Eurotic's website & webstream

Angelika wrote:

Chris26 wrote:Says the one who wrote a disgustingly mocking posts towards stanislavskij (with a list of mockeries and all) before deleting it after 10 minutes and writing the "politically correct" one.

Congratulations!

well it's nothing new that white knights tend to be hyprocrites as well...


...and I'm pretty sure even that they pretend to just be friends with certain models and to protect them and be nice guys who never think of dirty things they'll have the biggest archieves of pussy-related-videos of their sweetheart for sure.

Since you surely do not have access to any of 'our' video archives and we all know that you do not make up stories to annoy other forum members, you must be writing from experience ... back in your 'White knight' days.

...and I'm pretty sure even that they pretend to just be friends with certain models and to protect them and be nice guys who never think of dirty things they'll have the biggest archieves of pussy-related-videos of their sweetheart for sure.[/quote]

Hi! Of course, that's what it is, but it is perhaps natural, none of the girls is not an innocent angel.
Often you will see that the girls pose for the cameras, and the image of the camera can not see what is happening with the material recorded at the time (and they are not soft shots)?
You can guess themselves.
Regards Ironboy.

Slowfox wrote:I do not owe you an explanation

one of the common sentences among the white-knight-fraciton, they don't owe us explanations, sources etc. but they always ask for ours

as I basically can't and shouldn't care less about you and your polemic comments,

also often used: they don't care but of course they use their precious time to answer... and of course to judge people with other opinions. with sentences like "your polemic comments" they are not interested in a meaningful discussion even that they always pretend they are the only ones who are interested in it.

Contrary to others I am at least trying to think once in a while.

again insulting people with other opinions and not caring about a meaningful discussions. in the same way they are the first and loudest to cry if the "other side" is provocative.

All you guys are always talking about free speech and freedom of opinion. I took the freedom to delete my very own comment. what's the issue ?

that you only care about free speech and freedom of opinion if it fits your ideas and opinions and no one critizises ETV.

Believe we are completely loosing sight of the topic.

again a favourite sentence from the white knights. if they run out of arguments they try to finish the discussion because of "loosing sight of the topic". but of course this only fits for the others, never for them. never forget: white knights are always right.

But who cares ....

obviously you do, because even that a few sentences ago you already pretended to not care you are still writing about this...

Chris26 wrote:Says the one who wrote a disgustingly mocking posts towards stanislavskij (with a list of mockeries and all) before deleting it after 10 minutes and writing the "politically correct" one.

Congratulations!

well it's nothing new that white knights tend to be hyprocrites as well...


...and I'm pretty sure even that they pretend to just be friends with certain models and to protect them and be nice guys who never think of dirty things they'll have the biggest archieves of pussy-related-videos of their sweetheart for sure.

Chris26 wrote:

Slowfox wrote:again I realize it is impossible to have a decent discussion.

Says the one who wrote a disgustingly mocking posts towards stanislavskij (with a list of mockeries and all) before deleting it after 10 minutes and writing the "politically correct" one.

Congratulations!

yes sir, you are absolutely right

I do not owe you an explanation as I basically can't and shouldn't care less about you and your polemic comments, however, I realized that my comment was unfair after reading it again. And that was the reason for the deletion. Contrary to others I am at least trying to think once in a while. In this particular case I saw I was incorrect and thus deleted the comment in favor of a more obejctive version.

All you guys are always talking about free speech and freedom of opinion. I took the freedom to delete my very own comment. what's the issue ?

And you found my post disgusting ? well, opinion tends to be disgusting for some, or ?

Believe we are completely loosing sight of the topic.

But who cares ....


P.S.: I see the lobby woks, and you never disappoint me there. Have you guys ever heard of Pavlov ?

Slowfox wrote:again I realize it is impossible to have a decent discussion.

Says the one who wrote a disgustingly mocking posts towards stanislavskij (with a list of mockeries and all) before deleting it after 10 minutes and writing the "politically correct" one.

Congratulations!

again I realize it is impossible to have a decent discussion.

it started with some exchange of opinions and ends again in some plain polemic and disguised attacks

... and not initiated by the so called white knights

have a great sunday

Slow - leaning back waiting for the next senseless offense

I suggest: politburo, intelligentsia, committee, cabinet, lodge.

