Eurotic's website & webstream

Johnnymo wrote:Tuesday 12th February 2013 - 20:00 CET - Evah and Brona - Premium Live SHOW!!!!!

= I'll be off for moderating from tuesday 20.00 cet till thursday.

Tuesday 12th February 2013 - 20:00 CET - Evah and Brona - Premium Live SHOW!!!!!

Excuse me if I interrupt, but is there anything substantial on the horizon here?
The topic is "Eurotic's website & webstream", I suggest you guys solve your personal stuff via PM.

And while we´re at it: if you quote someone, quote him correctly. You can leave out what is not important
for the meaning of a qoute, but you may not change it.
All (willingly) incorrect quotes will be deleted from now on without further notice.

Thank you

Feed the trashcan with more trash makes the rubbish not more attractive!

Chris26 wrote:

nighthawk wrote:Where did you find the word of "blabla" in my post ?
Cannot remember that I have written this.

But thanks for your fast reply, someones haven't to do other things....

You're welcome, rest assured that I dedicate to this matter only scamples of time.
I certainly have less time than someone who feels the need to dig up an incredibly old post only to attack another member. Twice in like 1 hour and a half.

I thought that "blabla" was a nice summary considering that it would've been heavy for the eyes to quote the whole post. You're free to disagree!

I'll wait some minutes to see if there are any more ticks to be made on my checklist, then I'll head to bed, thanks for worrying about my time anyway!

Yeap, the answer I've expected.
Your second scentence explains what I meant. I have a life outside here and of the channel but some days I'm here and read, read and read, or call it to follow the history.
Haha I'm good in digging out special things, like "Heinrich Schliemann" who discovered the the ancient place of Troy.

Hey, if you feel attacked by this one cheap and funny meant coment of mine, you can tell what you want but it explains who is your mentor

I'm curious about the taking of time it needs before I get your answer. Take time you have it and more than 30 seconds

Best Regards

nighthawk wrote:Where did you find the word of "blabla" in my post ?
Cannot remember that I have written this.

But thanks for your fast reply, someones haven't to do other things....

You're welcome, rest assured that I dedicate to this matter only scamples of time.
I certainly have less time than someone who feels the need to dig up an incredibly old post only to attack another member. Twice in like 1 hour and a half.

I thought that "blabla" was a nice summary considering that it would've been heavy for the eyes to quote the whole post. You're free to disagree!

I'll wait some minutes to see if there are any more ticks to be made on my checklist, then I'll head to bed, thanks for worrying about my time anyway!

outside wrote:Sorry for you popcorn, Chris, but I won't waste my time at replying.

some true words,

too much time is being wasted with too much rubbish.

Sorry for you popcorn, Chris, but I won't waste my time at replying.

It would be anyway interesting to know more about that "smiler" whose post smelled of molvanian from miles away.

Chris26 wrote:

nighthawk wrote:blabla

"Petty banter" and "a bunch of old ladies" are not polite expressions.

For the rest, keep going, just wait a sec so I can get some popcorns first.

EDIT: Are you sure you're not secretly in love with outside instead of your *WONDERFUL*MASHIARA*? It seems like every post you make as of late is directed to him, even when he just writes a good comment about Tia's return and wishing her to stay there for just a little time.

Where did you find the word of "blabla" in my post ?
Cannot remember that I have written this.

But thanks for your fast reply, someones haven't to do other things....

nighthawk wrote:blabla

"Petty banter" and "a bunch of old ladies" are not polite expressions.

For the rest, keep going, just wait a sec so I can get some popcorns first.

