Autor | Beiträge |
---|---|
|
|
i THINK it's not so diificult give girls freedom of action, and do a good show like Jasmine yesterday
|
|
|
|
tunturi wrote:Jasmine show last night what the show can be best Yes, she definitely stole the show from everyone else |
|
|
|
Jasmine show last night what the show can be best
normal night program momentarily. |
|
|
|
Oh boy..that was definitely a "good" way to waste this extra hour
But..lucky girls ...due to the mood and behaviour they had , it was another night party and celebrate their (last?) birthday. |
|
|
|
Last night show I sent message to Effy for first time. The message showed in the screen after 3 and half hour. I slept before I see it. The streem stopped and I lost the show from the website. From tv the hardest stopped and did not recored the full show but at lease my dvd recorded was still working and I saw the reaction from Effy. It was difficult night for me. The bad news also the winter time started and in my country we do not have winter time so now the night show starts 1 am and I should walk up for my work at 5 am !!!
|
|
|
|
ETV had made a lot of bad shows in the past and every time they made a good/better show, we all hope that it would better, but ETV could top this with a more worst show.
For me the birthday party was the top of desaster or the bottem of worst. Ok, we now ETV say until today It was for me an overall desaster - the cast looks more like a friday or saturday nightshow with more models, not a birthday party - from the new, fresh models only destiny and isadore on the cast and both had to be shy - the room for the party was only the normal studio, not a party location - two shows, I could not say party to yesterday, in parallel is never a good think - switching the girls from one studio to the other was boring, for the ns are more models on the cast than ever (except the old birthdaypartys) and sometimes you see only 4 or 5 girls in the studio, only with this switches they lost a lot of caller credits - they reached not all wishes due to technical problems or they ignore wishes, so why should I buy credits? - on top than the technical problems, I tought that the party should animate viewers to buy credits, now it prevents from buying something I wait eagerly if we hear something from etv to this desaster. |
|
|
|
logic wrote:tux.friend wrote:shagshaggy wrote:Penelope said today that this is the first time more viewers watched etvshow.com versus the tv show. anyone calling can ask her about that. This was based on the penelope statement "more viewers watch etvshow.com than tv show". To have this ratio you must count both or use some estimate. For advertising it is important to know this. In the web the advertising price is based on clicks/viewers of a site and in tv it is the same. A lot (most or all) of free websites, sells place for advertising and the income for this is based on the clicks on the site. I dont know why etv dont use this to generate more income, or ist the number of distinct viewers to less to get a valuable income? |
|
|
|
Last night is a true reflection of the ETV of the last 5 years:
disorganization, inaccuracy, incompetence, arrogance and lack of imagination. The provider is out and they can't broadcast anything better than what we've seen on the SAT? Tedium, bored girls, models which didn't know what to do, models that did everything to not do anything, some models really embarrassing for an erotic channel, schizophrenic direction, cameramen unable to use a camera .....and so on... Only five years ago with this cast, despite some piece of forniture dressed like a model, they would make money hand over fist........ However, my best congratulations to all those who've paid for the show on the web ..... |
|
|
|
ETV is more and more become a no boobs channel.
For example: Kia, Trixy, Angelina,Kelly, Dacota, Yoko,Isadora and of course since 9 years the boring and unerotic Penelope. Kristal and Zoe are models who are worth to look in exclusive. robert58 |
|
|
|
Joker1305 wrote:logic wrote:...But if they mean callers and SMS vs. webshow viewers, and not revenue of each, that would mean the web shows still bring much less money than the night shows. satelit is always good when the "server failure". When the satellite is difficult to prevent the recordings show. Advertising liveshow sees the satellite more viewers than @. Premium show is @, and it goes without ads. Regards Juraj |
|
|
|
logic wrote:...But if they mean callers and SMS vs. webshow viewers, and not revenue of each, that would mean the web shows still bring much less money than the night shows. OK, the satellite broadcast is very expensive, without they could live with much less revenue. On the other hand without satellite broadcast will be much harder for them to get new customers, I doubt it would still work as a pure webshow where they were only one of a million. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
tux.friend wrote:shagshaggy wrote:Penelope said today that this is the first time more viewers watched etvshow.com versus the tv show. anyone calling can ask her about that. Why the hell should they want to count TV-viewers? If they count something on TV than the callers and sms-senders...........the things that bring money. Maybe this was the comparison. |
|
|
|
tux.friend wrote:shagshaggy wrote:Penelope said today that this is the first time more viewers watched etvshow.com versus the tv show. anyone calling can ask her about that. Absolutely. Moreover: maybe they can know if i am logged in the web, but that doesn´t mean i am watching the show, in fact, i am almost always logged, and of couse i am not watching the shows all that time. |
|
|
|
shagshaggy wrote:Penelope said today that this is the first time more viewers watched etvshow.com versus the tv show. anyone calling can ask her about that. Did she mean the tv show or the exclusive? If I had no satellite and a fast Internet I use also etvshow. This says nothing about the ratio of viewers looks free or pays for the show. They cant know this. They only know how many viewers are on etvshow.com, thats easy its only a look into the webserver log. How many viewers are on the tv this was a rough estimate by etv. Nobody can count the viewers on an satellite. This was a marketing statement and/or the wish of etv. |
|
|