Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
| Autor | Beiträge |
|---|---|
|
|
Post: #863 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 23.09.2017, 18:24 23.09.2017, 18:23 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
trust me it wouldn't be the first time i've been behind someone on the phones talking about that kind of diy - the sooner heckling is an option on these calls the better.
|
|
|
|
|
I tend to buy Gardeners weekly for its fascinating articles and not for its highly erotic pictures of the latest two stroke Black and Decker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what's just as funny is the idiots who are posting these shows on the likes of p###hub - for fuck's sake porn? If they think this is porn their bollocks must be bursting just looking at the top shelf in a newsagent. In fact they've probably not progressed beyond gardener's weekly yet.
|
|
|
|
|
No one as spoken about the sets for a while,well here goes. They are fucking ropey to say the least. The three main sets consist of a table/desk. One with pink walls, one with walls resembling the inside of a padded cell, and my old favourite, the one with the brick fucking wall paper. But basically all the same, fucking shite.
None of the sets mentioned are designed for the model to stand in, but the two sets in which the girl can show off her charms the best, are used a lot less, those being ,the alleyway and the shower. It is obvious the reason why, to much risk of a pussie slip. Just one more reason why we are now being asked to pay if you want to see any cunt. And why do you think the non- naked girls have been introduced? It is obvious that they are there to make nudity even more of an attraction. All the makers want is your money, nothing else. For fuck sake I wish people would stop fucking pandering to them, keep your money in your pocket, and get some early night's. And please don't think that it's the models being taken advantage of like some people are led to believe. These girls are every bit as complicit as the rest at taking the money from your credit card, and then no doubt having a good fucking laugh at you. |
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! bang babes. I forgot about that. It certainly was a serious competitior. But, like the Russians, Lybians or Syrians the men at the top decree they must be disposed of.
Nothing must stand in the way of pure profit. Business is business after all and we are only slaves, as are the poor girls who work on these channels so I find it hard to slag off individuals. The business model has changed, so to speak, over the last few years. What was hip last year no longer cuts the mustard. Even though we all know that the dish served then was ten times hotter, the market driven nature of twerking for profit has taken it on a tangent which leads it closer to its origins. Thus making profit by starting (almost) from its original position. (I think???) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #858 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 23.09.2017, 03:48 23.09.2017, 02:38 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Why is it that when the likes of Danni Harwood, Ashley Emma, Alice Goodwin and the tantric twins go naked the cameramen always films them completely naked for much of the time they're on screen?
  , yet babes like Lori, Sophie and Olivia  when they go naked we only get to see them fully nude for about 10 to 15% of the time they're on screen? I know who I would rather watch in the nude and it ain't those 5 I've formally mentioned. Why is it that some get preferential treatment in the naked exposure slot and others don't? My cynical brain asks is this because of services rendered or am I being too simplistic? Incidentally, I see that bore Mia Middleton is on yet again(yawn), no doubt keeping a firm grip on that bra so it never comes off! Hey luv, I don't know if you are aware, but this is supposed to be a night time adult channel where going topless and being fully nude are allowed, so come on and get that bra off and get your tits out for the lads for once, even if if your panties don't!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
the majority have convinced themselves that ofcom have tamed the channels when really it's the channels who have used ofcom as a convenient means to change the revenue - we all know the channels reported each other for breaches - mr and mrs average of suburbia are not sat up all night flicking through late night tv in order that they can be offended and nor are they likely to be making notes of 'glimpse of vaginal area at 1.36am nearly had a heart attack'. Bang babes was babestations serious competitor, do the maths.
|
|
|
|
|
As far as censorship is concerned we no longer need to worry about any watchdog keeping a close eye on proceedings. Because the route that the babechannels have taken is the route that says, "if you don't pay then you can't fucking play". It's the channels that say when you can see a glimpse of pussie not Ofcom.
All that can be expected from now on is the next variation of pervecam, just another way of teasing, whilst fucking idiots pay for the pleasure of their next wank. The old adage of the saying "you don't get owt for nowt" could never have been more true. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
maybe that bloke who documents every movement over there could add another section 'time spent phone waving/not talking'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #854 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 22.09.2017, 05:24 22.09.2017, 05:23 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Yes ofcourse mrmann you always need just a wee bit of balance from time to time when we are berating Babestation, Jenna too put on a fairly decent session aswell last night but on the whole it was still so far detached from its former glory. Tonight has been another total write off. I am sure that if she was allowed and the camera man also wasn't such a pussy that we may have been able to see something special from Sophie as she is one of them that if given the opportunity will tend to push the boat out further than the rest of them will. (Remember finger gate) I still think that the owner is on purpose trying his best to bankrupt this franchise as I think he probably has something to gain in all of this as the call statistics are bound to be down. Only a complete desperado or drunk beyond oblivion would give this channel a ring now.
|
|
|
|
|
Will give a slight pat on the back to the producer who let Lori and Danni go nude together last night. Sure it was super tame, but maybe this is a step in the right direction, with less censorship to come, one can hope.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't remember anything about last night shows. Did I see any of them, what girls were on. Did they happen to be bad or very bad? I honestly don't fucking know. I cant fucking remember. I guess that sums it up then, these shows are finished. Fuck em!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #851 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 19.09.2017, 19:02 19.09.2017, 19:01 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Tbh that Jasmine Marie was one of the better girls on last night considering the dreadful LDM, Lynda Leigh and Preeti were on, but these daygirls doing nightshows and not going topless takes the piss, as ever blame the mug callers/fanboys for that though
I don't care how good someone looks, how good a show she is putting on and how good she is on the phone, at the end of the day i wanna see tits, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeez, Scottishbloke, You and AniseedBalls are so bang on the money when it comes to the dire shows and models on these babe channels. I too smell a rat as I reckon they're winding down the shows and eventually there will be no more babe shows at all which obviously will please the moralizers who are 'worried' about the the nations' moral decline.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey as far as tits like hard balloons go, Lynda Leighs are very ''hard balloonish''. But please, i have nothing against a middle aged woman going under the knife trying to hang on to her fading beauty. But why the fuck do they want tits like they have, you have to remember that they have chosen those breasts. I cannot blame a woman if she wants to perk up sagging breasts. But someone please fucking tell me why do they choose what they choose, and to seem proud of them makes their choice even more ridiculous. Does no one tell them the truth?
|
|
|
|
