Author | Posts |
---|---|
Look at the Wall, the last answer. they deny themselves.
once the exclusive was the show of freedom interactivity and creativity. models were happy for this...and now... "...There is no sense the models to do a show in the time available for conversations as well it is not reasonable to do a show when they are about to talk. The Exclusive shows are not a shows of orderings of Premium wishes, but they are a time of communication. Regards, ETV" well there are many of us who call for the so called interactivity during the show, These are the oldest and more reliable customers..don't you think ETV will loose the cream of their audience? |
|
|
|
|
[hidden link - please register]
this is what you can see during PS as a "not Logged" Naturally this is only a mistake and not a little trick to "cheating" some new viewers! |
|
|
I doubt it matters now since it looks highly likely that this thread will be closed soon, BUT I will point out for the record that when I 'joined' ETV club, minimum entry fee was 25 credits.
The invitation on their site was called 'why should I buy credits' and the answer they posted was (not verbatim) When you buy credits with your credit card we know that you are an adult. We need to know this because the exclusive web shows are showing material suitable for adults only. To watch the ELS does not cost any extra. Your credits are for sending messages etc if you wish. I considered it, I bought into it. They changed the rules a short time later and the ELS has been killed off. Those are plain facts. |
|
|
|
|
Watcher wrote:What a load of b*ll*cks ...Sorry again. I bought the credits just for watching the shows. And maybe an sms per month when there is a good show. ![]() ![]() ![]() What do you suggest? Or what do you like? Shall we all buy chocolate for hungry Karry? Or better Lillian in the hope she will explode? It's my decision how and when to drive my car in this or that direction. And when petrol becomes too expensive I drive less fast. At the moment I just watch ELS and wait for better times. I read here, they aren't around yet. |
|
|
|
I am out of this Topic.
Watcher and Friends can have a beer and applaud themselves. Never mind the Bollocks. God save the Queen. |
|
|
Watcher wrote:I am not a teacher. Well, as you were basically saying that the only way to do something is a stupid way... |
|
|
|
|
Chris26 wrote:Enlighten us on the alternative methods available, at the time, to watch them, then. I am not a teacher. I expect everyone to be intelligent enough to be able to find out the facts if they really want to know them ![]() |
|
|
Watcher wrote:fcn2011 wrote:At first the viewers paid the membership to view the ELS Show. Enlighten us on the alternative methods available, at the time, to watch them, then. |
|
|
|
|
fcn2011 wrote:At first the viewers paid the membership to view the ELS Show. What a load of b*ll*cks ... You confuse being fooled with being fools. It was clearly stated, and highlighted in this forum many times, that buying credits just to watch the Exclusive Live Show would be a stupid idea. Stupidity reigns supreme ... |
|
|
|
fcn2011 wrote:Why they don´t cut the Transponder Costs and make only Webshows? The end of FTA erotic call channels via Astra was announced 1.1.2012. I'm sure it will happen sooner or later. ![]() |
|
|
|
babacola7 wrote:lucifer70 wrote:Sorry if I insist, but complaining on this forum is good for nothing. This is obvious, do you believe that they publish negative posts? But they have read it and they know what you think about. If all the discontented would send an e-mail or a post of protest or criticism, constructive course not offensive, they would know for sure that what they are doing is wrong and should adapt to the demands of customers. No calls, no sms and no money for premium ..... guess who will win this round? Clients are always right in the real non molvanian world! ![]() |
|
|
|
fcn2011 wrote:At first the viewers paid the membership to view the ELS Show. Good comment and the only right conclusion!! If you have paid the beefsteak at the supermarket's cashbox the boss can't come thereafter and change it with cheap fish. That's exactly what etv has done. And I wouldn't call it management, they don't deserve this word. ![]() ![]() ![]() I have some words for you to chose, but be warned, you can't use them here and my english is also very bad: 1. crooks 2. cheaters 3. betrayers 4. thieves 5. ... Can someone complete the list of forbidden words? Maybe the mod can help out? |
|
|
|
CommanderData wrote:My humble opinion: So, reading in this thread tells me I'm the only one who thinks ETV TV "shows" were always and are continuing to be (apart from a few exceptions) something like sychronised swimming, rhythmic gymnastics or dressage......namely BORING BEYOND BELIEF. |
|
|
By the excellent monty python team (who eventually parodied or lampooned every sort of nonsense and institutional thinking) there was a sketch where, at a public meeting, everybody agreed with everything everybody else said. Funny because incongruous but completely pointless of course.
Here we come to exchange differing views, sometimes a bit heated. |
|
|
|
|
Hello you.
@ hanshel:. what's the name of the crap are you smoking?? Of OBCURANTISME!! On behalf of ideological presupposition: we are so confident of possessing the truth (and truth) than any other approach to reality seems unacceptable. And we have certainty so strong that even if the facts contradict them, we will deny the facts. @ << In Accordance with the general rules of censorship, Which Have Been Discussed Excessively here and at Other places of historical forum. >> SexStation?? Web UK, with uncensored, and why some model and others do not? @ << I challange you to build up uncensored webshow year in Iran, in Egypt or, or in China. >> Yes but .... they look, the web and the Satellite. The question is: "why do simple when you can make it complicated" General Forum Rules ... ??? dafr911. |
|