Watching by numbers

An interesting way to pass the time and to work out how disastrous a show is going to be is to go mathematical:

Add together the girls page rankings of all the girls in a show
Divide by the number of girls
And hey presto, you have how terrible the show will be.

For example tonight:

On E2 we have Lace (49) and Mimosa (54) = 103 divided by 2 = 51.5 (i.e. catastrophic)
On E1 we have Clio (17), Vanessa (45), Jennifer (39), Monna (43), Penelope (28), Kim (20), Kleopatra (21) = 213 divided by 7 = 30.4 (i.e. fairly poor)

The schedule this morning Elsa (1), Patricia (2), Sabrina (3), Viviana (4) and Tifani (29) coef 7.8

Cameraworks of the show : static views and almost no close-up during 6 hours

The schedule this afternoon Malena (14), kleopatra (16) , Sugar (9), Jennifer(40), Gabriela (33) coef 22.4

Cameraworks of the show : only good close-up with cameraman around the girls.

No comment !

<<< The right formula is 90-60-90. :-DD>>>

and the other leg too

The right formula is 90-60-90. :-DD

Talking about ETV, it would be better "eroticism is firstofall feet". :)))))))))))))

<<< Eroticism isn't a math formula. >>>
 

and eroticism isn't only tits and pussies... it's legs too.

I agree with you glassy, I think bellerophon just played a game.

Eroticism isn't a math formula.

I"m sorry to throw all your mathmatical equations out the window. But I have an easier way of telling if a show is gonna be good. I count the number of hot models in the show and multiply the figure by two (tits) If the answer is 10 or more (5 hot models) then it should be good. Between 6 to 10 maybe slow and boring. Less thean 6 then just go to bed or paint a door. Good EH !

So now we have: Viviana (3), Lilian (34), Athina (12), Jessy (38), Tessa (16), show coefficient 20.6.

hum... so what's the average of my dream team?

Clio (17), Evah (24), Gia (6), Barbie (13), Kleopatra (21), Chary (44) = 20,8