| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
Last night show I still believe they screwed up completely, especially in the second half. OK, costumes were excellent, so it is clear which people deserve great words: Scarlet was nice and sexy,...but what about everything else? So poor. I was too damn soft for a nightshow. Scarlet however did nicely even if they screwed already at 2300 CET when she had panties under the clothes...well for those who ask, yes I would do better, as did ETV in times of Malena, Donna, Larissa, Elza Tamara, Selena and company...Compared to those shows this one was miserable, compared to 2011 average it was above it all. But still for my taste only an excuse not to do hot striptease shows as did Janine 2 nights ago .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turned on the show last night and thought I was watching
Jackie Chan Meets Bollywood  It was a very good concept for a show, and some of the girls were perfect in their roles.Scarlet was the star last night, with some great interaction with Amy and Mashi  Tia, Kristina and Claudia looked perfect in their Japanese/ Chinese costumes  The woman playing the beggar in the background played her part really well 
|
|
|
|
|
|
As usual, many of you complaining about the show scarlet and for me it was very good show, they would you do better? probably not
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last night was a very hot one!! Unfortunately I must say last night not all girl´s have convince me
 but in the overall it was a very good show! But actually I don`t know in wich hotness level we have seen was it a eight a nine or the full ten?? At last I hope that we would see the same hot show next monday than I´m sure that we would see some of the girl´s from last night than it is the 3rd "Amy´s Show"
|
|
|
|
|
|
with this team they can only do this?
 the show of the banality .... Scarlet, Gia, Tia, Mashiara .... how sad to see them reduced to a switchboard operator!
|
|
|
|
|
I forgot to mention earlier how pleased I was to see Jonas send an sms complaining about not getting the show he should have got from the model. There was a slight improvement in coverage of the models after that with the cameras getting in closer--but--- the vision mixer must learn to slow down. 2 or 3 seconds on a model before moving to another is not worth paying for. Its amazing how there are so many people almost screaming at Eurotic telling them what the paying caller wants from a show--but they just carry on as if they are doing a wonderfull job--its crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
glassy wrote:Honestly---they just get better and better at getting worse !! It was more interesting to watch the Undertaker increasing his Wrestlemania streak 19-0 this night!
|
|
|
|
|
Wasn't it a great idea to place that large red set of anal beads right at the front of the studio last night blocking views of the models at the back. Honestly---they just get better and better at getting worse !! Thank god for Lias ass last night--and mmm-that was it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The problem of the shows are not the models, the problem are the show directors who are very successful to destroy the shows not considering the wishes of the viewers.
 So it was last night show with Vicky. Look to my post in the thread "Natasha". |
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is not the number of models but they do see. In a channel called eurotic tv shows I would like to see hot girls and not get bored and a camera is there to do that when you see something move girls dressed up ... What sense does it pay to make calls and send text messages to Oten not anything that you ask? On the internet at lower prices you get so much more ... I liked ETV broadcast for several months but I can not watch it, stay tuned to maximum 30 minutes but when I see that every night is worse than change, and I watch a movie ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crazyforgia wrote:GenaroXP wrote:zen_master wrote:inviting almost nine models in a night show is not a good idea, I agree with you. But the reality is that ETV is in serious trouble and they believe that increasing the number of models in the studio automatically increases the number of customers. It is needless to say that this equation, as we saw last night, does not work. They never realized that many customers watching the show and calls only for the quality of the models in the studio and for what these girls were able to make and transmit. The truth is that they do not have the technical (capable directors, cameras, ideas and imagination) and economic possibilities to keep nine models in the studio and allow them to do a really interesting show (you have to pay the models and if you want they do more then you must pay more) so the result is just a big mess, a very trivial show, bored models and a complete lack of entertainment. So customers decrease. As usual they will take a long time to understand. |
|
|
|
|
|
GenaroXP wrote:zen_master wrote:inviting almost nine models in a night show is not a good idea, You express exactly what I feel! With nine models in a show it's impossible to give the models enough camera-time to give a good show and this fast moving camera destroys every erotic moment.  Also it's frustrating for the models when they want to start a good show and the cam is moving away again and again ... |
|
|
|
|
|
As has been said below, there were nine models in last night's show ...
It seems, from the Models thread, that Gia and Scarlet were the only two worth mentioning ... ... for mentioning read complaining about in at least one case ... |
|
|
|
|
|
zen_master wrote:inviting almost nine models in a night show is not a good idea, Yes nine are too much,I think seven models as a maximum in a nightshow on friday and saturday are enough and in all other nightshows in the week only six models,I think on that way we would have more from the show when the camera hasn´t so much targets to show and than maybe the camera would not so often switch from one model to an other so very fast!! |
|
|
|
|
|
inviting almost nine models in a night show is not a good idea,
the camera is rolling from one model to another in less than 5 seconds. that`s why gia was so tedious lastnight.because she didn`t get too much of being captured by the camera...
|
|
|
