| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
15102004 wrote:As far as i can see the time of the callers is closer to the end, in WEB shows they don't need callers, sms senders, or any other form of interactivity that they continue to have just to compensate the lack of viewers, so IMHO when the TV shows will finish the core business of ETV will no longer in offering a virtual friendship/love by phone but in selling shows, easy, cheaper, and more profitable.Well, no doubt web shows are a different kind of business. If it can or will replace the FTA broadcast we will see, actually for me there's currently no hint they'll finish soon, usually before a business comes to an end there start several attempts to save it, but the concept of the nightshows is pretty constant for quite a while. Independent from this question my comments were only regarding the FTA broadcast, there in my opinion it's difficult to establish a new business model which provides good shows for free or at least for a very low contribution of each viewer. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
|
|
As far as i can see the time of the callers is closer to the end, in WEB shows they don't need callers, sms senders, or any other form of interactivity that they continue to have just to compensate the lack of viewers, so IMHO when the TV shows will finish the core business of ETV will no longer in offering a virtual friendship/love by phone but in selling shows, easy, cheaper, and more profitable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
zxcv wrote:...Then name at least one which doesn't interfere with the shows. I'm not an economical specialist, but I really see the problem there. Of course they could broadcast commercials, but that would totally kill the shows. I really didn't like to have a broadcast of commercials interrupted by short scenes like on Sport 1 (former DSF) and pay TV also tends to fail in most cases. I just wanted to highlighted the fact ....that a caller who's responsible about financing a show ......but at the same time some of them might be directly responsible about bringing down the quality of the night shows .In my opinion lame shows usually are caused by lack of alternation of casts, lack of creativity of the directors (who are usually not professional) and poor craftmanship of the crew behind camera and/ or mixer. It would be a long , long , long night for all the lovers ..... when they will not be able to come in touch with their faithful friendsAnd what were my benefit? A TV night show with no calls is not a dream .....could be a commercially very successful ..........but if and only if.... ETV and the luckers..... would let this happen .Again: How should they do it? They do that erotic stuff to attract callers and SMS writers, not to make thousands of free viewers happy. Without the calls and SMS they need a completely different approach. Maybe there is one, but I don't know. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
klemi wrote:Well you see, here you are making a wrong comment...I am not one of those who watch this channel, because I want to meet some girl. I dont believe in this crap theory of love; so I am not that naive to buy presents worth my weekly pay in my decent job, which from their girls isnt. I dont watch this channel to escape from any reality, but just because ETV in past was nice channel and sometimes after a hard day at work they suceeded to relax me more then any other channel-except maybe some spectacular football game, but not when Germans are winning. But ETV really to me isnt that much as your final comment shows. What I like is a nice p...., in both lives, real and the one in front of TV with a beer or two. Sorry Klemi, If it sounded like I was focusing on you as I really was not. I was speaking in general and yes I agree with the above post as well. lol A beer and some tissue you mean, well maybe a couple of years ago when etv was good anyway. Have a good day 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am sure that 'Wilsonsand' will be eternally grateful for your intervention ...
[hidden image - please register] You never know, he may actually thank you at some point 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:basically I was hoping that this will for once and for all stop the harrassment of those making use of their private freedom to spend their money as they deem appropriate for themselves. Yeah, and I'm hoping this will stop the harrassment of those making use of their private freedom to not spend their money too. In other words, no one has to exculpate himself here for anything....either spending much money, a little or nothing at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
space6969 wrote:Dreamlander wrote:Yes,she is.Good enough to send her a message or call her to interact with her or let her know how well she is doing? Or just good enough to write it here as a means to make a 'pointless' point...for free...with no financial benefit to the lovely girl herself? Sorry 'officer',maybe next time I will revert to forum protocol and instead of asking a question I'll just make up the answer I want and present that as a fact instead. Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
|
space6969 wrote:Slowfox wrote:agree, once this goes in both directions basically I was hoping that this will for once and for all stop the harrassment of those making use of their private freedom to spend their money as they deem appropriate for themselves. |
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:agree, once this goes in both directions Sure it does. Watcher wrote:Curious response. Dreamlander's post did elicit such a response from me, because I think, just like Slowfox does, that it's none of his business how other board members interact or how much they spend. |
