| Autor | Beiträge |
|---|---|
|
Peace and a good weekend to you too
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ kenny
o.k. fair enough . . . but I dont believe a single word what etv says, you take most of it seriously . . . and obviously that is the main difference between us.  I dont think Leslie is so stupid to behave this way and continue even after warning, that is just not plausible, but I am convinced because of experiences over the last years that etv are liars, not only here, it is very common that they lie at every occasion, just to keep their faces . . . they never would consider own faults. It is not only about Leslie, the way they treat their models is always the same, no respect at all. Why do you think they have such an enormous fluctuation? Are all this dozens of girls to blame? Couldnt there be another problem there? I also know the trend to BYOD, and I think that is the most stupid thing you can do in business. It only makes problems in terms of security and responsibilty. In my company stricly nobody is allowed to bring his own device, and I like that. And btw.: without "BYOD" this specific problem here simply didnt happen. So please now . . Peace, and have a nice weekend! |
|
|
|
|
pepe84 wrote:kennyboy2012 wrote:oh dear, think what you are saying. a girl has a job, and she is allowed to use her phone for that job. in my company, staff use their own devices, its common in our industry and its becoming common place globally, its termed BYOD polices ('Bring Your Own Device' ) and the girls were probably using the ETV wifi so it wouldn't cost them anything. in many industry, workers use their own tools, Car mechanic, carpenters, IT people, chefs use their own knife sets, to name but a few. I agree as I have already said, that publishing the details wasn't a good move and I disagree with that. "noone else than etv-staff is to blame here in my opinion, and I dont care if you like it or not" Well we agree to disagree on that, you are entitled to your opinion just as much as I am. but for anyone defending Leslie and saying its all ETVs fault. If someone that worked for you, comes up to you and slaps your face after you ask them to do a job that you are paying them for, would that be your fault or theirs? it seems some of you think its your fault, which is bizarre to say the least. |
|
|
|
|
kennyboy2012 wrote:oh dear, think what you are saying. a girl has a job, and she is allowed to use her phone for that job. allowed to use her phone? . . . no, they told her to use ther private phone for etv-purposes. A decent company would never ask or force employees to use their private equpment for the business. Also, if you believe their official version I cant help you anyway . . . that story is not credible at all. And as mentioned by best-reporting and some others before, the publication of details of dismission, is that professional for you? Sorry, we will not find together here . . . noone else than etv-staff is to blame here in my opinion, and I dont care if you like it or not, I cant take you serious anymore, it is like discussing with Angelina herself, so better stop here. |
|
|
|
|
|
oh dear, think what you are saying. a girl has a job, and she is allowed to use her phone for that job. so she uses it for other purpose. they warn her, and she still does it. that is clearly her own fault, no one else's. she is responsible for her own actions. fact.
If you pay someone to do a job, and they don't do it, and you give them a warning, and they still don't do it, then you have no choice but to stop employing them, especially if they are on a trial for the job! don't just use this as a cheap shot at ETV, just because you liked the girl. I liked her, she had a lot of potential, and she was gorgeous. but she was fired for breaking the rules and ignoring the warnings. What you are saying is that you'd employ someone who would not do their job or do as instructed, and even when warned, they would ignore you? That's what you are saying! |
|
|
|
|
kennyboy2012 wrote:anelleS wrote:A decent employer? i can not agree at all . . . a decent employer would give them phones to work, and not make them use their private phones to work for etv. everbody knows what young women do when they have their phones, they are out of the world, i dont like it, but sadly that is a fact. Not the girl was unprofessional, once again etv sucked. But of course you protect these arrogant idiots once again, like you always do. With a model like Leslie they had a slightly chance to revitalize my interest for this wrecked channel, but they once again they destroyed this little hope inmediately. However, instead of firing one of the most promising model, since a long time the first one with star-potential, the brainless idiot from the staff who got this shitty idea should be fired. No wonder that they dont get decent personal. Right now only 27 active models left, 3-4 years ago there was about the double quantity (and quality) of models. As long as this channel is driven by persons in charge and "art directors" like Angelina, Hans and Elly there is no hope that the downward spiral can ever be stopped. |
|
|
|
|
anelleS wrote:A decent employer? no . . . a bunch of rats who ever blame others (models or costumers) for the result of their own faults[/quote] in this case, from what they say, she was warned first and continued to do it. So she only has herself to blame, she was still on her trial and she had a warning and ignored it, they were right to fire her, this would be normal in most work places. But I'm not sure they should have posted the details on the wall like they did. Sorry but you cant blame ETV for this one, it was her actions not theirs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was searching her name for next week show !!! Oooh my really really what is happening !!! Are they want to close the channel ? All my favourite leaving one after one. The number of model decreased. At lease bring new models. Before one year it was the best period for me with channel. Now it is worst ...
|
|
|
|
anelleS wrote:. . . . No, they have not only allowed them to have their phones. But it was their job in this evening show to have their phones and to chat with the customers of ETV ... and not with their private friends. . . . so etv gave the models "their phones" to use it for the work for etv? That makes it even worse . . . anelleS wrote:A decent employer? no . . . a bunch of rats who ever blame others (models or costumers) for the result of their own faults |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps she was waiting for something "creative and artistic" to do? Of course in the bad old days she would have been too busy talking to someone on the phone to have time for social media.
|
|
|
|
|
strange story . . . .
 they allowed them to have their phones during the show but didnt allow them to use social media at the same time? That makes no sense for me, that cannot be the whole story. That is simply not credible, maybe she refused to get a tatoo, that would be even more credible at this place. Too bad . . .. after a long time there was a new girl with style, talent and beauty coming to eurotic, no tats, no fake-boobs, just great body and face, but again didnt stay long. Maybe she was too good for this shitty place etv has become. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leslie, you put your smart phone, otherwise there's stress.
That would have been enough yet. Typical ETV.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If it is true i think she wasn't so smart doing it. i'm sorry she has a great body
|
|
|
|
|
They removed her from the Sunday evening show and she is also not scheduled for next week. They fired her...
|
|
|
|
|
|
That wasn't Leslie
|
|
|
|
