Autor | Beiträge |
---|---|
rotate13 wrote:Why you both don't you make an irc channel and get your problem solved. WOW! thats great news as we won't have to read this kind of shit anymore so your enjoying working for ETV then Rotate? merkele wrote:HvB wrote:Again ... Yep the Mods are happy with how their set up for us @outside saying a girl makes you feel like puking knowing who her fans are, is actually trolling, so don't call anyone else it until you read your own post, you set others up with that because you was losing the discussion so lower it to bullshit, the other trick when losing is to accuse others of working for ETV and was a trick in these threads for a long time. But thats all it is. |
|
|
|
vappiano68 wrote:Channel closed next year? Then why renewed sat licenses until 2022? I pray for a closed channel next year and hope that I can close the etv folders. |
|
|
|
Channel closed next year? Then why renewed sat licenses until 2022?
Surely I have no right to decide what to do, but my suggestion would be to close for a week this thread, so that everybody can calm down and the thread can go back in topic. |
|
|
|
Why you both don't you make an irc channel and get your problem solved.
That channel (FTA) soon will be closed down. Probably next year. First they gonna dump some of the telephonists and then cameramen and directors and everything will be online with remote controlled cameras by the viewers.( 1cr min.) |
|
|
|
HvB wrote:Again ... I can't tell you, sorry. This forum has rules. Which are pretty convenient for some, I'm sure. |
|
|
|
merkele wrote:HvB wrote:Only working way for a serious discussion is to have proof when asked for it. Again ... Where do I break the rules? I can't see anything like that ... |
|
|
|
HvB wrote:Only working way for a serious discussion is to have proof when asked for it. So are you suggesting that people break the rules of this forum, mainly those about the non-disclosure of the whereabouts of the studios and country? Rules that you are inherently breaking yourself everytime you post, but that's another story. |
|
|
|
zxcv wrote:HvB wrote:Why don't you just say it and include the source? So you think that making claims without any basis (or an imaginary basis) is the right way to lead a serious discussion? And meanwhile I react allergic to such posts. But according to you it would be ok if someone would write that the videos disapear from the hosters, because you work for the MPAA? According to you the one writing that wouldn't need to give any proof for that. According to outside it would be your duty to proove that you aren't working for them. Let me tell you a secret: you can't proove such a claim wrong as you would need to publish a list of all MPAA employees and agents and of course someone will write that list is incomplete and you didn't publish all names. No way out. No. Only working way for a serious discussion is to have proof when asked for it. And it is obvious how much truth is in their posts when they run away from the discussion. |
|
|
|
All these discussions are the real proof that, in fact, there's nothing more to say about ETV.
|
|
|
|
Tarl_Cabot wrote:zxcv wrote:...about ETV due to your close connection with the community there ..... quite irrelevant to the topic and situation. |
|
|
|
zxcv wrote:...about ETV due to your close connection with the community there ..... btw: the models are a quite good source for informations and everyone can call and try to get some infos. |
|
|
|
HvB wrote:Why don't you just say it and include the source? Maybe he has no many sources the same as you in order to figure it all out Nobody deny that you have ..A wealth of information ...about ETV due to your close connection with the community there .....But honestly your argument is still week enough and truly make no sense at all . Eventually , the availability of the reliable information are very necessary ....But on the other hand being well-informed figure doesn't mean that you really have the insight and the vision and are able to give a sound judgement . |
|
|
|
misto17 wrote:Hello guys, I love dark hints. They are so vague that it could be anything. Why don't you just say it and include the source? |
|
|
|
Hello guys,
I don't watch Etv since a long time (not my taste -I hate censorship and self censorship in first)- but I take pleasure to read on this forum and sometime I DL some vids when I've time. So please guys, stop this boring game, it's now an extensive bullshit that affects this forum. @hvb: Everybody on this forum (the old ones) knows who you are, it's not a pb for me, but please, as we says in France: "n'en remets pas une couche". Thanks to all to be fair and respectfull. Have a good night. |
|
|
|
nighthawk wrote:outside wrote:Just pointing it was an invention from Kaleya herself, replying to Julia, who named Clio as "little Kaleya". shaky-schumi wrote:Hmm so iguess i should name her "little Kaleya"than like Kaleya did and Hans does .( but there will always be one real Kaleya that i knew and know !!!!!! ) Kind Regards "Shaky"-Schumi ( the red/white shark)Shaky was just reporting what he heard from Kaleya's mouth (or I reported in another topic). |
|
|