| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
shagshaggy wrote:Daytime premium show Angelina Roshana Penelope and Tallona very poor but for Tallona naked yes poor camerawork yes. But but but she has not shaved and so has a nice bush. Not worth watching the show for I say wait for next one . Not too shy but she needs a chance. oh its Tallona not Penelope that needs time there be bush Hooray, about time too 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daytime premium show Angelina Roshana Penelope and Tallona very poor but for Tallona naked yes poor camerawork yes. But but but she has not shaved and so has a nice bush. Not worth watching the show for I say wait for next one . Not too shy but she needs a chance. oh its Tallona not Penelope that needs time
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Dreamlander thanks for your reply it is good that you are apparently better informed than ETV!
I know that it is different costs according to the payment but it does not match their price differential applicable to ETV Chefen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
chefen wrote:BIG PROMOTION The prices are different because the amount ETV gets charged for using the services is different. It's the same for all adult websites and the payment services they have to use. If you think most of your hard earned money ends up in ETV's bank account then you are sadly mistaken. It's similar for the phone service providers too. If someone from a Farsi speaking country calls a girl at ETV via a mobile, they earn almost nothing from it after the tech. companies have taken their slice. As with most things, the middlemen, in this case the service or payment providers, earn most from 'adult' services. If PayPal allowed 'adult' payments then companies like ETV would earn more and be able to charge less for more profit. Unfortunately, although PayPal allow almost every gambling website to use their services, they won't allow 'adult' sites to. I would suggest that gambling websites cause more financial, personal and relationship problems to their users than 'adult' sites ever do but there's never any reasoning with US sites and their skewed morals. Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
BIG PROMOTION
large cheating Why do the prices in dollars for card payments and euro by sofort banking is to cover up an overpriced by card rates are much lager using cards than sofort banking but they offer, not all countries opportunities for sofort banking I asked ETV but do not reply Chefen |
|
|
|
|
stegiato wrote:What the hell the twins are doing?? but anybody at Etv see what crap they're selling to the viewers? unbelievable this is the lowest point of etv. Kelly got a request in the after hour for nude show and completed it. It a funny old world |
|
|
|
|
|
|
What the hell the twins are doing?? but anybody at Etv see what crap they're selling to the viewers? unbelievable this is the lowest point of etv.
|
|
|
|
Wilsonsand wrote:i want to focuss some attention to the decline of the nudity on some models on daytime exclusive shows: the topless club girls is joined for totally agree with you, Dacota was a big surprise for me last week when she casually mentioned that she 'keeps panties on' now, just before wasting my 4 credits on a tame topless show. Didnt know Zoe had gone the same, at least I wont waste my time there for now. and yet some girls are still great ie Kia, Saiqa to name but two, and the likes of Kristal have gone from topless to being happy to show everything (literally ) I can't understand it at all. I think it has to do with ETV somehow, with some crazy idea of having some girls go soft and some go hard, and then in a few months, maybe swap. Problem is, by then, a lot of viewers will have been too annoyed and left.its strange, that's for sure, also, is it worth the mod moving Wilsonsand and this post to the main thread? Just an idea. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ETV WRESTLING Eighth-finals - Furious Kristina vs Linda
The worst of the worst.A true disaster.Quality more than mediocre.No erotism.These shows are to avoid absolutely.Annoying from start to finish.I waited for a poor show, but not at this level.  
|
|
|
|
|
|
ETV WRESTLING Eighth-finals - Furious Kristina vs Linda
The worst of the worst.A true disaster.Quality more than mediocre.No erotism.These shows are to avoid absolutely.Annoying from start to finish.I waited for a poor show, but not at this level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah great analisys, i only think that if the girls are in contrast with Etv for sure they would be fired, so probably is a marketing decision that i can' t understand but there so many things that i don't understand regarding ETV...
