| Autor | Beiträge |
|---|---|
|
|
i think losing 2 of their tv channels is going to cost them callers and they aren't rotating the girls on the channel that's left.
|
|
|
|
|
|
oocitoreoo wrote:Um maybe Charlie is on the pay per view?? Shes pretty damm popular and we wont be able to see it or even know about it. Also there will be one off shows featuring a line up of girls, we can either ring in to watch or pay a one off fee as I currently understand it. The pay per view is like an on demand service, but the shows will be better cause they can sort out different uniforms etc. At the moment there are 4 streams and only 1 is being shown on TV with Charlie Monaco, Bailey not doing much on another and the same story with Amanda Pickering and Morgan, so if there struggling for callers how will the XXX show fare. With it being Emma Butt i can,t see it doing much, as most have seen her many times for free, there will be a few callers but they will be her long term fans, and then the lines will go quiet, i am not saying this to attack or defend the channel, as some seem to want to, at the end of it all most people will only phone in when its Reede, Amanda or Lori are on, not the pornstars they have on as regulars. |
|
|
|
|
|
I can't say i'm a fan of this new graphic that keeps popping up on the webstream.It also seems the girls on the webstreams only aren't getting as many calls as they were on sky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
captaink wrote:who is on nude blue tonight anyone no ?Emma Butt. |
|
|
|
|
no idea but she's been on for 2 hours now
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gator8 wrote:i think most would be happy to pay a reasonable nightly or monthly charge.A nightly "ticket" I think would work but no way they are gonna do a monthly subscription. I think if they get people to call in (and I'm sure they will!!) they are gonna keep it this way. Maybe freeview if she got no callers. Coz the callers who call in will be able to see the show anyway while they talk to the girl. |
|
|
|
|
|
what has happened to the sky channels.ony 2 now and charlie is on both.
|
|
|
|
|
|
who is on nude blue tonight anyone no ? .they might even stand a chance of some idiots paying
if they put a schedule out.not me i don`t pay for something you can get elsewhere for free. |
|
|
|
|
|
BJ wrote:Most of the people who complain about it is people who never call the girls and only want everything for free. i think most would be happy to pay a reasonable nightly or monthly charge. |
|
|
|
|
well we will see
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #443 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 01.11.2010, 23:45 01.11.2010, 23:43 Re: Bluebird TV - General Discussion
Most of the people who complain about it is people who never call the girls and only want everything for free.
I rather pay a few bucks for some quality chick on the stream. BUTTTT, I'm not a big fan of Emma Butt.  [Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig] |
|
|
|
|
yes i meant that
|
|
|
|
|
oocitoreoo wrote:That is your opinion, there are plenty of people who will pay to see Reede or some other girl who is hardly ever showing her private parts. If that is too expensive then £1.50 to just see boobs is plenty too expensive for your tastes. Im not exactly loaded or anything but I feel better knowing that the money goes to the girls and not to the company outright. You can always join there forums and start talking to the girls that way. Do I smell a Chappers account? |
|
|
|
|
|
hey i'm not taking it out on the girls i'm just saying i don't think a fiver for just 10 mins viewing is acceptable
|
|
|
|
|
|
even if it's for the girl those prices are far to extortionate
|
|
|
|
Hallo Guest. Login | (Zeit: 22.12.2024, 19:29)
- Liveshow-TV.com
- » Liveshow-TV.com Forum
- » In Memoriam
- » BlueBird
- » Bluebird TV - General Discussion
I know theres loads of haters, but I can see the other channels going bust before Bluebird. maybe all channels owned by Cellcast, TVX and Bluebird.