My plumber suggests:

says Franz Ressel:
< “Having a partner like All Day Cinema, someone who is
redefining Pay TV in the US hospitality market, provides the perfect distribution channel for us.>

As I said in another topic Franz Ressel thinks to have found "the perfect distribution channel for his sh*t" !

Dear Mr. Ressel,
since I think Mr.Majors in a few weeks will burn all his money distributing your sh*t, I give an advice
you can use when Mr.Majors will help you no more:

I asked my plumber and he told me that common people use 120 mm pipeline.
Since you have, in your studio , some good "elements" who can produce a big amount of sh*t, my plumber
suggests you to use 240 mm pipeline.
In this way you can be sure all is OK, even if your " best elements " are all in the studio at the same time !

My plumber is a very kind person.
He is very different from you, he doesn't consider only money but also the way he makes money.
So he gives you this suggestion for free, he doesn't want money.
He asks you only a little courtesy:
distribute your sh*t in closed spaces ( as he suggests ) and stop to infest the air !

Thank you

Vappiano68

Your apology is accepted. The explantion of your infantile behaviour in removing the links is not. But do not worry about reposting the vids in the forums as I will now delete the topics and/or individual posts as they no longer have any purpose.

One other small piece of advice which is quite evident in the 'lecture' that followed the apology. You do take a very confrontational stance in your posts to any member who does not agree with you. Let me deal with those members if they breach any rules and confine your opinions to the purpose that these forums were created for THE DISCUSSION OF THE TV. Also it is not neccessary to repeat your initial point in subsequent posts ie 'ETV is DEAD' because that is lecturing. Accept that not everyone will agree with your point of view.

And finally, accept these words and do not even try to challenge them. One golden rule is never argue with a forum moderator. He may not always get it right but you do yourself no favours in trying to justify your actions as he will always have the final word.

And yes, these are the last words in this topic.

After the Vappiano68 retraction, I hope to see an atmosphere quiter. But without your quarrel and without quality shows, nothing to read on this forum ! Then a little subject of thinking : How to contend the censureship (responsible of the prudish shows) and be a censor of the posts ? Have a nive day !

@ OldGrizzly, Mr.Pink :

Having been encouraged by the solidarity of my forum friends
I "grasp the olive branch" and I accept to admit that the content of my post
could be a bit too much colourful.
I give you my assurance I will choose my words more carefully in the future but
I pretend to be assured that I have to censure only my words, not my thoughts.

Moreover I apologize with you for my long posts, but for me the forum is not the place to say:

" Hey guys. have you seen Clio's shoes ? "
" Yes, very beautiful " !

According to me the forum has other aims, which need to be explained and sometimes I need long posts.
Moreover my English is not "poetic".It's the English of a guy who, while working, makes a 5 min break
and writes a post using the only english words he knows.
So reading should not be difficult.

As regards persons who can make decisions:
I think they would not consider my posts even if my posts were made of a single syllable !

Now I think I have completely clarified my position.
Tell me if all is OK.
--------------------------
@ OldGrizzly:

< You, and all the rest of the members of these forums, may now wish to learn
what a fine fellow Vappiano really is. >
< Quite an 'adult' way to go about things.>

Vappiano68 is a fellow who "sua sponte" chose to share his work with his "forum friends".
Removing my videos I just wanted to know if these members were my friends for my ideas
or only for my videos.
Now I can say that they are friends in the right way !
As you can see every action of mine has a logic explanation.
So I would be really happy if, as I made my retraction , the same way you adfirm that the "real Vappiano68"
is not the fellow with infantile and stupid behaviour you described yesterday.

-------------------
@ cdrw04,erik :

I made my apologize to the board admin for my long posts.
Surely I have not to apologize with common forum members:
nobody of you is obliged to read my posts.
When you go in a bookstall do you read all the different newspapers ?
------------------
@ Counterstrike :

Your dictionary is made up of 3 sentences.
Every morning you login the forum and write casually these 3 sentences:
do you think it is a very useful behaviour ? do you offer something to think about ? do you offer something else ?

