Occupation dates for models?

Sorry if this is not the correct thread - mod may relocate if necessary.
We have here lists of the active and also the former models of ETV. I think it is appropriate to express my thank for this in this place. May I ask if it would be possible - with the collected knowledge of all posters here - to add the dates (month/year would be sufficient) when the model first appeared in the shows and, for the former ones, when she left. Doable or not, what do you think?

preferred sex position

I remember in old ETV site there was stated, pity I just remember Dorian's favorite one was "reversed cowgirl". :))))))

Anyone remembers some other?

@Erik:
well, after generating about 37 postings in this thread, I'm not sure if I really have to excuse me.
But let me add a few thoughts.
What purpose? Imagine someone compiles a list of all presidents of the U.S. I am sure he would add the dates when they had been president, or could you tell the dates for Eisenhower or Wilson?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not comparing the ETV girls with the U.S. presidents!!

Occupation. I'm sorry my English is not so fluent, but Leo gives the meaning 'Beschäftigung' for this word, and that's what I meant. Maybe you think employment would have been better - yes, could be. That a word can have different meanings is not my fault.

Personal data: If you would scan an archive of all ETV shows (starting 2007 would be sufficient), you could extract the following (possibly incomplete) list of 'personal data' for some models:
- age and birthday
- real name
- height
- breast circumference
- breast weight
- shoe size
- preferred sex position
- how many masturbations per week
- with how many men (and women) they had sex
- did or would like to be gang-banged
and whatnot
Certainly quite a lot of privacy is spreaded public in these shows.

I promise, this will be my last posting in this thread. Some corrections to the employment data I will keep for myself.

@kasenit

The 'blue' set went through several changes. At first, the pole could be seen in full centre view and there were couches either side. IIRC that lasted until the early part of  2006.

Version 2. With curtains and the pole I believe shifted to the left of the set.  Maybe the curtains were just for the 'specials'

Version 3 from late spring/early summer. No curtains. The centre piece of set is a small high table with a black telephone.

But with all dates etc, we all rely on our memories. And ,as boardmod said, there is no real purpose in this information. More of a curiousity value.

@BoardMod:"...what real purpose does it achieve?"

Thank you BoardMod, but that was my first thought when I read about kasenit's wish for "occupation (What a word in its German meaning!) dates"? Where is the use and sense of these specific data?? I can't find any, they're private and they're useless.

Some writers should remember our laws of protecting personal data and remember that the girls are public persons but private persons, too.

The whole action reminds me of snooping around in the girls' past.

So let's abandon these dates.

Just found one of the little discrepancies:
There is a video from Railly dated 060308, clearly in a set with sofa and curtains. But JohnF, in his list lower down, states this studio was from spring to summer 2005 Who/what is wrong?

@BoardMod:
I think I have to chime in again. I can accept your intent to keep the same look for all lists. As most of the data is in this thread now (maybe not all correct...) I basically have what I wanted. If correcions should be necessary, they can be included here anytime.
Thanks for all the contributors!

Back on topic. Cousin you should be ashamed. Wait til I speak to your mother.

The request is to include starting and leaving dates of models on the ratings page.

Firstly, it is not my decision and I only comment from the practicality point of view. It is possible using that field (there is just enough space)

But the point is that the web site should be uniform. Each page should have the same look. If the information is provided for the ETV girls then the members who frequent the other pages will also seek this information. And it may not be so easily obtainable.

Ferthermore what real purpose does it achieve ?. We have a real distinction now - current and previous. Even that can be difficult to maintain accurately. Adding even more information will just increase the workload for no real benefit.

That would be the 17:59. Always 16 minutes late.

Ok cousin. Sorry. No more flipancy from me (the tenner is under the door-mat)

Sounds like you learnd it while waiting for the train to Ashford, it leaves 18:55 ;-)

btw. we are totally off topic, maybe BoardMod would be so kind to remove the ot-posts, so the thread stays open for posting.

I remember Waterloo 1815 really well.

The French lost.

End of History Lesson ;-))

I’m expecting to read a lot more from 'The History Teacher', as he apparently remembers Waterloo 1815 quite well … ;-)

They ran several of the POM featurettes or atleast they used the video and overlaid that with some of their advertising blurb.

Quite co-incidentally, Cleo was featured as she was a POM. It would only be later that she became an ETV girl. Shame that some of the others (espec one dark-skinned girl) did not take the same route.

Let me clarify one point. The 'arguement' centres around the simulcast. Same girls - soft on the promo channel and hard when you parted with your 99 euro (or whatever it cost back then) for the card and the same if you happened not to have a compatable CAM. Guess who coughed up ;-)

What I am saying, and it is only my opinion not a gospel, that the simulcast was entirely to promote the encrypted service. When I made the INXTC clips you could hear the caller who often said "Why cannot I see?" to which the girl replied ""You need a card and watch INXTC". If that is not promotion then what is.

One other fact about Cleo. She did work for INXTC. I believe the 'Naked News' program first ran on that channel (I was not a subsciber then but recall it mentined on their site with some clips) and the well known clip is from a repeat showing. She was also the 'face' of INXTC as she was featured in their commercials of 'How to buy a card/cam'

This was another lesson from 'The History Teacher' ;-)

There are some things I don’t understand.
If it was only a promotional channel for INXTC, I expected them featuring the same models.. Right???
DB wrote: Oct 2004 - Feb 2005 = ads, promo films (Playboy) and soft repeats of INXTC live shows. I have posted several clips of this period which featured Slaveya and the Playboy one that featured Cleo.
How does the Cleo film fit in it??? I don’t remember her as a part of the INXTC shows (I wasn’t following neither of the channels very closely, as my interest in ETV started in late November 2005. The reason for that is obvious ;-).)
 

History teacher here.

Do not twist my words. I did not say that ETV just ran ads. I said it was a promotional channel for INXTC. There is a big difference.

I was actually watching those simulcast shows so please give me a little credit.

So let me expand once and for all on the 'history'

Oct 2004 - Feb 2005 = ads, promo films (Playboy) and soft repeats of INXTC live shows. I have posted several clips of this period which featured Slaveya and the Playboy one that featured Cleo.

Feb 2005 - April 2005 = simulcast 'dildo shows' and first hour (soft) of the Saturday party nights

May /June 2005 = separate programing 30 minute 'Hot Time' shows and shortly followed by the first night shows EXCLUSIVELY on ETV

And if I really wanted to be pedantic I could state that ETV did not really exist until it had a separate channel idenity away from INXTC and that was not until the summer/autumn of 2005.

But if you can actually find some live shows on ETV from October 2004, or even before the start of the simulcasts, then I would be interested in seeing them.