| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
stanislavskji wrote:if you leave a model without objects, without calls, without requests, only with her body to make the show, I think is really difficult do something "soft". I agree.I can't comment on April's show because I didn't see it. But I did see Elmar in the same show the evening before. She kept her pants on throughout but stretched and pulled them to destruction, giving glimpses of everything but without showing everything. i have no idea if it was "soft" or not but I found it very entertaining. Maybe she could teach some of the other models the forgotten art of tease. |
|
|
|
|
I dont know why Penelope has never been as I remember in the Premium Show
ever since duration of this program. She has an incredible body which is one of the best work of art, fit and healthy among ETV girls. JohnGuitar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tifosi wrote:Slowfox wrote:I can naturally only speak for me and in my opinion.. I'm sure that if someone offered constructive criticism, with justification of their stance, then a meaningful discussion would take place. As you say, "... one lives in hope  "
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:I can naturally only speak for me and in my opinion.. Exactly, which is the way it should be, we all have our own views and thoughts on the shows. The one problem I have with this site, is if you go into a model's discussion room and critisise, then her fans go apeshit and say stay out of her room. Weird stuff for a discussion thread. Still, one lives in hope
|
|
|
|
|
|
brokingbull wrote:Slowfox wrote:........................ unfortunately I do not get the correlation between your comment and mine  what has the earlier presence of the viewers to do with censorship and the introduction or amendment of same ? to avoid a discussion on that I will ignore your question whether or not I like the clips of vector, as it is not your business. p.s.: which of the shows you do not watch were hot ? |
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:........................ But we viewers were here at that place before the big censor  came around here...... ps: It seems you don't like the nice shows posted last days/weeks by Vector? pps: And etv can do explicit, erotic and nice shows!!! But why only 1 or 2 in 4 weeks? |
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:Censorship or 'regulations' are adding their part, that some people do not like what they get to see as they want more. It has been said more then once and on various occasions that explicit shows are not the aim and those who are still expecting this are wrong at that place. I guess it is fair enough as basically they tell you not to waste your money in case you expect the more explicit. really, I wrote something different. if you leave a model without objects, without calls, without requests, only with her body to make the show, I think is really difficult do something "soft". we all know Etv dont want explicit, but with this hot/cold show they thinked a type of show perfect for the explicit (in explicit model can deserve only her body) but for me a very bad idea for a soft show. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below is a bit too technical for me, so bear with me please.
I can naturally only speak for me and in my opinion the show(s) were not too bad, certainly nothing really spectacular but still some nice entertainment. The concept of these shows is based on request of viewers who basically asked for that, i.e. drop the art thing at least for once and let the girls do what they want or feel. Censorship or 'regulations' are adding their part, that some people do not like what they get to see as they want more. It has been said more then once and on various occasions that explicit shows are not the aim and those who are still expecting this are wrong at that place. I guess it is fair enough as basically they tell you not to waste your money in case you expect the more explicit. The amateur style. Well, I tend to even like that. Who in this world is or does perfect ? And such mishaps imho are kind of funny adding, at least for me, to the overall entertainment. Slow |
|
|
|
|
|
What a luck I didn't buy the April-show.
Censorship could be smelled in 1000 km distance...   The artist-boss at etv can't do 3 good shows in a row..... And after that mess they removed Ava from els to the fta-white-circles nightshow...
|
|
|
|
|
well, i just saw April's premium, and im really perplexed about the "construction" chosed for these hot/cold shows.
only a girl on a platform and nothing else. no "screenplay", nothing to use (i think for example oil, ice or some other clothes..), no requests to fullfill or messages to reply. April was nude in less than half an hour, and then for me it was really clear she was in difficulty to think something to pass the second half of the show. she could only tossing and turning continously on the platform, and the only thing she could do to make something "hot" was to glimpse occasionally her p**sy. now, i really dont understand why a site that has always emphasized they dont want to make show of explicit nude, can make a model in condition to only use her p**sy to carry on a show. obviously i liked these glimpses , but they were drowned in a boring show, and anycase incoherent whit etv policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JohnGuitar wrote:asoert wrote:what about the pictures and videos i download did it requires any credits? Exception: if you have bought the show live, the video is free. |
|
|
|
asoert wrote:what about the pictures and videos i download did it requires any credits? Of course my friend, you have to disburse some coins. Nobody does anything for nothing JohnGuitar |
|
|
|
|
|
what about the pictures and videos i download did it requires any credits?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
you're free to spend it when and where you want
|
|
|
|
|
thanks i have another one when i have a credits does they force me to see any premium or i choose which one i see and which one i don t see ?
|
|
|
|
