Author | Posts |
---|---|
Hello Gentlemen,
May I ask you members of this forum an impertinent question about the Premium Show of tonight April - Elma which splits in three features as before. Are there 4 credits to pay each show or in total you pay just 4 credits? Sorry for my ignorance but it's first time I'm interested to these uniting and combination of different shows as I'm one of April fans. Thanks JohnGuitar |
|
|
|
Wow! notice how fast ETV has run to post the praises for today´s premium shows in the wall!!!
what about yesterday shows, ETV? i don´t see any comments!!! we all know why. |
|
|
|
I manly agree with Joker, unless for a thing (that's why I won't click his post), loosing their job at ETVShow would be best news for models.
Or do they manage to do this job for their whole lives? There are some models who have worked there since 7 years. |
|
|
|
littlebox wrote:To comply with the models you should not buy their show ...... so 'you are doing them complicit in creating these squalid situations .... on TV would never happen' cause they're afraid of the judgments and immediate right and can not cheat but then again .... the first responsibility (and here there are so many ....) are the ones that give them the opportunity 'to create these situations shameful ....... let an examination of conscience .. ....What ever one does, one does it wrong. If nobody spends money on ETV the girls will lose their job. Not a nice situation there at the moment either. But the girls aren't supposed to be too bashful, otherwise they wouldn't strip on TV, so they are supposed survive that. Shit happens, a show can fail, no matter if it's a FTA or a premium. The real embarassing thing is the comment of ETV. It was ETVs fault. Apparently they set up a show with girls who in my opinion don't fit together and with a theme that obviously didn't fit to the girls' talents (or no theme at all, I haven't watched). And then saying, "Sorry, the girls weren't in the condition" that's insolent. But that's not the fault of those who watched the show. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
To comply with the models you should not buy their show ...... so 'you are doing them complicit in creating these squalid situations .... on TV would never happen' cause they're afraid of the judgments and immediate right and can not cheat but then again .... the first responsibility (and here there are so many ....) are the ones that give them the opportunity 'to create these situations shameful ....... let an examination of conscience .. ....
|
|
|
|
Why must everything be specified the model.
The model is of a own head. The set and everything looks very unprofessional. |
|
|
|
brokingbull wrote:From their news section: hallelujah they finally woke up |
|
|
|
From their news section:
Credits Refund Tuesday, 26th Mar 2013 The Poetry of the Body Brown and Irra In one word: We have some stupid directors, camerapeople, cutters and rules and we know we deliver bad shows for much money. So this time we were at lowest level ever and we decided to refund the money because even we are deeply ashamed of our greed. Sorry, dear fans. |
|
|
|
JBGOOD wrote:From the [hidden link - please register] bankruptcy |
|
|
|
From the [hidden link - please register]
THIS WEEKEND Tuesday, 26th Mar 2013 This WEEKEND Only! It`s the Reserved Cheaper phone calls weekend! Choose the best time for you and your favorite model and write us. And hour or two even the whole day- you decide! The great Reserved Cheaper phone call discount is for all of you! What does it mean? According to the schedule Sunday is the MashiKarry Webday! What kind of "gift" in our web-egg? |
|
|
|
What they have done has no words. All my respect to Brown and Irra. I must say i didn´t buy the shows, (none of the models are of my taste) but anyway, ETV can´t leave the models (moreover, and so new models) publicly exposed this way. This sentence is horrible:
"The models were not in condition and could not cope with their actor’s tasks" why leave them in a such bad position? it´s a shame. Are they actresses? they pretend they are actresses? they were not in condition? please, maybe a british guy can tell me what they exactly mean.. why they were not in condition? Why not just saying: "the show was not the show we wanted to do and we failed" and that´s all? "The models are young ladies who still don’t have a profession. " even Aria, Kiara, Kia or Eliza? really? "Why not the things they do can’t be their profession?" the thing is if do the things badly, i am a bad professional, and maybe it´s because i have no talent for it or maybe i don´t have any preparation for doing it. ETV thinks experience make professionals, regardless the talent or the preparation: "we also believe that each one of them has a talent, charm and artistic inspiration that can be developed with hard work and consistency. "Well, ETV, maybe i can sing every night at home and in a karaoke, but i will never be Freddy Mercury because i have not that talent, i have not that voice, so i can sing as often as I please, everyday, but it won´t make me a singer,at least a good singer if i have not the talent, good voice or at least a little singing education to not being out of tune. So, you can make the girls do thousands of premium shows, but it won´t become them on actresses, and the more important thing: if the result ist not good, it´s not their fault, it´s yours. Let them to do their job, let them offering the best of themselves, let them make it, and forget those stupid scripts, that stupid pretensions and definitely try to understand your studio is not a theater stage, the models are not actresses and you are not artistic creators. Stop it, please, and respect the models once in your life. |
|
|
|
ibrahimovic wrote:etv wall overheating right now Where on the wall? I must be blind... |
|
|
|
etv wall overheating right now
|
|
|
|
lucifer70 wrote:malmaisons wrote:lucifer70 wrote:Oh my god, these are not pics taken from an erotic show, but a museum of horrors!... seems as if at least one paying viewer was found you leave me puzzled if you didn't watch - who has got his credits refunded then ? But to get as serious now as you want me to be: I understand that it's a matter of pride not to be mixed up with people who pay for premium parody - I didn't want to offend anybody (not even the ones who really watched). I just wanted to express that in my opinion these two girls are a complete miscast for shows like this and that I couldn't believe that somebody was willing to pay 3 x 4 credits for this strange evening amusement. It's not the girls fault, though - just another bad decision by ETV staff and management ... |
|
|
|
"The models were not in condition and could not cope with their actor’s tasks."
actor’s tasks Now, that is the big misunderstanding between ETV and their viewers compressed in one sentence. |
|
|