| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
As of today there's a brand new reputation feature available on the site, which means that members can rate other members. You can access the feature from each users' profile page. The current reputation of members is also being displayed on the left of each forum post. Only members with at least 10 posts or a reputation of at least +1 can rate other members.
Remember to stay fair and honest! Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
I took note, but I will not Like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) to Mr. ilian. It is nice of you to take part for Mr. slava, but this is not your business
b) to Mr. slava, thanks for a cheap return I will not discuss the rep given. the system is made this way and I made use of that, or do you ask me seriously to continue to ignore rather then dislike what I dislike ? But I understand that such a great video maker as you cannot believe receiving a negative rep as you never spent any second thought on what you are actually doing and what harm you have already done. For all this you earned my disrespect and that is reflected in the rep. Go figure. But don't worry my friend. It can well be that rather soon am not around anymore and then you can happily live ever after. |
|
|
|
|
For Slowfox:
New Feature: Member Reputation .. . ... ... Remember to stay fair and honest! Thank you. -------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
slava64 wrote:slava64 wrote:On my video is clearly seen that behind Kristina stands Monique and plays in Kristina`s tits. [hidden link - please register] @Slowfox Today again (the fifth time) ... I'm asked to you stop and not to play with a reputation! You do not want. Well good ... I warned you, so that now do not be offended. |
|
|
|
|
|
slava64 wrote:On my video is clearly seen that behind Kristina stands Monique and plays in Kristina`s tits. Slowfox wrote:well, frankly, from your usual caps it is many times not clear who is who, as, for one or the other reason, you seem to be focussed on the lower half of the girls. slava64 wrote:You again want to get the 49? Slowfox wrote:This is now really new to me. Using the rep system to threaten and thus it comlpetely looses its purpose. You don't threatening, you do it repeatedly (last time today). Perhaps therefore reputation system completely loses its purpose because you already the fourth time change your mind and remove your reputation from my account? You don't need to fuss and worry longer to increase or decrease the number of my reputation. I'm so know very well, without your additional efforts, what your opinion about me is negative. Just stop! Request to moderators delete my post, please, but I was must write it's, to all became clear and close the this issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:This is now really new to me. Using the rep system to threaten Of course moods flare or is that flair (I never looked that up  ) anyway, what can be said of these 2 great adult contributors of LSTV  You both know the right thing to do, don't you ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is now really new to me. Using the rep system to threaten
slava64 wrote:Slowfox wrote:slava64 wrote:On my video is clearly seen that behind Kristina stands Monique and plays in Kristina`s tits. ... and thus it comlpetely looses its purpose. |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Vappiano68, I see he took 10 years from you
 In answer to this theory of being negatively repped by countless non active members. It won't or should not happen! Reason for this is that we implemented a kind of default rep option for new or older members with no or little contribution. Reasons why it would be rare. 1. New members or old have no chance of giving reps until they reach 10+ posts. 2. The only way to have rep option with less than 10+ posts is to be repped by another member. Once repped this opens up their reputation option. Sadly it does seem that the member in question as made a mistake but, just look at the one negative as a badge of honour as you did not negative rep the member back or upload another members content to chase the rep. The rep system does work but like everything, there are flaws in its use
|
|
|
|
|
|
I knew that someday I should have written something like this.
That day has come, and I hope this can be useful for some members to think about . Many "old" members already know my opinion about the "reputation feature" and the reasons for which I've never used it, even if several members would deserve a positive feedback. For those ones who don't know, they can find some explanations here: [hidden link - please register] Today I have the proof that my assumption was not so crazy. In my personal page I've found this: [hidden link - please register] [hidden link - please register] In few words: 1) 18.02.2015, 14:05 C.E.T.: "Flugstier" sent me a pm with a request: 2) In his request he even made a mistake in my nick (vappiano78)  .3) His request was totally wrong, because he asked me for a repost of 7 videos. But these videos have been originally posted by "genya" (not by vappiano) .4) 21.02.2015. 08:30 C.E.T: Less than 72 hours since his request, I have a "negative reputation" from Flugstier You should say: "Vappiano, you don't care about reputations, you don't use this feature, what do you care about this negative reputation?" My answer is simple: I don't care less about it  , but I'd like you think about this. [hidden link - please register] As you can see, "Flugstier" joined this forum more than 3 years ago. 3 years in the forum --- 3 posts in the forum, each one containing only requests. Exceptional contribution to the forum !Let's imagine 1000 members, who use this forum only for pms' requests. Let's imagine 1000 requests you can't fulfill. 1000 negative reputations for this ?If this is what you can obtain from this feature, then I'm happy to have never used it. 2 further words: I apologize to all the members who sent me pms for some vids reposts. Guys, something in my life has changed, now I have no time to fulfill them or to give answers to everyone like I did in the past. Please, accept my apology for this and... ... feel free to gimme 1000s "negative reputations" for this .But please, don't use the word "condescendingly!", like Flugstier did. It's a word which doesn't fit to me. Best regards. Vapp |
|
|
|
|
|
outside wrote:Apart from your insults, those caps won't proove much. of course we add extra functions to the BO just to remove given Reps in the frontend. the BO looks still the same as you remember (or not) it but if you want I could post also a cap of your profile in the BO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apart from your insults, those caps won't proove much.
What about "back office"? |
|
|
|
|
|
outside wrote:I have told this since the beginning, when I still was a moderator, reputation system is a dangerous game, a double-edged sword, I never agreed about that. seriously, don't you realise it any more when you are writing nonsens, or? you remember that you've been a Mod when the Rep system was introduced but you cannot remember how the site looks? and as you don't remember you call others liars? maybe it's for you and your life on your own small planet far away from reality nowadays so normal to waste your time with lies that you cannot imagine any longer others to act in a different way but to refresh your memory see the cap below. no chance to edit any Rep. to show you something different a cap of the Avatar remove button, too. [hidden link - please register] [hidden link - please register] PS: no need to answer. as you weren't able to accept robert and the fact that some aren't interested in cyberstalking a few weeks ago I doubt that you'll accept that some aren't constantly lying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:I recently notice that the rep system develops to kind of work around of the forum rules, being used or abused for some personal offense I have told this since the beginning, when I still was a moderator, reputation system is a dangerous game, a double-edged sword, I never agreed about that. It is quite strange that this site has some strict rules about insults vs fellow members, but it has also a grey zone where all is allowed. A mod told me they couldn't even edit the reputation (I doubt about that). In your case, it was you at offending me first, naming me "short minded", so what did you expect from me? Should I thank you? Since you have removed yours, I have removed mine about you. I have no reason to keep that. |
|
|
|
|
|
nobody insults me but i'm back to 105
|
|
|