EDIT: Are you sure you're not secretly in love with outside instead of your *WONDERFUL*MASHIARA*? It seems like every post you make as of late is directed to him, even when he just writes a good comment about Tia's return and wishing her to stay there for just a little time.

outside wrote:

Smiler wrote:OK you guys. You've made your point. There is a small ' band of brothers' out there that aren't happy with ETV. And they are voicing their dislike on this forum and they are beginning to sound like a bunch of old ladies.
ETV (FTA) is a good program. They have nice models and it is free. If it is not presented the way you would like to see it, then bad luck. Watch another channel. But you know you won't find anything that comes close to it for entertainment.
The ETVshow.com has had a few problems and they have accepted that and I think it will get better in time. It is a business and of course they are out to make money. So for a few credits you can see the girls you like best in a more private show. Some of the exclusive shows have been great. And I agree, some not so good. I don't need to mention the models names but they are ordinary women doing what I would think is a hard and demanding job. Stop insulting them. If you want more spice in your viewing, then go and visit the cam sites. It will cost you a lot more.
But whatever, stop all this petty banter you have been putting out. We are tired of hearing it.

Smiler

I could answer you in ETVShow (and his hardest fanboys, I don't know what group are you from, sure one between them, same pre-printed cards answers) way, "if you don't like some comments, simply please don't read it".
I am tired the same as you about hearing fanboys, but I am more tolerant.
BTW, sorry to disappoint you, but I'm going to countinue, of course respecting the rules of the site.
And you are insulting people who think differently than you in the same way as people you have blamed.
P.S. You say "we"? Could you please explain who you are representing?

I have been quite here for a long time and it has been right.
Sometimes it takes lomger a bit but now I discovred this and let me compare the comment of "Sir Smiler" and the given answer of some one.

Hi Smiler, Sir

your comment contains exactly what I think. It is written in a polite way and you have my great respect. You told us your opinion and what you think.
Sir Smiler you said we. Yes you have the right to say "WE" because the pronoun of two people in the first case of plural is "WE".
Don't worry that you could be alone. Maybe we are a minority here but it is much better to be a member of the rebell alliance.
Don't get shy to tell us what you think. Heh we have some experts here they judge about being a post is good or bad when they compare the number of cilicks of the thanks button... Oh maybe that would be better placed in "Some Fun And Jokes" but it is the truth...

@ Out...

If you go into a fashion shop what do you expect? To can by food ? Ha Ha Ha.
Okay you accused Sir Smiley to be intolerant and not accept other opinions.
Hm, quite the opposite is right. You offend all they are satisfied with the channel and talk about them behind their back in your special place...
All they have another oppionion get banned from... and you try to explain us anything about tolerance ?

Switch on your brain Mr, Outside !!!

Best Regards To Sir Smiler And The Whole Community

Slowfox wrote:interesting approach, but it would be the same if you go to the cinema to watch the newest block buster and are not willing to pay for it, prior you know exactly what it is about, what is going on and how it ends.

With the difference that if a movie sucks, after a few days there are lots of sites (and critics) bashing it and earnings plummet down because nobody goes to watch it anymore.
Should we try this approach also with ETV?

Anyway, think about, for example, a show starring Rose, Alice or Tiffany.
Imagine the number of people who would purchase such a show.
Now imagine if ETV clearly stated that they are not going to show their pussies (just to make an example).
Do you think that the number would be the same?

And would these people be to blame? Not in my opinion.

EDIT: Actually, that might help ETV. If they clearly state, for example, that model "X" is not going to show her pussy, the show is bound to be purchased only by people who would enjoy it and buy it either way, and people who would not like it would not buy it. Problem solved.
But...

Chris26 wrote:This is a problem that will never be solved.
Both sides have perfectly fine justifications: "You know the price before you buy and there are no guarantees so it's your fault", or "I have to pay in advance to see a show, sometimes with little to no details about it, so I want it to be on par with my expectations and if it's not I will complain".

The only way to solve this would be to explicitly state beforehand who is going to show what, but for obvious reasons they are not going to do that.

interesting approach, but it would be the same if you go to the cinema to watch the newest block buster and are not willing to pay for it, prior you know exactly what it is about, what is going on and how it ends.

infact as i said it' s my fault to think that this could be a good one.
But i'm also curious to see if someone liked it, i think i wasn't the only one to watch it

Listen to a moderator (and to a former moderator who agrees).

Tarl_Cabot wrote:so stay away from etv web shows, it's simply not their business and with the usual no effort of etv it will never become a good web shows business.

I've said it should be put in the site header.