Eurotic TV - General Discussion

malmaisons wrote:This RTR topic is a bit out of date - 3 years passed and ETV is still around.
But as a matter of fact the 'Ressel family' panicked when they received that document ... and after this incident they invented Brona-Evah as the new prototype of ETV models

Evah and Brona are there for more than 4 years, so it was a bit late for inventing them ...

This RTR topic is a bit out of date - 3 years passed and ETV is still around.
But as a matter of fact the 'Ressel family' panicked when they received that document ... and after this incident they invented Brona-Evah as the new prototype of ETV models

Good evening
RTR!!
It is possible to have an English translation?
A reply will be very aprreciated
Regards
Voncall

vappiano68 wrote:Tomorrow you will have the details.

PLZ remember the old Shakespeare quote
"Brevity is the soul of wit"

HvB wrote:

vappiano68 wrote:These "external censors" have been used too much as an excuse for "internal purposes".
EU laws, molvanian laws, RTR laws have have been used to confuse people who don't read and who don't watch what happens out of ETV' studio.
Things are very different.

ok, what is more real than [hidden link - please register] ?
And what happens out of the etv studio?
Please give some details.

Tomorrow you will have the details.

vappiano68 wrote:These "external censors" have been used too much as an excuse for "internal purposes".
EU laws, molvanian laws, RTR laws have have been used to confuse people who don't read and who don't watch what happens out of ETV' studio.
Things are very different.

ok, what is more real than [hidden link - please register] ?
And what happens out of the etv studio?
Please give some details.

outside wrote:Nice joke, really, it would be a nice joke.
Pity I suspect you are not joking, since I suspect you are from ETV, you are just lying consciously.
Sad to see there is still people who buy censorship issue. More sad is there is still people who use this excuse to self-justify their incompetence.
Come on, they couldn't produce on web different stuff because it's prohibited by molvanian law.

So they (talking to Carl, I would say you) tuned down TV shows to make webshows look "special", something that worths credits.
So at least don't fool people, dear Ilja Carl, I haven't any ring at my nose.

Have a nice Sunday.

Don't talk the talk if you can't walk the walk!

Carl wrote:By the way I think the WEB project is the best idea in months, and furthermore the only opportunity they have to keep offering Shows that are absolutely impossible at FTA, and that will be worse in Future due to strict rules that will be implemented in EU for FTA programs.
Maybe some people who complains should put the blame in the right place which are on this "Censors" who are so concern about our "Morality" but they do keep struggling people with their economical decisions based on ruling what to do and what not to do, and restricting freedom, but of course increasing the people charges to support their "Happy Life".

Please, don't consider my words as a an attack.
I agree just about one point: the web could be a good idea to bypass daily strict rules.
I thought this about 3 years and half ago (as I wrote here during 2009) and I think today.
But the way this idea has been implemented is the worst thing in ETV history.
As regards the remaining part of your post I don't buy a single word.
These "external censors" have been used too much as an excuse for "internal purposes".
EU laws, molvanian laws, RTR laws have have been used to confuse people who don't read and who don't watch what happens out of ETV' studio.
Things are very different.

Tarl_Cabot wrote:

outside wrote:another strange & unproven theory

no need to show a reaction to the posted accuse to another forum member which (of course) cannot be proved in any way (I don't wanna use outside's favourite words ridiculous & hypocritical). as a former Mod outside should know a few about forum members which means things like IP and so the countries or proxies. so feel free to discuss about censorship or not (facts are more welcome than strange theories) but leave the personal shit side.

btw: Carl is longer a forum member than outside, so he must be right. ;)

Thank you for your comment.
As you said I am old member in this Forum,
I did some critics when I think are reasonable, but also I do recognize when something was done in right way.

Carl wrote:Anybody could have a Problem, but what matters is the attitude to face it, and I guess the way ETV reaction in this case is from far more than reasonable, and Professional.
First they assume the mistake and second they compensate for that.
What else can you ask for...

I don't disagree …..the reaction from ETV side was quite reasonable….It's good that they finally wake up and trying to fix their most prominent problem ....The credibility …

But on the other hand ….It's quite understandable ….that the rules of the game must be changed ....And If ETV wants the new project to work by any means ....They " must " show some respect for the paying customers .....and change its old tricky games ....at least in the beginning of the journey .

