undressed this body painting, why not.
Hence it was showing also Julia is able to make it for a good one if she is the director.
I know it was not the first time....

If I'm the once and only who sees it in this way then it is so.
It is only my opinion and I would like to show the ladies my respect.

Greets

It is true it was a good show. The news is that it was co-directed by Gia.
It is of justice to give his part of recognition also to Gia.

Joker1305 wrote:

nighthawk wrote:Hello,
I'm the first with a comment about the night show last night ?

I was faster

[hidden link - please register]

Just the didn't want to write the same in two threads and found the other thread even more suitable

Regards
Joker

Then sorry didn't watch there.
Let's see what will happen tonight and we will read tomorrow about it.

Greets and nice night.

nighthawk wrote:Hello,
I'm the first with a comment about the night show last night ?

I was faster

[hidden link - please register]

Just the didn't want to write the same in two threads and found the other thread even more suitable

Regards
Joker

Hello,
I'm the first with a comment about the night show last night ?
I'm wondered. Very often I read a lot of criticism and maybe legitimate of it
because when a specific person was the director. (Ha... Ha... Hans)
If it was a good one nobody write it here ? I don't know.
I saw not too much from the show only the first both hours ore some minutes more
but what I watched was pretty good. The Ladies gave all their best were undressed this body painting, why not.
Hence it was showing also Julia is able to make it for a good one if she is the director.
I know it was not the first time....

If I'm the once and only who sees it in this way then it is so.
It is only my opinion and I would like to show the ladies my respect.

Greets

answer: they pay the model and the hot show is for the eyes of the cameramen and the director but not for the viewers

Question: who pays a model to do a hot show and then he does anything to hide her?

Nightshow 10.09.2011:

Gia, kate, Kia:
Marayah:

since long time this is there policy (hide and seek game) and (we will never show you what we see) and (never never what you ask to see)especially when they switch from a hot scene to show us there top model and star "ARIA".

there are enough people satisfied with the feet-collant-shoulders and creaming toes and they are providing enough income for ETV

Michael_N wrote:@brudgon and @GenaroXP
I don't agree with you. I haven't any complaints about "Little Kitty". She deserves the best praises. If we can name Gia "Queen", Scarlet - "Princess", my English is poor to find a right word to her. She is a real brilliant at ETV. But I can't say that the shower show was good. Although Elly was a director she made everything so the viewers could see little - almost nothing. It was real Hanz's style. Elly showed feet, legs, back and most of the time Kate's ass. She has a very good ass, and Kate was ready to show her full naked body but the dir didn't give her to do it. "See Kate's ass and be happy" - there was dir's motto. I hate such a directing. During all the night show Elly interrupted Kate's strip all the time, too. Elly as a director disappointed me much. IMHO.

I think the problem isn't Elly, but it's a general problem of the last days/weeks. ETV seems to be on a new soft way, even Angelina or Jane are very less fully naked. And if a model wants to show more the camera switch away.
I don't wanna say that I want all the time open legs in Calomira-style , but I really miss the hotness of the shows. Fully naked performances with some nice "oops" here and there and not these 5 sec static pussy closeups like in the last time.
And not that you misunderstand me, I don't mean that Kate should do this! I really like her slow development to become hotter, it's exact the way we need it. There are enough "full" hot models which probably would like to show more. So ETV should let the models show what they want and don't destroy their effort for a good (and hot) show! (I know that's an old theme and was often discussed)

Michael_N wrote:@brudgon and @GenaroXP
I don't agree with you. I haven't any complaints about "Little Kitty". She deserves the best praises. If we can name Gia "Queen", Scarlet - "Princess", my English is poor to find a right word to her. She is a real brilliant at ETV. But I can't say that the shower show was good. Although Elly was a director she made everything so the viewers could see little - almost nothing. It was real Hanz's style. Elly showed feet, legs, back and most of the time Kate's ass. She has a very good ass, and Kate was ready to show her full naked body but the dir didn't give her to do it. "See Kate's ass and be happy" - there was dir's motto. I hate such a directing. During all the night show Elly interrupted Kate's strip all the time, too. Elly as a director disappointed me much. IMHO.

you're right...your point is right but for me was a great show...then...director decide what we see? well and kate was magnificient for those director had decide for what we must see...so kate director
but one thing...i don't know why director decide...maybe one day i will understand