|
|
|
|
|
space6969 wrote:Dreamlander wrote:Yes,she is.Good enough to send her a message or call her to interact with her or let her know how well she is doing? Or just good enough to write it here as a means to make a 'pointless' point...for free...with no financial benefit to the lovely girl herself? Curious response. This forum is a public place, albeit restricted in access. Anything said or written in public is open to public scrutiny, thus any statement can be questioned or commented on by any member. So, why did Dreamlander's post elicit such a response from you? |
|
|
|
|
|
space6969 wrote:Dreamlander wrote:Yes,she is.Good enough to send her a message or call her to interact with her or let her know how well she is doing? Or just good enough to write it here as a means to make a 'pointless' point...for free...with no financial benefit to the lovely girl herself? agree, once this goes in both directions |
|
|
|
|
|
Dreamlander wrote:Yes,she is.Good enough to send her a message or call her to interact with her or let her know how well she is doing? Or just good enough to write it here as a means to make a 'pointless' point...for free...with no financial benefit to the lovely girl herself? None of your effing business how other board members interact or how much they spend. |
|
|
|
|
Well you see, here you are making a wrong comment...I am not one of those who watch this channel, because I want to meet some girl. I dont believe in this crap theory of love; so I am not that naive to buy presents worth my weekly pay in my decent job, which from their girls isnt. I dont watch this channel to escape from any reality, but just because ETV in past was nice channel and sometimes after a hard day at work they suceeded to relax me more then any other channel-except maybe some spectacular football game, but not when Germans are winning. But ETV really to me isnt that much as your final comment shows. What I like is a nice p...., in both lives, real and the one in front of TV with a beer or two.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dreamlander wrote:Wilsonsand wrote:..and Mashiara is now doing a very good EL show..thanks Mashiara!! i see...if i say it´s a bad show i am attacked, and if i say it´s a good show i must explain how and when i spend my credits... I will tell you something. I usually like to reward the good shows if my money situation allows to me, and i don´t spend a cent if the model is not willing to fulfill requests, fool the customers, or the show bores to me. Being nice i will answer you: good enough for write here about her good show and good enough to send her a message to make her know about it, Mashiara is one of the models whose work i appreciate the most. But, with all due respects, me, and neither any member, has to explain, when, how, or why spend his credits, sorry.The only asking seems to me disrespecful, even more in your tone. p.s.: sorry but your ·"pointless" point seems to me unfortunate. Its so "pointless" as the birthdays congratulations or love letters written here.. and many other things. This forum is free.. we all can "make pointless points", right? Or can i only write here if i am spending money in what i am talking about and also i need to explain it? (please don´t answer and make this thing longer) p.s.2: sorry forum, i don´t like off-topics. |
|
|
|
klemi wrote:For some people here it is still ok if Karry or any other model just lies down there talking with some guy for an hour doing nothing...That kind of shit does not belong to a channel as is ETV performing a service that is visible to many other members who have some wishes, normal erotic wishes as is normal for erotic hmm...exclusive live shows. And these are women that do anything they say to them in that studio. Lately there were so many great shows, premium shows, while nightshows are improving very slowly, with models who are in there far too long. Karry, Evah, Brona, Ju furfill wishes only by phone, by just talking to people...Well, that certainly isnt erotic service what ELS should be and is, what many girls have proven lately. I dont care if you HVB or anyone else spends hours and hours on phone with any model, fully dressed, but not when this girl is on any kind of web erotic show. If so, it should be written as for example nonude phone line for fans or something, but not as tv show... Like they do it now, other people who send messages for erotic show or sexy dancing and teasing, dont get any of it. And they also pay for it. We can agree that SMS for TV shows are very very expensive. And after what Karry did in her triple show on a premium with Mashi, especially second part, is simply all that stuff unacceptable. And I sincerely hope that this will not destroy web shows as did destroy many nightshows in recent years. I am afraid that shows that we can enjoy now from Tara, Jeit or Mimi or Aida on web will not last. Because of people who dont want to see girls naked but just hear their voice...On that day I kick myself out as a member of ETV. Good night to all of you. Everyone is different mate, it is clear here that each individual has their own thing for a model and is willing to pay to communicate with her. Personally I cannot understand why ? I think a lot of the older pretty models have gone very sly. And as such I contribute nothing to etv. I also know etv is a free to air channel and what you see is what you get, and we all now how bad that is so... So if complainers do not watch there is nothing to complain about, if complainers do not fuel the web activity with money there is nothing to complain about, it really is that simple. It is a beautiful day, get a life and meet someone for real !!!!! |
|
|
|