As I said many times: when you read my name pass over !
I said nothing about you even when you were in the cold jail-house ...
------------------
@ all my friends:

Thank you very much

Dear Old Grizzly and cdrw04

I agree with you. I'm tired too, to read Vappianos very long posts.

To Vappiano: Did you really think the bosses of ETV would read your comments?????? They don't care about you

@cdrw

I come round to your opinion about this thread.

I am bored of reading terribly long posts every day which remind me of Don Quijote's tilting at windmills.

@ cdrw04
Because you like etv as they are now.
I said what you take drugs or smoke that you like what etv offers
I would follow the same treatment you this because I am sick.

just ban him and close this thread already.

yes we get it : you dont like etv. but do you have to open 100 topics about this? no.

if you dont like it, switch over. simple as that.

@Vappiano

It seems that there are people in these forums that wish you to stay a little while longer. Although you have been previously warned, and it is not neccessary to continue warning any member, you did continue the somewhat unique form of abuse. There has been no changes in the rules. It is just that you cannot see when you break them.

But I am a resonable man. Others have been told about their use of colourful language and most of them have heeded the warnings. The ones that do not have been and will continue to be dealt with in an appropiate manner.

Mr Pink has given you an olive branch. It is up to you now whether you grasp it. All you now have to do is apologise for the abusive content of this topic and give your assurance that you will choose your words more carefully in the future.

And because I am a resonable person I will give you a full 24 hours to make this retraction. But just to make things perfectly clear if you do make the retraction and chose to revert back to your current ways you will be dealt with.

@ OldGrizzly : before to describe as infantile and stupid my behaviour
try to analyze if your behaviour towards me is correct !

@ OldGrizzly , Mr. Pink

Continue to count the hours. I have nothing more to say, also because
I can't stay no more at pc, I have to go out.
Take your decision but remember a thing:

I can accept to censore my words but not my thoughts.I will never do it.

@ ghostwriter2008

< but what i thought is that he could get his mind clean while he's on holiday
for one week in and get a 2nd chance after that >

Thank you but I have no intention to stay one single minute in the jail-house
because when I wrote I did nothing against the rules.
If the sheriff wants to ban a member he has to define clearly the rules before and not after !

@ glassy,nico,Alex and all other friends:

Now I have to go out
Thank you very much.

vappiano, what I wonder is: what's the purpose of the tons of words you write? What do you expect? Do you really think that anyone from ETV is going to read your comments as long as your words are offending and your style of writing doesn't get more polite? Sure, members will read your books, but definitely not any person who can make decisions.

The removal of the links is infantile behavior. I do not respond to threats of blackmail.

6 hours.

PS. You really should read the posts of your 'friends' before you make such stupid remarks.

@OldGrizzly

I agree totally with nico, come on Old Grizlly, I understand you, but give vappiano an another break!

We all make mistakes.......

Greetings:-)

Save Vappiano68==he/she gives us more to talk about than Eurotic does ha ha. Ban the bomb but not vappiano68 I say.

@ OldGrizzly:

Dear sheriff, do you remember this post ?

< The initial post of this topic was edited after the general warning from yesterday.
That edit constitutes a new post wether you like it or not. FOUR left >

It's the final post of the original topic with the warning.
Since then I used many other times "that" word in its censored version, but I never saw :

Three left,two left,one left .

Now you tell me I am an outlaw.
Where I can read your laws ?
Where could I find you warnings that also the censored version was against the rules ?

Absolutely nowhere !!!

< You do not seem to be able to give a good reason why I should not ban you for inappropiate language and other things >

1) If also the censored version was against the rules you had to tell me this before,
the first time I used the censored version.

2) What are these "other things" for which you can ban me ?
I see many other members are warned when they are wrong and you tell them:
"next time I will cancel your post" or
"next time you will go in my jail ".
On the contrary you warn me after having taken your decision and,
most of all,for having violated some rules which don't exist or
without explaining clearly what I could say or not.

BTW : if you let me stay every single video of mine will be re-uploaded,
but you can't think to kick my a*s out of the forum without reasons
and continue to take advantage of my work !

-------------------
@ nico , Bad-Boy

many thanks for your solidarity