Carl wrote:By the way I think the WEB project is the best idea in months

I also don't disagree … Without doubt it was the best .

The best example …of how a successful and stable company could start and launch ...the worst investment approach... which eventually will destroy ....its core business and its main assists , its main source of income ....and forces its huge base of fans to be pissed off with it

The best idea ever of how to be unable ....to determine where are your real market ....or even to offer an innovative marking approach which draw the attention of your huge base of fans and gives them a chance to get involved .

The idea was so inspiring....No question

Carl wrote:Maybe some people who complains should put the blame in the right place which are on this "Censors" who are so concern about our "Morality" but they do keep struggling people with their economical decisions based on ruling what to do and what not to do, and restricting freedom, but of course increasing the people charges to support their "Happy Life".

Back again to the controversial issue of censorship ...which bring us to a dispute...

For sure I don't agree .....And I am justified in this regard ....And for this I wonder ...

Since when ETV claims that the rules on the web shows were/are/will be quite different from those which being applied on the TV shows .

outside wrote:another strange & unproven theory

no need to show a reaction to the posted accuse to another forum member which (of course) cannot be proved in any way (I don't wanna use outside's favourite words ridiculous & hypocritical). as a former Mod outside should know a few about forum members which means things like IP and so the countries or proxies. so feel free to discuss about censorship or not (facts are more welcome than strange theories) but leave the personal shit side.

btw: Carl is longer a forum member than outside, so he must be right. ;)

Nice joke, really, it would be a nice joke.
Pity I suspect you are not joking, since I suspect you are from ETV, you are just lying consciously.
Sad to see there is still people who buy censorship issue. More sad is there is still people who use this excuse to self-justify their incompetence.
Come on, they couldn't produce on web different stuff because it's prohibited by molvanian law.

So they (talking to Carl, I would say you) tuned down TV shows to make webshows look "special", something that worths credits.
So at least don't fool people, dear Ilja Carl, I haven't any ring at my nose.

Have a nice Sunday.

lucifer70 wrote:ETV says:

"A technical problem appeared during the Late Premium Show /Friday Baroque Show/

A lot of viewers seem to have done multiple attempts to enter the show and had been charged each time but they did not get access to the show. The technical team investigates the issue and will provide details soon. All credits will be refunded to each charged viewers account. We are sorry for the inconveniency."

But they still did not understand that this site is a failure?

They are really stubborn!

Anybody could have a Problem, but what matters is the attitude to face it, and I guess the way ETV reaction in this case is from far more than reasonable, and Professional.
First they assume the mistake and second they compensate for that.
What else can you ask for...

By the way I think the WEB project is the best idea in months, and furthermore the only opportunity they have to keep offering Shows that are absolutely impossible at FTA, and that will be worse in Future due to strict rules that will be implemented in EU for FTA programs.
Maybe some people who complains should put the blame in the right place which are on this "Censors" who are so concern about our "Morality" but they do keep struggling people with their economical decisions based on ruling what to do and what not to do, and restricting freedom, but of course increasing the people charges to support their "Happy Life".

lucifer70 wrote:ETV says:

"A lot of viewers seem to have done multiple attempts to enter the show and had been charged each time but they did not get access to the show. The technical team investigates the issue and will provide details soon. All credits will be refunded to each charged viewers account. We are sorry for the inconveniency."

Slowfox wrote:the latest on the wall related to this issue..

'The last Night's Premium Show problem turned out to be caused by... too long title on the live show page.
The title had to be: Baroque, Realism, Romanticism - Kristina, Claudia, Milla, in Premium Hour. It is more than 46 symbols and it caused misunderstanding between the streaming system and the accounts charging module. The problem is fixed.
slow

Which means that every viewer who tried to watch, could not.

lucifer70 wrote:And what does that mean?
The web is and remains a failure. Even if they refund customers remains the reality, web is too expensive and they're not able to make it works.That's all.

I wonder how they'll still be able to carry on this bandwagon.

Regards

and who says that ? and where is the proof for that ?

you may be right, but in the same way you may be wrong

in all fairness

slow