directors - necessary or not?

0 (0 Bewertung(en))

(keine Bewertung bisher)

  • Pages (1):
  • 1
Autor Beiträge

29.03.2008, 15:06

directors - necessary or not?

ETV becoms worse, worse, worse...

Now the directors of the night shows command the girls which outfit they must take! So the individual outfit of a girl - which is for some spectators an important reason to love a model! - ist destroyed! All is standardized, there is no longer any individuality of the girls ! And the spectator has no longer a chance to wish a special outfit for "his" girl in the next show.

The best shows were in former times when there was no director. The directors now often destroy a good show!!!

I suggest to make the shows much more worse: Take Uniforms which cover the whole body of the girls!

30.03.2008, 19:12

Re: directors - necessary or not?

Jonas did you read my post to the end? I wrote that my theory doesnt stand when you have blind idiots as directors. So in this case I totally agree with you. I only wanted to say that I hate girls that stay whole show in long jeans. I also cant understand why viviana doesnt show her legs at all and her ass.

30.03.2008, 18:07

Re: directors - necessary or not?

I have to agree with jonas's first post. The shows when the girls were moderating themselves were the most sexy and appealing ones. But most of the charismatic models have gone anyway.

30.03.2008, 16:19

Re: directors - necessary or not?

Klemi, the problem is that my favourite girl did nearly always show her naked beautiful legs, she did wear sexy mini skirts - that was her normal outfit, and so I loved her. But last week she was forced by the directors to dress in unsexy long leggings , to hide her beautiful legs!

29.03.2008, 23:10

Re: directors - necessary or not?

I dont agree with you. I agree with LiveshowMAN. Girla should not be allowed to work as they come dressed to work. Certainly I would not allowe that they are fully dressed and the first thing I would say no is like a friend here says also to wear jeans, long jeans I mean. But Jonas of course my theory isnt correct when a director is an idiot and also a blind one. By the way ordinary people like me come to work, and when I arrive I have to wear a suit and a tie. So....whats the problem???

29.03.2008, 17:34

Re: directors - necessary or not?

To Liveshowman:

You are aboslutly right with your comment about Sabrina: She is hot on ETV 1 and a joke on ETV 2. Hey, can you do what you want in your work when you have been send to another Bureau or Part of the firm you are working and there you don´t like the people or work you do nothing? I think not. You get warned by your chief.

The new ones Viviana and Athina tries her best especially Vivi is in a good mood and dances and shows a lot. Athina is falling back to her beginning. She isn´t hot like yesterday evening. But this is the problem of ETV 2. Some models are really into their work there and others don´t do anything and think they get paid for her acting.

They really neéd a director or cameraman there. I mean whole europe can watch them. Didn´t they realize that??

Markus

PS: Viviana now tries to warm up Athina. Let´s see if she has success :-)

29.03.2008, 17:03

Re: directors - necessary or not?

I think it´s important that someone (not nessesarly the directors, just someone) has some influence over the choice of clothes. I think a 'certain dresscode' must be upheld! I personally think it´s an absolute dissaster to have girls running around in for ex baggy jeans/pants in an erotic liveshow. Some of the girls obviously should not be allowed to pick out their own outfits!

One style that should really be prohibited is the 'fully dressed in ordinary everyday clothes' style! lol

Just a note;

I just checked the two ETV channels just for the fun of it (not even Carmen can make me watch these channels anymore these days) and I am chocked by just how bad ETV2 (still) is! Sabrina is fully dressed including sunglasses being really rude, sitting down almost falling asleep, two other models I´ve never seen before are sitting doing basically nothing also, on occasion getting up to dance a little and flash a tit. All three are FULLY dressed in rather plain clothes.  I´d say that ETV2 NEEDS a director, if nothing else then to keep some of the models awake! Good resolution and video quality or not, ETV2 must be one of the absolute WORST liveshow channels on satellite. Someone pull the plug please!

Is there such a thing as an 'Erotic liveshow for dumbies' book? If so, send a copy to B*****A!

29.03.2008, 16:41

Re: directors - necessary or not?

HvB, partly you are right. I remember Jerry who did moderate and direct wonderful shows though she was before the camera, and she was also a good model!

But I criticized epecially that the directors have too much influence. They must not say which clothes the models wear in a show! Of course they can say that tired girls should wake up!

29.03.2008, 15:53

Re: directors - necessary or not?

There were times, when no director was needed, because there were models who had fun in making a show, who were able to carry a show and who were able to take the others with them. Now take a look at the current girls. Without a director a lot of them would sit in the corner for five hours just waiting for the end of the “show”. They even do so with a director.
Now take a look at the “directors”. Do you really wonder that the shows are that horrible?

29.03.2008, 15:40

Re: directors - necessary or not?

The next uniform will be a burqa !

  • Pages (1):
  • 1