| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
Dreamlander wrote:I'm glad it wasn't just me having tech problems then. this is the part you missed qt guys, the videostream is absolutely fucked up. It is jumping back and forth uqt sent while Alice was there maybe 'fucked' has been censored and they couldn't figure what I meant  Slow |
|
|
|
|
|
Watcher wrote:Congratulations to the inventive use of technical effects ... I'm glad it wasn't just me having tech problems then.  It's been doing it for most of the day. A few minutes ago, Alice picked up the microphone to answer some messages and that part disappeared completely, only returning to see her put the microphone back down.  They are aware of it because Alice then mentioned it in a follow up to another message I sent. It is an easy fix as long as the right person who knows about it is there but it appears they aren't on a Sunday. I was talking to Jade once and she was trying on different outfits for me and she asked me which one I preferred each time (Obviously ALL of them, it is Jade afterall ) but I could never see her wearing the outfit she was talking about. She got frustrated, said something to someone behind the camera and in a few seconds the stream snapped back to a 'live' broadcast. So it must be a 'reset' or something that is needed. Luckily I didn't call today, just messaged, as that would have been really frustrating if it happened to me again. You can't refresh your own page because it cuts your call off. I believe that's what Alice's caller did a few times today just from her reactions to getting cut off, it seems.Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
|
Watcher wrote:Congratulations to the inventive use of technical effects ... seems to me they gave up on the tech gimmicks |
|
|
|
|
|
Congratulations to the inventive use of technical effects ...
Not only do we see the model in the fitting room and the main studio at the same time but we have now enjoyed several minutes of instant transformations between Elmar and Jessyca ... Quite bizarre yet strangely enjoyable ...
|
|
|
|
kolokotronis wrote:bigboy24 wrote:I think the leg-toner show of Jeit was unique and they won't repeat it. They are going out on a limb below ok, did any one see the trailer on the Matrix with Angelina where they wrote many more hot scenes and more close ups , it was the case of Jeit but then no more,so I got drawn in to the first show which was superb but what happened since is what Im complaining about. So the best of luck with Alice show plenty of feet amd she like some of the goalkeepers flapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bigboy24 wrote:If I see the total downloads in the video sections for eurotic there isn't any kind of Brona video. off topic comment: the one who created more than 100 accounts to push his favourites in the ranking of the models page spoiled the download counter of the video section, too. you see at some models an average download counter at 2.000 - 3.000 dls except 3 videos with 30.000 - 40.000 download although these vids don't seem to be more interesting than the others with less dls. also depends the download counter often on the time that the link is shown on the homepage and of course when the vid was added to the video section, too. furthermore are not vids for every model added or the average number for all models isn't the same. so you wouldn't find a Brona vid in the Top 10 but probably with more dls than most vids of other models. my comment about dls is based on my own experience in the past when the only OCH question was either MU or RS and when Brona was showing some underwear and the other models and their private parts were shown by the director and camera staff. so a comment given by experience of posting etv vids for some years. 
|
|
|
|
|
If I see the total downloads in the video sections for eurotic there isn't any kind of Brona video.
Maybe her oops at the pole is the hit. I can really understand because noone expect this. But maybe I don't know or see anything. In the old days let's say 2006 or 2007 all the pussyshows where the most downloaded videos. But you don't see for example any doggystyle video from 3 girls in a row really filmed from behind anymore this is gone. It's true most of the videos today are not so interesting even if the girls are naked you simply know what is possible and what is certainly not. So some oopses from so called soft girls are more interesting because you are not expect it. the surprise is always interesting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
shagshaggy wrote:my question is to everyone what are you looking at premiums for? I cannot answer for any etv Premiums but I can give an answer for fta shows in the past or webshows nowadays: the pure pussy shot or dildo working is in 98% of the cases boring and also the asking for VIPs or tokens (that's annoying, too). to get some seconds, mins, hours or days (in very few cases weeks, month or years, too) attention from the viewer (in this case: my attention) a model must be a mix of interesting and beautiful and some kind of cleverness could be added, too. interesting can be a special look or a special way of teasing and beautiful isn't necessarily the look of a Perfect 10 but a mix of her look, the way she moves, all her gestures or charisma. some models seem to be perfect and in the next moment they start talking or a webcam model who is too drunk and starts to insults the not tippers, these are examples for the point cleverness (here: missing cleverness) and what I don't wanna see. to explain it completely would take hours or days but in short I'd say that a model must be interesting with some charisma and if she's beautiful and nude it's welcome, too. but it's not the pure pussy nor the pair of tits in close up. I cannot answer what all viewers want to see but I can answer what many video downloaders prefer and according to the download stats a dressed (and probably sitting) Brona in the afternoon is for many more interesting than the pussy of Angelina or Claudia in the night. PS: maybe an add because of the current discussion in the Roshana DC (aka Karry DC II or Gia DC III) according to the download counter most viewers want to see something new and not the same for the 1000th time. so I'd assume the the first night show vids of Selena and Charley get the same or more downloads than the last Roshana vids. |
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:... This may be right to some extent, but I don't think it's the whole truth, because I don't believe in the coincidence that girls who showed much more in night shows some years ago (Kia, Tia, Claudia, Sabrina etc.,as in nostalgia thread) suddenly became semi-nuns by their own free will in night shows and web shows. |
|
|
|
bigboy24 wrote:I think the leg-toner show of Jeit was unique and they won't repeat it. If someone read here comments is easy to understand that etv want to fool viewers. Nothing dont forgot jeit, no mistake there, only a way to fool viewers to buy next shows. And ofcource most viewers wants , pussy shows, and good camera, if want to imaginate, havent to pay credits for that isnt it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
shagshaggy wrote:Slowfox wrote:shagshaggy wrote:Ok i have better ones "why panties doing on" during the leg toner of course calm down, sir |
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:shagshaggy wrote:Ok i have better ones "why panties doing on" during the leg toner my question is to everyone what are you looking at premiums for? as Kristina said last night "guys you have fresh meat here tonight." I want pussy ass tits but a change from the usual standing up naked. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
bigboy24 wrote:I think the leg-toner show of Jeit was unique and they won't repeat it. believe it, or not, the girls decide how far they want to go or how careless they want to be some even go nuts on the crew when there has been shown too much against all agreements, and trust in the camera operator and vision mixer, not to speak the director. Slow |
|
|
|
|
I think the leg-toner show of Jeit was unique and they won't repeat it.
it was just more then they normally broadcast and it was surely beyond there normal censorship. I don't know if the girls don't want or ETV don't want and I don't want to guess. Maybe it was a mistake and Jeit forgot something in a hurry but this is also just guessing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
shagshaggy wrote:Ok i have better ones "why panties doing on" during the leg toner yep, I know, whether it is a good show or not for most of the viewers depends on the pussy count
|
|
|
