| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
I recently notice that the rep system develops to kind of work around of the forum rules, being used or abused for some personal offense
 Slow |
|
|
|
|
|
I don't waste my time at reading others reputation, so I took mine as example.
I just expressed my opinion. Anyway I could confirm many things too. |
|
|
|
|
|
outside wrote:I think it's time to think about quitting this useless feature. if you think that something should be removed because you think it's senseless for you so I'll have to comfirm that your last gotten Rep is a Bulls Eye. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's time to think about quitting this useless feature.
I was rated positive from some people I despise (a lot) and I was rated negative from some people who I don't either know (maybe they thought attacking me would be cool and would make them more popular, or maybe they were looking for 15 mins of celebrity Andy Wahrol spoke about). So this feature is senseless to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
davecool31 wrote:New, eh.......The Uk Babe Channels has had this function since day1. Interesting you should mention new feature because the one we are no longer allowed to do is give out neg reps anymore. BTW - I am known as Scottishbloke on the other forum. Feel free to PM me on the other forum and I'll be happy to confirm this to you. Just been away from this forum for the last few years. I will hopefully get my user name changed soon - new to this forum. one of the few and occasional new things & adds in this forum during the years - [hidden link - please register] is the man you're asking for ;) - welcome back 
|
|
|
|
|
|
New, eh.......The Uk Babe Channels has had this function since day1. Interesting you should mention new feature because the one we are no longer allowed to do is give out neg reps anymore. BTW - I am known as Scottishbloke on the other forum. Feel free to PM me on the other forum and I'll be happy to confirm this to you. Just been away from this forum for the last few years. I will hopefully get my user name changed soon
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I read as well some of the other posters, so I decided to elect from my side (if I have already the right, Mauro. My best regards and wishes of full success to Administrator/s.
Jwaga |
|
|
|
|
|
|
i know who is the problem
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the end you have to trust in the rationality of the forum members and accept it's not perfect.
Every rating system can be fooled and no rating system is objective. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
|
|
Replacing with the thanks/like button would take away the right to choose and can also be manipulated just as easy as you see the reps being.
The next step then is to give reps for thanks/likes given instead and again manipulated. Forcing people into thanking/liking would only mean a new way of finding ways it suites them, i'm all in favour of a fair system but the thanks/likes only favours those who post in ETV and would cancel out anyone who posts anything other. But i did do a quick check on thanks/likes given to videomakers and have noticed there reps count show there would be no or little change in there reps. In short the more you post the more reps you get, which encourages spamming as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
vogue wrote:Slowfox wrote:As it is already technically possible to count the like button hits, why not use this as the base. say each 50 or 100 overall likes/thanks received gives the poster of messages one point in rep. further we saw in the past, deleted again for some controversal reasons, the dislike button, which could cater for the opposite, i.e. deduction. as Admin made and keeps this place it would be more than fair if he gets most Reps. ;) the reality is visible only 1 post above. |
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:As it is already technically possible to count the like button hits, why not use this as the base. say each 50 or 100 overall likes/thanks received gives the poster of messages one point in rep. further we saw in the past, deleted again for some controversal reasons, the dislike button, which could cater for the opposite, i.e. deduction. Thereby the videomakers would have the most reputation amongst members, as they deserved. I think it's quite fair, at least for them. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dear fellow forum members, dear friends,
well, once in a while this is brought back to the table for discussion. The oh so famous rep system and its pro's and con's. As a sign of appreciation for some valuable contibution there is nothing to say against that, and for such cases it has my full support. However, I noticed - or is it only my observation? - that this well meant system is more and more abused as a one for one, just to boost own reputation, and thus it looses objectivity and downgrades reps given for some real work and valuable contribution. So here is my proposal, for some more objective measuring, for your consideration or discussion. As it is already technically possible to count the like button hits, why not use this as the base. say each 50 or 100 overall likes/thanks received gives the poster of messages one point in rep. further we saw in the past, deleted again for some controversal reasons, the dislike button, which could cater for the opposite, i.e. deduction. Clear this is still not the most objective, as we will further see some lobbying, regardless of message contents, but this can be outweighed by the dislike button. It certainly needs to be determined how many likes/dislikes are worth one rep. Too high a value may lead to zero reps all over the forum. Maybe each 25 instead of 50 or 100 can do the trick. Happy objectivity slow |
|
|
|
|
|
i know that i already said but i saw in another forum that in the reputation sistem there are smiles and i wonder why here no?
only a little suggest 
|
|
|
|
|
|
I now this is off topic but i don't now where i can post it !
I have a idea for a new marker for the members ID Status: Offline Mitglied seit: 21.03.2009 Posts: 20 Video uploads: here can stand the number of all uploads they have post ! Reputation: 0 Hat sich bisher 1 Mal bedankt i think this a good information of the activity in this forum ! |
|
|
