Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Autor | Beiträge |
---|---|
|
Post: #403 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 03.10.2016, 20:51 03.10.2016, 17:54 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
I replied earlier on the subject of the perv cams and rip off prices on the phone when chatting to the babes on screen. I want to make one slight correction in the fact that my reply should have been directed towards AniseedBalls as well as positive on that matter, so sorry for the mistake and confusion to all, especially to AniseedBalls
|
|
|
|
Every word you have stated on the subject of Babestation and their appalling use of pervcams and how they are ripping viewers off is absolutely and unequivocally correct in every aspect, positive.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
EJKKPT wrote:Obituary: I do seriously agree that we are almost at this point! |
|
|
|
AniseedBalls wrote:I'm not quite sure how this perve cam thing works. Does it mean that if you call a girl you will be allowed to view her perve cam as well as speaking to her. Or is perve cam a completely seperate thing and you have to pay extra for it? If the latter is the case then the audacity of the makers to ask for people to call them is un-fucking believable. The pervcam is a separate camera that most of the girls have focused between their legs. You don't have to be on the phones with them, you just have to pay the going rates. If you are on the phone then you can privately direct them what to do on pervcam. It is one way to get to see the models explicitly without the censorship of Ofcom. The problem is, of course, that the girls are still on TV, so the regular camera has to stay well clear. The pervcam concept can actually work, but it should only be for the girls who are willing to give guys value for their money. There should then be regular shows - without the pervcam - for the girls who are still very popular but do not wish to be explicit on pervcam. That way, there is something for everyone: the regular phone-in show, as well as the pervcam... At the moment the producers are allowing pervcam to kill the regular shows; and it surely will not be long now before this particular genre of show disappears altogether. |
|
|
|
Post: #399 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 03.10.2016, 11:43 03.10.2016, 11:43 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Obituary:
Babestation, on life support since 2013, died 2016, due to complications from pervcam-itis. RIP. ![]() |
|
|
|
Post: #398 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 03.10.2016, 11:47 03.10.2016, 11:40 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Lots of good looking girls last night but pretty much unwatchable as far as I'm concerned. No excitement or sexiness anywhere. So sad
![]() There was more excitement in 30 seconds of Lola on S66 than all night of all 3 BS channels. What's the point taking a girl with so much potential as Nicole Snow and sticking her on a table all night? |
|
|
|
|
Lutonbloke I don't think the legendary 2 for 1 session between Danni Harwood & Lucy Summers has ever been replicated. Infact that last great 2 for 1 session from Babestation marked something of a watershed moment as I seem to recall from that point onwards a decline the show. I think it was also the former Boss of Babestation parting gift because not long after that the ownership changed hands and its obvious now to see just how different the whole concept of the show has become.
Rallkin123 I 100% agree with you on Kerrie Lee, she is an absolute honey and a fantastic performer. Its a shame that she appears to have now completely left the shows ![]() |
|
|
|
Mmmm, Indian babe Priya in the nuddy and NO BLOODY, HORRIBLE STOCKINGS
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Oh, so true, Lutonbloke. We are singing from the same hymn sheet!
![]() ![]() |
|
|
Post: #394 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 03.10.2016, 03:20 03.10.2016, 03:20 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
We really need the proper 2-4-1s back, solo sessions just don't wow me anymore because the sets are crap and the camera work is rubbish, and why do most babes wear stockings? most people on the forums hate stockings yet the babes keep wearing them
![]() |
|
|
|
|
They've also done it with Kiwi babe, Beth when she got naked, too. Come back, Kerrie we need you more than ever now
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
I agree Rallkin123, its exactly the same with Ashley, but Ashley frustrates me more on the stocking front as she has really nice legs but always seems to keep them covered up. What's pissed me off tonight has been Lori's sessions and in particular the last one she did, all we seen from her was head and shoulders and boobs at a close up angle with no other part of her body being shown, just Lori permanently up close to the camera and to be honest I think she ought to take some of the blame for this shambles
![]() |
|
|
|
Strewth, you could knock me side ways, the lovely Nicole is nude, unfortunately she's wearing stockings which is a definite no no for me!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Post: #390 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 03.10.2016, 01:40 03.10.2016, 00:55 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Your endorsement of my description of Geri is much appreciated, Scottishbloke
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Post: #389 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 03.10.2016, 00:09 03.10.2016, 00:07 Re: Babestation - General Chat & DiscussionAniseedBalls wrote:"Forum of the banned", that's us. It's good to see that we can still have a proper discussion about the state of things in the adult tv world without an arsehole of a moderator putting a stop to it. So, "long may that remain". I don't know if anyone ever looks at other similar forums, like the one we used to belong to. If you do, then you will be aware of how fucking shite that particular one as become. The same contributors, saying the same things as they have always done, with never the need for a mod to raise his ugly head. I meant to say well said Aniseedballs ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|