Now on ETV - The current show

Will lightening strike twice I wonder I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if I seen ETV make a return to UK SKY, if what we are now seeing is anything to go on then it could be deemed as a rehearsal for things to come, unlike the last time however, I see no reason as to why they'd wish to team up with Cellcast again, I'd imagine they'd probably want to buy an EPG Space outright. Watch this space as the possibility cannot be ruled out until such point when the shows return to normality.

TazDevil wrote:That sounds to me like ETV have decided to align their free to air TV channel with the Ofcom rules and be exactly the same as the other UK channels who only show topless and arse on TV. I suspect this is so they can try again at broadcasting to new customers and attract new paying members. It isn't therefore so much about how good their TV service is in comparison to the competition, but what they offer for cash online. Here it appears the competition has harder shows, however, the girls are less girl next door types, they mostly have fake tits.

This was published, judging from the context, about a year ago, it is an instructive reading regarding why the fta is soft, paid things, etc.:
[Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig]

Scottishbloke wrote:

TazDevil wrote:Have the Ofcom rules changed allowing more than topless, have the channels found a loophole to show more or are these channels still only able to show topless? Our European cousins can find these channels online if they offer something worth watching from the "Watch Live" link above.

I am keen to know watch they show on free to air TV that ETV are now choosing not to show for free. Thanks for your help.

Mate nude shows are allowed after 11PM and have to end no later than 5AM. The babes do ofcourse have to be very careful not to show any open leg shot as exposure of the vaginas intimate bits is a big no no and if ofcom notice it and deem that the channel did it on purpose then they will be fined, if the flash is accidental in general nothing will happen unless some puritanical know it all phones up and complains but ofcom are inconsistent but its well documented that they are shit scared of Babestation so in general tend to turn a blind eye to anything they tend to do or have done in the past

In the case of ETV its very much self imposed censorship in order to rip off naive customers , its all a con and to make it so laughable we can see exactly what is happening behind the curtains and I'd have to be very drunk in order to be parted away with my cash so easily. Difference between the UK channels and this one is we have rules and in ETV land we have greed and stupidity.

That sounds to me like ETV have decided to align their free to air TV channel with the Ofcom rules and be exactly the same as the other UK channels who only show topless and arse on TV. I suspect this is so they can try again at broadcasting to new customers and attract new paying members. It isn't therefore so much about how good their TV service is in comparison to the competition, but what they offer for cash online. Here it appears the competition has harder shows, however, the girls are less girl next door types, they mostly have fake tits.

It would seem there is no other perfect adult channel on tv, or is there? Someone please point me to the free channel with full frontal models and paid hot web shows with the same models. I need to find this channel please.

go here, please, as to stay on topic

[Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig]

Scottishbloke wrote:

ilian62 wrote:It is best seen on "Like" to the mutual communication Scottishbloke and kennyboy2012 like. especially when they come into the way Slow and George. "Like" it 0 .

Exactly this is the real purpose of having a forum for different opinions, without that then it renders the whole thing pointless

Slowfox wrote:Why don't you 2 sweethearts take your little pail and shovel and play here ?

[Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig]

Thanks for the invitation Slowfox but as you said yourself it was merely a joke

Slowfox wrote:It was merely a joke, which believe was also understood this way.

so I'll decline the offer if it's all the same

kennyboy2012 wrote:Interestingly, I didn't actually mention you in the first part of my post, so I wonder why you jumped back so quick, unless I struck a nerve. Has this been said before, maybe, in regards to your comments, elsewhere

Hence the reason I mentioned to you on your use of the quotation button, backspace what you don't need and if it helps also use notepad to make it easier for you if its a sequence of quotes just so that nobody is in any doubt as to who you are responding to, that way all confusion is eradicated, this will answer your I wonder why you jumped in so quickly question

what I see here is a lot of water and no soup, sorry

ilian62 wrote:It is best seen on "Like" to the mutual communication Scottishbloke and kennyboy2012 like. especially when they come into the way Slow and George. "Like" it 0 .

Exactly this is the real purpose of having a forum for different opinions, without that then it renders the whole thing pointless

Slowfox wrote:Why don't you 2 sweethearts take your little pail and shovel and play here ?

[Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig]

Thanks for the invitation Slowfox but as you said yourself it was merely a joke

Slowfox wrote:It was merely a joke, which believe was also understood this way.

so I'll decline the offer if it's all the same

kennyboy2012 wrote:Interestingly, I didn't actually mention you in the first part of my post, so I wonder why you jumped back so quick, unless I struck a nerve. Has this been said before, maybe, in regards to your comments, elsewhere

Hence the reason I mentioned to you on your use of the quotation button, backspace what you don't need and if it helps also use notepad to make it easier for you if its a sequence of quotes just so that nobody is in any doubt as to who you are responding to, that way all confusion is eradicated, this will answer your I wonder why you jumped in so quickly question

Why not, but I think that will be better on another day and 2 hours seems a little bit short for me.

But let's see how it works

Slowfox wrote:Why don't you 2 sweethearts take your little pail and shovel and play here ?

[Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig]

Alternatively there is the option to use the PM system.

Although it might be interesting for some, I still believe that many in this ETV dedicated thread are not really interested in the difference between UK channels and ETV and the pros and cons of either or. At least that goes for me. Too much to read and too personal also. People start to be interested only in the fight and not really in the subject anymore, i.e. contents don't matter but let's see who slaps whom better. Admittedly somehow amusing though.