|
|
|
|
|
|
i want to focuss some attention to the decline of the nudity on some models on daytime exclusive shows: the topless club girls is joined for
* girls who are not willing to make the full nudity step: Stella, Effy, Marla. * girls who were hot models doing hot full naked shows all the time in the past, and they refuse to do it anymore: Penelope, Tara, * and now...unfortunately, some other models and newbies who suddenly has decided to stop doing it: Elmar, Dacota, Zoe and even Kelly who was making some full naked shows with her sister. I don´t understand what is happening with this. Zoe was doing pretty brave and now she is shy? the shows of Elmar is unrecognizably soft, and Dacota and her sister are now making soft topless crap shows. Dacota was last friday in the Exclusive Wish for Free several hours completely naked without problems, but she stopped making full naked shows in daytime some time ago. It seems to me that some models don´t agree with ETV policy of payments for making full nudity or don´t receive enough incentives for making it, so they stop, the result is some shows are really really poor and too soft. |
|
|
|
|
I think that some of the girls are happy to reveal all, and its the directors and cameramen that are shy from showing too much. But some of the girls also make it seem like they are happy to reveal all, but are careful to use angles that dont show anything. Sometimes you will see the girls checking which angles are being used and suddenly moving to hide themselves. And then again, sometimes it seems the cameras are used to almost get angles the girls aren't aware of. I guess its just down to who the director is, who is the cameraman, and which girl it is.
I've even seen a girl doing an exclusive, with one camera showing quite a lot of revealing angles, but the other behaving very shy and avoiding angles that show less than the other camera, Sometimes its bizarre I think that lately, the views are higher level than a few months ago, with some of the girls, but some girls are still way too shy for this kind of show. Totally agree with the 2nd part , if you do an exclusive then you should be happy to do the levels needed. Same applies to the Friday show or similar premium shows, if you're not happy doing the levels needed, then don't do the show. its that simple. I do think that on occasions in the past, ETV have put girls on a Friday night show that clearly shouldn't have been because its known to all that they don't do the levels needed. On these occasions, the girls should have said no, the directors should have said no, because the viewers clearly indicated in the shows, that it should have been a no. Above all else, I do think that the girls that aren't happy to reveal themselves, should not, and in some cases, shouldn't be on the show. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:did anybody ever consider that also the girls are making the rules and set the limits ? Yeah i Thought about it, and I respect their will, my doubt is about Kia, Saya, Kris, Lauren Jasmine and many others did they set the limit to camera to escape when they're doing a great show and ruin all they're doing? In second part if u work in an hot exclusive or Premium show and u fear naked scene i think you're in the wrong place, as if Hamilton fears fast cars... |
|
|
|
15102004 wrote:it's funny that someone criticizes people who want "free stuff" in TV and in the same time he also is one of the best fan of "wish for free" Just in case you mean me Yes I'm a fan of 'wishes for free', which you pay to watch There is no such thing as free, I refer to free loaders and/or those that do not pay, as the ones that do the most shouting on this forum and yet they constantly claim to never spend a penny on the channel, so they want something for nothing and whinge when its not what they want. its laughable and in regards to F1, there's still no such things as free. F1 is not free. if you watch it on TV in the UK, you pay a TV license fee, if over the internet, then you pay a service provider for internet access. as for ETV. To be fair, they are a business and they are there to make money (a shock to some forum readers) so we cant expect them to produce a show as we want it without wanting some form of payment. and as for that quote: We keep the level of nudity in our programmes as low as possible without strong explicit scenes and not to overstep our aesthetic criteria. The erotic levels of the content can be atdjusted to suit the needs of our partners and in accordance to the laws and regulations present in the airing country. That is why, while being erotic, sexy and provocatively-interesting, our content is appropriate for very large audience and is quite acceptable for night programmes even in relatively conservative TV stations. that's just an example of bad English, its should surely mean that they keep the level of nudity as high as possible without being too strong for some of the partners and applicable laws, although I suggest that on occasions, the show would be safe for mainstream TV the only thing that is free, is the air that we breathe, and free thought
|
|
|
|
