Eurotic TV - General Discussion

carmen37 wrote:I agree with that new girl should be present in nightshow for example, Amy, Brianna, Carrie, Gia, Kristina, Nancy

A too good cast so that the chiefs of ETV want to put it.

Tarl_Cabot wrote:

klemi wrote:I really dont understand these people. One thing mostly is what the hell are they waiting with girls like Nancy or Carrie or Pam or Natasha? They should mix new girls with old models I dont accept any politics as that models decide themselves. This is nonsense, I rather say it is a strategy so that some viewers fall in love with these new girls, send tons of VIPs and maybe some day they will appear in a nightshow...Some of the sweetest ever never did AKA Candy. She was one of my favourites which Brianna never will be. As was also Maria.

to answer your nonsens:
one example for a self-deciding model is e.g. Sandra and some of the new model said that they won't / don't want do night shows.
maybe some of the models have private reason for their shifts because etv is just a way to earn some money for living and so they don't can or want to participate in night shows.
also it is possible to send VIPs in the daytime shows and we both remember the night show of Candy and how misplaced she was in it.
you should accept that the wish of a viewer isn't the main argument while making the schedule.

I insist that it is a form of strategy for guys falling in love with models especially soft ones, so first they really wanna pick those poor fellows, and if you watch carefully you can see how ridiculous some wishes are...No either etv has some moron in an office sending those quite sick messages sometimes to increase "message incoming" numbers or people are really so law in mind sometimes. ETV lateyl just follows those poor guys wishes and avoids anything erotic to happen whenever they can. Gia is certainly the case of etv strategy and that my theory isnt such nonsense you speak.

If we assume that the new girls do not want to participate in the night shows because they do not intend to undress.
It is the participation of girls in the night shows. It is the only way to see them in their underwear, although (as we know, forbidden in the show day) Brianna and Nancy have shown previously that they have no problem with that.

klemi wrote:I really dont understand these people. One thing mostly is what the hell are they waiting with girls like Nancy or Carrie or Pam or Natasha? They should mix new girls with old models I dont accept any politics as that models decide themselves. This is nonsense, I rather say it is a strategy so that some viewers fall in love with these new girls, send tons of VIPs and maybe some day they will appear in a nightshow...Some of the sweetest ever never did AKA Candy. She was one of my favourites which Brianna never will be. As was also Maria.

to answer your nonsens:
one example for a self-deciding model is e.g. Sandra and some of the new model said that they won't / don't want do night shows.
maybe some of the models have private reason for their shifts because etv is just a way to earn some money for living and so they don't can or want to participate in night shows.
also it is possible to send VIPs in the daytime shows and we both remember the night show of Candy and how misplaced she was in it.
you should accept that the wish of a viewer isn't the main argument while making the schedule.

I really dont understand these people. One thing mostly is what the hell are they waiting with girls like Nancy or Carrie or Pam or Natasha? They should mix new girls with old models I dont accept any politics as that models decide themselves. This is nonsense, I rather say it is a strategy so that some viewers fall in love with these new girls, send tons of VIPs and maybe some day they will appear in a nightshow...Some of the sweetest ever never did AKA Candy. She was one of my favourites which Brianna never will be. As was also Maria.

It is nonsense if it is true that models decide when or if they will do the show. If rhis is true. But lately more critics go to stuff and absolutely hilarious camera operating. All doggy style action is ignored all the time, even if a model is doing a show that was requested by a VIP. Saying that anyway I must touch the problem of quality of models. Many of you say that some models are history and must be changed with girls like Natasha or Carrie etc...OK here I agree. But I ask you from the aspect of beauty; can Natasha or Brianna or Carrie be on same level as Regina, Donatella, Candy, Naomi, Alexis...? I dont think so. Maybe short time yes, but all in all quality of models is going down together with everything else. Still, when everything would be as it should be, they can still do a solid evening mixture of girls...For tonite I would sign Carrie, Nancy, Gia, Brona, Kally, Lia, Evah and Maschiara...Well, I will get one out of eight...Poor.

HvB wrote:where did you get that figure?
for which satellite?

