Author | Posts |
---|---|
Hallo Outside
I red Your post and abt your theory i wrote the same months ago (I didn't anyway say to stop buying credits) and I was accused of cospiracy. For my opinion if it's right is a wrong theory cause one of the most earn of money are the sms as a normal chat , in white and in German language, on Astra and in Arab language on Hotbird Regards Voncall |
|
|
|
timfrance wrote:Excuse me... I'm hearing that a model decided to leave the show - who is she ? Maybe Michelle? Let's see at midday. Kia has replaced just Michelle yesterday at webshows. Glassy is right when he states nighshows are just warmed dayshows, but it's not because of censorship, it's because they are tuning nightshows softer and softer to sell webshows. So the answer is stop buying credits. |
|
|
|
Does anybody really care anymore ?? My moneys on Kia. The nightshows now are just warmed up dayshows so any one of the regular night models could leave anytime through sheer boredom. No wonder Sabrina left (again)
|
|
|
|
Excuse me... I'm hearing that a model decided to leave the show - who is she ?
|
|
|
|
What ETV and all the viewers need as from now in the nightshow are more hot/hot models and only one per evening soft/hot model. In the dayshows they need soft models and soft/soft models. That is one of the ways ETV can survive. One other way is go back to the country where they started. Get out of Moldavia or how is that country named. Less or even no censorship at all in the old country.
|
|
|
|
I think, ETV has a financial default.
As long as it is not fell short, nothing at all will change. Why also? Then own censorship is loosened again, and then we will also see more hotter models. Hopefully soon! |
|
|
|
new contest? great!
But I'm more interested in the yearly trip To Molvania City and the visit at the studio.. This year should take place during a Premium show...? Are the bookings already open? how many credits? ...what a wonderfull world... |
|
|
|
bellerophon wrote:outside wrote:Did I read correct? A "round II" for ETV Best model 2012 for saturday 19th night? This is undoubtedly another symptom of almost total lack of ideas from which ETV is afflicted. They only want money but do nothing to earn it. They selected a small group of customers willing to finance them, but at the same time, have lost most of their customers. The truth is that if ETV was born yesterday (that is, if it could not count on the affection of a few diehards), today would have been closed. They live of their past, and it's a good thing, because their present is infinitely sad. Regards |
|
|
|
outside wrote:Did I read correct? A "round II" for ETV Best model 2012 for saturday 19th night? I would also suggest A parallel competition for the worst at all in 2012 .......From now I will bet for who would overwhelmingly win the prize . I also bet that it would be even more profitable than the other prize for the best one . But just a question ....Do they really realize to what level they have reached ??????? Pathetic...... |
|
|
|
Did I read correct? A "round II" for ETV Best model 2012 for saturday 19th night?
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately they retreat to the back and lose Almahidin are very love of money where we find models be completely naked in exclusive offers either in the free offer is found not only appeared something simple can be seen in any movie or normal program they love money and lose the public
|
|
|
|
What then that was yesterday night again for a show.
Models were absolutely listless everything. Except nothing at all is a matter probably calling up at this transmitter mehr.ich has thought, we are surprised in 2013 positively. But no. Everything goes in the same step downhill. |
|
|
|
Angelika wrote:ouch (hug) love you anyway. ;) |
|
|
|
Tarl_Cabot wrote:Angelika wrote:well I assume that if they share their email, fb, private adress and even the skype of their mother with you they think pretty good about you ouch |
|
|
|
Watcher wrote:Chris26 wrote:As far as I know, yes, they do get trained to deal with callers, and they might treat different callers in a different way (something which, I guess, stems from the first point... you don't speak with a 60-year old pervert the same way you'd speak with a 30-year-old guy who just wants to exchange a few words). As far as your last question, I think that, as you guess, it is nearly impossible to get a honest answer. Yes, I wasn't necessarily linking age with perversion. I could've written "30-year-old pervert" and "60-year-old guy" and it would've worked anyway. Well, from one, I guess that you can sort of tell if you're speaking with a youngster or with a person in retirement. But of course there is a middle ground where age is definitely not one of the thing callers utter on the phone. |
|
|