| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
Dreamlander wrote:Seven girls missing from tonight's line-up so far! Bailey and Cyprus onscreen plus Reede earlier,who wasn't listed for tonight.Something is wrong,I can't believe the other seven will appear at midnight.I'm only hoping that Honey turns up though! Thats why i don't put the schedules on homepage as it would be a waste of time, as i would be spending most nights changing them. the schedules they put up seem to be at least a week before the show is on, and as we have seen some girls have left but still supposed to be on that night. |
|
|
|
|
|
Seven girls missing from tonight's line-up so far! Bailey and Cyprus onscreen plus Reede earlier,who wasn't listed for tonight.Something is wrong,I can't believe the other seven will appear at midnight.I'm only hoping that Honey turns up though!
Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose it could work djpron, as TVX started where they did G/G with toys and you never saw anything, due to UK laws, and only a very few girls would do that, so a few of us asked for less contact and more open leg shots for the camera, which they very kindly did
 and more of the girls who don't do porn started to do the show  So always worth a try, seeing lori properly with legs spread for the camera would be nice to see
|
|
|
|
|
|
I posted my idea for NudeBlue on the babeshows website. Heres the link, tell me if you guys think its a good idea. I hope it takes this route as there are lots of their babes that wont want to do explicit but the viewers will want harder content. By making 10-12am only fully nude will stop any ambiguity between explicit and nude.
[hidden link - please register] |
|
|
|
|
Is it that bad that the girls have to appear in disguise.
"No honestly, I was never on that channel, really, no really, must have been my twin sister..." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
HEXiT wrote:well heres a turn up for the books, i have something pasative to say... Yes she just had a nice pussy slip as well mate, and i think it Cyprus Isles with a long blonde wig on. |
|
|
|
|
|
Just been checking to see if there is any new info on "Nudeblue" and the last bit of info BB posted was on 16/09 and then it seemed more of a could be in the next month answer.
So not much point talking about it, and building it up on here until they have more credible answers than that in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
i totally agree with u m8, when are we gona folow the other european countrys? for example when the french had an increace of one sent in the price of milk the whole country boicoted the product the day after and forced the party responcible for the increce to retract it, this is just a littel example in maybe hundreds out there, our freedom should be total and HEXIT! where do u get all this from m8? i love it man, tanks for the info.
we should expect a good rules shake up anytime soon now there is a secound party trying to get a peice of the cake. nailpouchofmine wrote:I have read and condensed the whole proposals and recomendations that the aforesaid ofcom have sugested and in no way do I accept that the phony proposals about 12 midnight should should become mandatory.These people are a law unto thereselves and it should in fact be a crime against our freedom of television without frontiers for these people to keep on making rules which are not and never will be lawful.We are a people that have a government whom promote laws for this land and as such these people should put there proposals on such things to be talked about at government level[ie in parliament] When are we the public going to be listened to,are we not old enough to make our minds up about what we watch,why should we be told that we are not allowed to see bare breasts on tv when we can see them on any beach,why are we told that we must not be able to see any explicit material on tv when we want,because children may be able to see it,All of my children have grown up and fled the nest but I still get this pressure from ofcom,the watershed used to be 9.00 now its gone to 9.30 ,what next 01.00-02.00 what a load of crap,lets all think about this in retrospect,if we allow these people to keep on changing the regulations without going through the proper channels[parliament]where is it going to stop |
|
|
|
|
I have read and condensed the whole proposals and recomendations that the aforesaid ofcom have sugested and in no way do I accept that the phony proposals about 12 midnight should should become mandatory.These people are a law unto thereselves and it should in fact be a crime against our freedom of television without frontiers for these people to keep on making rules which are not and never will be lawful.We are a people that have a government whom promote laws for this land and as such these people should put there proposals on such things to be talked about at government level[ie in parliament] When are we the public going to be listened to,are we not old enough to make our minds up about what we watch,why should we be told that we are not allowed to see bare breasts on tv when we can see them on any beach,why are we told that we must not be able to see any explicit material on tv when we want,because children may be able to see it,All of my children have grown up and fled the nest but I still get this pressure from ofcom,the watershed used to be 9.00 now its gone to 9.30 ,what next 01.00-02.00 what a load of crap,lets all think about this in retrospect,if we allow these people to keep on changing the regulations without going through the proper channels[parliament]where is it going to stop
|
|
|
|
|
|
so one says full frontal nudity is allowed while the other says it isnt ? no wonder the shows are so inconsistant now none of them know what the rules are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
i thought the babe channels were under the advertising code now and no longer ruled by ofcom ?
|
|
|
|
|
DJPron wrote:Yeh that is true, they were saying maybe 2 bluebucks for 1 night or 30 bluebucks for subscription. That would be a good price, cheaper than BSX, obviously would be some penetration because its a webstream. Imagine nudeblue special nights for 5 bucks, Amanda + Bailey etc. Would be too good to miss, will also depend on which girls want to do it. But Amanda + Bailey? Bailey and Amanda aren't my cup of tea, too rough round the edges, besides we have seen it all with them already. Now Lori would be good... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeh that is true, they were saying maybe 2 bluebucks for 1 night or 30 bluebucks for subscription. That would be a good price, cheaper than BSX, obviously would be some penetration because its a webstream. Imagine nudeblue special nights for 5 bucks, Amanda + Bailey etc. Would be too good to miss, will also depend on which girls want to do it. But Amanda + Bailey?
I can see that happening
|
|
|
|
|
|
A lot will depend on how much they decide to charge as to whether it will be a success
|
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely cant wait for the NudeBlue stream to get up and running, its going to be a little expensive but Im sure it will be worth the bucks. They did a little test on the webstream when BBTV was off the sky channels for a bit. Heres some pics of Cindy doing a lot more than anything else, TVX live will have nothing on this. ATM they wont be on sky because its too tame, but webstream will be up after payment. They suggested it will be up maybe next month, they have 3-4 webstream channels not filled up so expect better streams for harder content in the future.
[hidden link - please register][hidden link - please register][hidden link - please register] [hidden link - please register][hidden link - please register][hidden link - please register] |
|
|
