Eurotic's website & webstream

brudgon wrote:i can see the show on my tv but i have not the dvd recorder
i had want to record for foxy's first nightshow

Let's go cry both and sleep.

i can see the show on my tv but i have not the dvd recorder
i had want to record for foxy's first nightshow

brudgon wrote:

brokingbull wrote:

brudgon wrote:for almost all morning the website not work
...now it seems they fixed

Big time delay with white circles in Berlin. Right now.

again for me tonight and i can't record the show

For me too. Only white circle. I have checked my equipment. It is not our fault. It is up to ETV.

brokingbull wrote:

brudgon wrote:for almost all morning the website not work
...now it seems they fixed

Big time delay with white circles in Berlin. Right now.

again for me tonight and i can't record the show

brudgon wrote:for almost all morning the website not work
...now it seems they fixed

Big time delay with white circles in Berlin. Right now.

for almost all morning the website not work
...now it seems they fixed

I wonder what the usual writers on ETV-WALL would be their subject now that JU
and her gang seized the ELS.
Those guys learned very well praising even the most real shit-show performance.
JohnGuitar

Slowfox wrote:The discussion is not worth to continue anyway.

Yes, that´s why i open a new point of discussion about the reserved hours this week, which are the main (or only) point of discussion,seeing the schedule.

Wilsonsand wrote: i didn´t know it was so important what i buy and what i watch! thanks guys, we have resurrected this dying thread thanks to this stupid issue!

Slow, i talked about Gia not as proof, i did it to remember ridiculous things like that happened before, Gia did it many times in ns, and yes, i saw that shows, i usually saw Gia. Then there was better shows, there was something nice to watch at night. And one more time yes, Ava was wearing 2 panties and 2 bras, none discussion willl change that, and i think that is something ridiculous. We can stay in this stupid circle till the infinite, because i can´t show you here the proofs and you will never be able to proof i am wrong. What a pity caps are not allowed, right?

Ok. I give in. You are my hero with your vast knowledge and your caps, which in case you have them, you can only have obtained illegally.

The discussion is not worth to continue anyway.

And to those having drawn the White Knight card again, I recommend to read the last 2 pages again, as you did not understand a single word of what the arguement was about.

i didn´t know it was so important what i buy and what i watch! thanks guys, we have resurrected this dying thread thanks to this stupid issue!

Slow, i talked about Gia not as proof, i did it to remember ridiculous things like that happened before, Gia did it many times in ns, and yes, i saw that shows, i usually saw Gia. Then there was better shows, there was something nice to watch at night. And one more time yes, Ava was wearing 2 panties and 2 bras, none discussion willl change that, and i think that is something ridiculous. We can stay in this stupid circle till the infinite, because i can´t show you here the proofs and you will never be able to proof i am wrong. What a pity caps are not allowed, right?

Back to topic, it seems the reserved shows are finally the only web "shows" this week, 15 hours of boring blocking streaming!! 50x15=750 credits! with this income..why to make something more funny or premium shows?

I smell frustrated white knights caused by bad performance of Ava...........

maybe Wilsonsand has some friends which told him, do you know what friends are?

Watcher wrote:

vappiano68 wrote:

Slowfox wrote:

Wilsonsand wrote:Yes, Slow, all of that things but the last Ava did the show with 2 panties and 2 bras on, that's true and i think its ridiculous.

p.s: knowledge has a lot of ways

Then please give proof of your source, Sir, as otherwise I, as haven't seen the show, cannot believe you and thus can only assume that you are making up things.

Nevermind. The ice is rather thin though when delivering facts based on hear / say only.

Just 2 questions:

when some members say: "great premium from "model x":

- why don't you ask if he/she really watched the show?
- why don't you ask him/her about his/her source?

I think that this thread is going to take a turn for the worst.
Maybe a little 2-days closing of the thread would be healthy for itself.
.
Or better:
maybe this thread should be used only to give informations about schedule, technical issues, etc,
excluding any review about the content.
It's a nonsense to express a review (both positve and negative reviews).about something that cannot be proved here with the videos.

If you care to track this discussion to its beginning you will se that you are creating a totally disconnected argument.
The whole point is:-

Wilsonsand wrote:the thing is i didn´t watch it, but i know it! i wanted to share it here with people who was intrigued about her show.

No Watcher, if you want to be precise, the discussion began after this post:

Wilsonsand wrote:How ridiculous Ava yesterday in the Slow exploring show!! with 2 panties and 2 bras!

and it began precisely thanks to your following post. Why do you ask if he watched or not?
Simple:
- if someone answer he watched, then you can say "ridiculous, why did you watch?".
- if someone answer he didn't watch, then you can say "how can you know? Gimme the proof."

So this discussion is totally without any sense here in this forum, where videos cannot be posted.

My idea is simple:
this thread shouldn't allow to post reviews of the shows, because only members who bought the premium have the right to make a review.
But if they are the only ones having this right, being ETV's customers, they can do their fantastic reviews on ETV site.

A duplication of these reviews here has no meaning different from "advertisment".

Slowfox wrote:

Wilsonsand wrote:By the way, its something ridiculous but not new. I remember Gia did the same and i said the same then.

Ah well, that is definitely a stable argument and same time proof hammered into stone

In all fairness ...

Ahh! But did he watch that show?

Wilsonsand wrote:By the way, its something ridiculous but not new. I remember Gia did the same and i said the same then.

Ah well, that is definitely a stable argument and same time proof hammered into stone

In all fairness ...