Angelika wrote:

Watcher wrote:I'm sure that if someone offered constructive criticism, with justification of their stance, then a meaningful discussion would take place.
As you say, "... one lives in hope "

impossible to have a meaningful discussion because whenever someone even slightly critizises ETV, it's models or the people involed than the triumvirat of the white knights HvB, slowfox, nighthawk and Watcher appear in the thread to attack the user who wasn't 100% pleased with the product ETV and it's models deliver.

And until the mods treat the white knights just as they do with the people who always only critzise this forum has no substance at all, because everyone who doesn't have the opinion of the white knights is attacked by them, told that they have no idea, asked for their sources etc. It's the same old story every day, because the white knights who are in love with their favourite models in some kind of weird way doesn't even allow a small piece of criticism on their beloved girls or ETV itself.

And i'm sure no one would ever post just to try and start trouble, would they Leggie?

Watcher wrote:Actually, my 'White Knight' status has lapsed since somebody ate my horse

Into lasagne or canelloni

Tifosi wrote:...
The one problem I have with this site, is if you go into a model's discussion room and
critisise, then her fans go apeshit and say stay out of her room.
Weird stuff for a discussion thread.
Still, one lives in hope

But Slow didn't attack you, and I can't remember him attacking you in one of the girl's threads, so your quoting is out of context.
For a factual dicussion one should avoid that.
Anyway, IMHO discussions about liking or disliking a girl is useless. Who likes a girls will never convince one who doesn't like her and the other way round, so the girl's are basically the wrong place for a factual discussion.
To discuss a performance of a girl in a certain show there are threads like "The complaints department" and "Last night's show" or "Now on ETV - The current show" is the better place for objective and not insulting criticism.
That it's possible to do that you can see e.g. [Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig].

Regards
Joker

HvB wrote:

Angelika wrote:the triumvirat of the white knights HvB, slowfox, nighthawk and Watcher appear in the thread to attack the user who wasn't 100% pleased with the product ETV and it's models deliver.

From wikipedia:

Wikipedia wrote:A triumvirate (from Latin, "triumvirātus") is a political regime dominated by three powerful individuals, each a triumvir (pl. triumviri).

Maybe you should reconsider the use of the term triumvirate ...

Or it could be perm any three from four for 'The Triumvirate'
Actually, my 'White Knight' status has lapsed since somebody ate my horse

HvB wrote:

Angelika wrote:the triumvirat of the white knights HvB, slowfox, nighthawk and Watcher appear in the thread to attack the user who wasn't 100% pleased with the product ETV and it's models deliver.

From wikipedia:

Wikipedia wrote:A triumvirate (from Latin, "triumvirātus") is a political regime dominated by three powerful individuals, each a triumvir (pl. triumviri).

Maybe you should reconsider the use of the term triumvirate ...

The [Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig] fits better.

Angelika wrote:the triumvirat of the white knights HvB, slowfox, nighthawk and Watcher appear in the thread to attack the user who wasn't 100% pleased with the product ETV and it's models deliver.

From wikipedia:

Wikipedia wrote:A triumvirate (from Latin, "triumvirātus") is a political regime dominated by three powerful individuals, each a triumvir (pl. triumviri).

Maybe you should reconsider the use of the term triumvirate ...

Watcher wrote:I'm sure that if someone offered constructive criticism, with justification of their stance, then a meaningful discussion would take place.
As you say, "... one lives in hope "

impossible to have a meaningful discussion because whenever someone even slightly critizises ETV, it's models or the people involed than the triumvirat of the white knights HvB, slowfox, nighthawk and Watcher appear in the thread to attack the user who wasn't 100% pleased with the product ETV and it's models deliver.

And until the mods treat the white knights just as they do with the people who always only critzise this forum has no substance at all, because everyone who doesn't have the opinion of the white knights is attacked by them, told that they have no idea, asked for their sources etc. It's the same old story every day, because the white knights who are in love with their favourite models in some kind of weird way doesn't even allow a small piece of criticism on their beloved girls or ETV itself.