Eurotic TV - General Discussion

TimMcGee wrote:It's not at all about "money or no money". It's about what ETV offers customers for their money.

It's a simple business rule. Don't mess with the customer! If a customer doesn't get value for his money, he'll be gone.

If you go to a restaurant and they offer you bad food, the waiter insults you and you have to pay 10€ for a glass of water, would you ever go there again? I don't think so. If this restaurant improves quality again, and you're told about it, you might come back.

Same with ETV: they just take our money (in general, not mine ) and offer a poor service. If ppl complain, they blame the customer. The quality contantly decreases. So, they don't deserve any money right now.

If they change attitude and offer a really good service and respect their customers, there might even be more cutomers and they are more than ready to pay.

yes for this point but there are people happy for the shows and they are paying
maybe when etv will see that this is the wrong way will change own show or maybe continues in this way
one thing again....are we sure (and in the exclusive show since is a pay show i don't think there is the censor) models can offer us shows like others channels?

It says it all about etv at the moment.
Absolutely no comments overnight and a while since a comment made here

It's a sad moment. Bad shows, unerotic models in the night shows.
It's boring.. I'm tired and i'm not interested to see and to call.
Hope new models became hot or old beautiful will come back..

Have they lowered the quality of broadcast yet again ? last night i am getting pixelation on even the slightest movement of the models yet my signal strength is very high.
Does this poor quality save them money - it can't be much can it ?

so if the show is subject to censorship, but not as strict as they would have us believe, then discussion of it is worthwhile - not futile.

Censorship exists, unfortunately, but it's not as strict as them would have us believe.
However, I don't think that censorship imposes:
- change the shot every 20 seconds
- totally ignore some models in the studio
- ignore requests (reasonable) of customers
- systematically interrupting the performance of the models
- not managing the show with a minimum of fantasy
and, it stays between us, I don't think there is a specific legal provision for the breast of Gia

Well . . . I don't know if the censor is responsible.
The censor must be an oppressive weight on the shoulders of the producers. After all, censorship is a tool of oppression.
Camera operators must be very nervous about where they point camera IF trouble from censor / authority will follow a naughty mistake.
Having said that a certain model is taking some risks lately....
Its certainly a lot different just now on the night shows from the time just after the trouble when all models stood around fully clothed doing nothing. What a dreadful time that was.

Hello you.
@ Siegfried - you said ... << makes me sad that the discussion on censorship is thought to be futile >>
I agree with you ... but, to say ... the cencure is responsible ...... avoid seeing reality .... to talk about something that angry ...
dafr911.

fcn2011 wrote:Who is John Thompson and what is Bukkake, he, he

Are you kidding?

You don´t know GGG? He make millions with Amateur porn where a lots of "Normal" People cum over one or two Models..... Or they drink it like Milk.....

I hope you have had lunch....[/quote]

Yes I know, was wondering how you were going to explain them, hence the laugh at the end.

Thank you very much for the answers and explanations.
It does make me sad that discussion of censorship is thought to be futile but its probably true.
There are so many different views in this thread that its impossible to sense or distill what is the consensus.

Siegfried wrote:@ zxcv - you said .....everybody is satisfied with the limits of the rules as long as there are some real efforts in the part of creativity.
I'm not satisfied with the limits.

I think its very poor for almost all the girls to get naked just after 12 CET and then stand around with their legs clamped together or stick their bums out backwards to make the sacred object disappear and risk falling over.

SO , what exactly are you expecting to see ....there won't be anymore an open legs or even some hot kissing .....That's the rules of the game ....So whether you live with it ....or to leave it completely

For this I said that to continue to discuss the issue of censorship and its bad impact on the shows from our side and also from their side is just a complete nonsense ...Because it's up to everybody to continue within these limits or not .

At the end of the day it's been proven that the problem is certainly not lies in the strict rules of the censorship.

Siegfried wrote:What did you mean by 'lame' show. Too soft, or not enough acting out of ideas ?

I meant instead of discussion the senseless issue of censorship ....For me it's not an issue to be discussed anymore .

It's better to think about ......how to benefit from the other " remaining area " beyond these strict rules of censorship throung enhancing the quality of the shows and put some creativity within.

The real creative shows ....the passionate symbolic interactions between models ....The high quality works .....would for sure compensate the other physical side which has been prohibited by the censorship rules .

Hello you.
Person on demand porn etv! not me! not fans of etv I supose?
But not with shows of nights:
-models of vantouses, slumped in a chair.
-models with the bad head four times in five.
-or that insults the customers.
But the shows, animation, joy, smiling faces, (Scarlet, Roshana, Nancy, Mashiara, Angelina, Kristina .... etc.)
Regulation of 2008 has lost money the company has.
The solution website?? Certainemant not!
The problem, recruiting models, no money, no models for the show.
A dozen models for the shows at night and the web and insufficient.
dafr911.

@ zxcv - you said .....everybody is satisfied with the limits of the rules as long as there are some real efforts in the part of creativity.
I'm not satisfied with the limits.

I think its very poor for almost all the girls to get naked just after 12 CET and then stand around with their legs clamped together or stick their bums out backwards to make the sacred object disappear and risk falling over.

What did you mean by 'lame' show. Too soft, or not enough acting out of ideas ?

lucifer70 wrote:You're right, but, maybe, many who have opened an account on ETV to think differently...ask the models!

It wouldn't be pretty hard for everyone ( No matter his level of intelligence , education , culture ) to figure out ...what the regime is all about .....and therefore to decide , whether to continue to follow that or not .

But probably , the longstanding discussion around the timeless issue of censorship turned into a complete nonsense ....

Eventually what is very clear is that ....the censorship rules and laws are not to be blamed for the bad services from ETV side .

zxcv wrote:Just a question :

Let's suppose that there is no problem with the laws and the censorship rules and all of these stuff ( like Kissing and other porn staff ) is allowed to be shown in the their TV shows .....or even only on their new line production the ELS .

Would ETV go that way and destroy the image of their next door girls by going that way ....????????

Even the " usual cut " for the scenes in the TV shows was part of the charm of ETV .....

The discussion about the rules makes no sense for me .....because nobody watch ETV is looking for some porn staff .....everybody is satisfied with the limits of the rules as long as there are some real efforts in the part of creativity .

But as a matter of fact ....the laws and the strict rules of censorship has become ..." the unjustified reason " ...for not offering a real good service from ETV side .

You're right, but, maybe, many who have opened an account on ETV to think differently...ask the models!