The problem is, its like all other series of posts, with two differing viewpoints, they just veer of at an angle from the main topic without intention. his point is mainly ETV and raised other channels. I replied in kind to his points and correcting a bit and added in some relevant other information. , then he replied to my points, and so on. its just the way forums are, they are like conversations that just stray off topic. it happens. always has, always will, and yes, it can be annoying to those not interested, but that's forums for you

but back to ETV

I see Wednesday is bringing back the VIP Wishes for free, in a slightly new form, it looks good, roll on Wednesday

ilian62 wrote:It is best seen on "Like" to the mutual communication Scottishbloke and kennyboy2012 like. especially when they come into the way Slow and George. "Like" it 0 .
Persia says: the dogs bark and the caravan goes on.
after our : Speak what you want and it will be as we want.

And the likes make it right, only because there is a lobby of some certain people, who like the comments of their buddies anyway, regardless of contents and regardless of whether wrong or right ?

I believe both are right from their point of view, but kenny e.g. does not receive any likes as being a persona non grata amongst the crying bunch, for what he likes. His counter part receives a lot of likes as generally speaking only what people like to read and to hear and what is balsam on their torn souls as free riders of ETV until now.

In case I misunderstood your comment, I am sorry, and I ask you to please accept my apologies.

It is best seen on "Like" to the mutual communication Scottishbloke and kennyboy2012 like. especially when they come into the way Slow and George. "Like" it 0 .
Persia says: the dogs bark and the caravan goes on.
after our : Speak what you want and it will be as we want.

Why don't you 2 sweethearts take your little pail and shovel and play here ?

[Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig]

Alternatively there is the option to use the PM system.

Although it might be interesting for some, I still believe that many in this ETV dedicated thread are not really interested in the difference between UK channels and ETV and the pros and cons of either or. At least that goes for me. Too much to read and too personal also. People start to be interested only in the fight and not really in the subject anymore, i.e. contents don't matter but let's see who slaps whom better. Admittedly somehow amusing though.

Scottishbloke wrote:

kennyboy2012 wrote:and while we are on the subject, its quite amusing to note that babestation gets a lot of negative comments on another forum, in the same way as etv does here, and theres a few forum members here that used to be active there. But funnily enough, they seem to forget about that, and try and make out that babestation etc are a shining example of what etv should be, which is the opposite of what is posted on the other forum.
so every channel gets its fair share of abuse, and in some cases, from the same people lol

Kenny if you look hard enough you'll find my posts with regards to all the channels across the whole board are fair and honest, I will praise channels and criticise them in equal measure so you'll never get any double standards from me. No channel is a shining example. for example in the past I've referenced ETV as the shining example,. it's all about which channel I feel is currently on the best form which I'll base my current opinions on.

kennyboy2012 wrote:a question for scottishbloke: if you say that etv are finished as a show, can we assume that you will no longer watch it and therefore no longer be posting your running commentary?

No such luck Kenny and what leave you to run wild wild and unchallenged, I think not

BTW - Kenny please learn to quote properly as your style of quoting back to other members looks shabby and lazy!

Interestingly, I didn't actually mention you in the first part of my post, so I wonder why you jumped back so quick, unless I struck a nerve. Has this been said before, maybe, in regards to your comments, elsewhere

and as for style of quoting, I think the point made is more important that delivery style

Glad you wont be leaving, although I wonder how you'll be able to comment usefully on a channel that you wont pay towards and therefore wont watch. Sorry, my mistake, it doesn't stop you now ;)

te he , got to have a bit of banter on Sunday ;)

kennyboy2012 wrote:and while we are on the subject, its quite amusing to note that babestation gets a lot of negative comments on another forum, in the same way as etv does here, and theres a few forum members here that used to be active there. But funnily enough, they seem to forget about that, and try and make out that babestation etc are a shining example of what etv should be, which is the opposite of what is posted on the other forum.
so every channel gets its fair share of abuse, and in some cases, from the same people lol

Kenny if you look hard enough you'll find my posts with regards to all the channels across the whole board are fair and honest, I will praise channels and criticise them in equal measure so you'll never get any double standards from me. No channel is a shining example. for example in the past I've referenced ETV as the shining example,. it's all about which channel I feel is currently on the best form which I'll base my current opinions on.

kennyboy2012 wrote:a question for scottishbloke: if you say that etv are finished as a show, can we assume that you will no longer watch it and therefore no longer be posting your running commentary?

No such luck Kenny and what leave you to run wild wild and unchallenged, I think not

BTW - Kenny please learn to quote properly as your style of quoting back to other members looks shabby and lazy!

kennyboy2012 wrote:and to be fair, its usually the same small group of girls, doing very little, and IMHO its kinda repetitive and boring after a while

I can't help it but it sounds like the description of ETV after the big departure of models lately.. The same small group of people asking the same things from the same girls (even I was guilty in the past). Seems like a degree of repetitiveness is unavoidable on channels like this, though it doesn't bother me that much to see Nancy's feet for the millionth time, etc.

GeorgeSK wrote:

kennyboy2012]They also offer bsx or babestation unleashed, which goes up to open leg and masturbation, but thats paid for and encrypted. (and its shit)
If you want more that tits and arse from a UK TV channel, you have to pay for it, fact</blockquote>

You can watch Babestation Unleashed for free online, only Private and BSX are paid channels on their website, sexstation.
[URL=http://www.imagebam.com/image/eff065459662836 wrote:[Verstecktes Bild - Registrierung notwendig][/URL]

that's online, not on the TV channels. and to be fair, its usually the same small group of girls, doing very little, and IMHO its kinda repetitive and boring after a while