Voyager 1?

No, but every contract is other. Longterm, shortterm or frequencysharing. Difficult.

where did you get that figure?
for which satellite?

@Brokingbull

<<Transponder costs can't be so high because channels like SexySat earn their money with only one girl per show.>>


about 150000€ per year for one transponder

there is still only five hours to the real show

Yasmine1 wrote:Well most what is happening in show I have written here several times in the past but it was always dismissed with comments that I am only speculating ...I am happy to see that one of this forum moderators is joining the choir ...
Now regarding the night show staffing I am sure that no one can impose a model to do night shifts but I am also sure that when ETV hires models (and it shouldn't be so hard) they specify this in the contract i.e the model is free and willing to do night shifts. So either they have very binding contracts with the veteran models or they don't care (both options I doubt) or they just are unwilling to do so due to their future plans ( I still think that ETV didn't give up the possibility to move to some sort of a pay service). Having said that it could be that this is an issue of money , I know it was discussed in the past but I find it hard to believe that each model is paid the same (although Molvenia roots are a socialism regime) and I am sure someone will respond that the cost of the model is peanuts compare to the satellite transponders cost as this is a must if you want to be on air so you cut expenses where its not a must - basic economics !!

Transponder costs can't be so high because channels like SexySat earn their money with only one girl per show.

But I can be wrong and SexySat makes enough money with one girl because they have much more viewers. Of course more viewers because of hot shows.

But if etv boss thinks that zigzag camera, 8 models and censorship is a better concept......then he must chase away hot models like Jaya, Angelina or Lana and try to save money with cheap students who don't want to undress.

Well done, boss!

bellerophon wrote:It's very kind of the casting manager to make sure that we get our fix of Aria, Lace, Sabrina, Lia, Lin, Amy, Kristina, Janine, Kia 3, 4 even 5 times a week on the night shows.

But wouldn't it be nice if Giselle, Kathrin and even Kally were given more equal treatment? And maybe, after recent shows, if Nancy, even Brianna, Natasha and Carrie were included too?

Of course it is up to the girls to sign up for these shows, but it must surely be more difficult - perhaps career suicide - for a new girl to be seen to tread on the (protected?) territory of the established "stars", so a little encouragement or invitation form the casting manager might be a nice idea......

Otherwise it looks just a little bit like nepotism. and that surely cannot be the case?

And to tell the truth, the same girls (more or less) every single night, is getting a bit boring. I would have thought that it would be in the interests of the more established models to appear a bit less often - to stop them going stale

Well most what is happening in show I have written here several times in the past but it was always dismissed with comments that I am only speculating ...I am happy to see that one of this forum moderators is joining the choir ...
Now regarding the night show staffing I am sure that no one can impose a model to do night shifts but I am also sure that when ETV hires models (and it shouldn't be so hard) they specify this in the contract i.e the model is free and willing to do night shifts. So either they have very binding contracts with the veteran models or they don't care (both options I doubt) or they just are unwilling to do so due to their future plans ( I still think that ETV didn't give up the possibility to move to some sort of a pay service). Having said that it could be that this is an issue of money , I know it was discussed in the past but I find it hard to believe that each model is paid the same (although Molvenia roots are a socialism regime) and I am sure someone will respond that the cost of the model is peanuts compare to the satellite transponders cost which is a must if you want to be on air so you cut expenses where its not a must - basic economics !!

watcher1 wrote:Nancy, Brianna and Carrie are representing the future of ETV. It give´s hope. May be we can see this beautiful girls soon in da night show.

...+ Natasha or Pam...don`t you think?

not only is the site missing since days. The cameras are not focused, and the sound is garbage.

somebody, anybody get to grips with it !!!

bellerophon wrote:And maybe, after recent shows, if Nancy, even Brianna, Natasha and Carrie were included too?

bellerophon wrote:And to tell the truth, the same girls (more or less) every single night, is getting a bit boring. I would have thought that it would be in the interests of the more established models to appear a bit less often - to stop them going stale

Oh, yes, it's time for a change. But is it possible? And we can only wait for developments.