| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
I think that I saw in the insurance contract "Business trip" the original, and now I do not know which of the parts. The fact that someone did a remake I give more credit??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilsonsand wrote:....... Aha, they even know it in advance but nevertheless they keep on making us angry. And they don't want to change it? So ETV likes it to make the viewers angry? A weird philosophy and business model which can only be found between the southeast of Europe and the northwest of Himalaya.  
|
|
|
|
|
As regards the "soft" premiums they shouldn't charge for them if they are going to be so soft that it is mentioned in this forum it seems that the management at etv seem to want to destroy the channel completely !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well guys, tonight I saved on the Saya Premium Hour, but I spent my credits for Nancy. And what a show I got to see. Damn, damn, damnit !
What to say ... just one word .... 'WOW' It started out all slow, but then really picked up the pace with Nancy completely freaking out. Absolutely fantastic.  Thanks Nancy, very, very well done Slow |
|
|
|
|
|
I´ve read the wall and i can´t believe they still are unable to accept any critic.Two guys criticizes Ava premium show of yesterday. What they say: too soft, most of the time "the focus seemed to be more on the fruits and less on the model", "we can see more explicit shows from her in a normal Exclusive show than in a Premium Show" "it was a bad show" "Everything becomes mechanical, obvious, a bit grotesque".." to crush the fruit may be good for her skin, perhaps, but not erotic. "
ETV answers: "...We are not happy when our shows are being estimated by having or not having a model stripped and seeing or not seeing her private parts." sorry, nobody said anything about private parts... "We are always ready to hear and accept your remarks about a show that was emotionally poor or non-artistic, that was without an emotional charge or spirit but being methodically criticized for not showing a pussy - well, this is not something we consider as most important in our work." ...sorry, i can´t stop laughing...  and the best part: "We know that this stand will make many of our viewers angry. We don’t want to disappoint you but we kindly ask you NOT to see us as strippers and naked flesh" ...is this a joke??? models don´t do strips? there are not strips? there is no nudity in ETV? if they are not, why you allow all that sms requests sendind strips every night and the models do it? sorry? don´t you sell naked bodies? sorry? "The team will watch the recording of the show in order to see what happed and if there was a problem" It´s very simple: you offer shows bellow people expectations, because are poor, soft and pretentiously arthistic, and as the first guy said: even bellow of the level of you can get for free. Read and listen the customers would be nice indeed to watch again your own masterpiece to confirm you do emotional, artistic and spiritual shows. Keep that way, ETV. By the way, everytime etv receives a critic on it´s manipulated wall, they blame on the models, it´s something disgusting. And the last thing: Ava did yesterday a almost identical fruit show as she did some time ago: but with important differences: the old show was much better for many reasons: she was hot, naked, the star was her body and you could believe in the show, but yesterday the star was the fruit and It´s impossible to believe in the show, regardless of that dirty gestures in Ava face and hard expressions. In my opinion the show of yesterday was a complete joke. |
|
|
|
|
Ava says that she is soft model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ok, afternoon nothing happens, but what happened this morning with the hot girls like Ava?
Nothing as well? 
|
|
|
|
|
Eva also dares to show her tongue naked
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have archive Night Shower Show with Evah in latex bikini.
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's all that will happen this afternoon all very soft models might be worth them switching it off today maybe make the tv stream better just wasting it with very soft shows that can be done in Tv studio but what do we know we are just customers ! lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exclusive show in the fitting room today:
"hot" show of Brona: fully dressed 10x walking back and forth! "hot" show of Jessica: show the nude tongue. simply laughable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dreamlander wrote:Anyway.I'd rather a 'Shower Show' with no 'Shower' Surely that is just a Show then? How bizarre |
|
|
|
|
|
Wilsonsand wrote:Dreamlander, she was covered by veils the 50 % of the time of the show. That is not a liberal description, that is a fact. That is perfectly appropiated for a daytime show..... That a girl covered by viels is not acceptable in everyday life? i don´t know where you live, but where i live, in summer, some girls are even less covered than that.... You are,of course,entitled to your opinion but I still take issue with the above comment.She wasn't wearing panties at all during the show.It was only (not so) carefully tied veils that were covering her and it was evident frequently when she moved why this would not be allowed on the Day Show unless she remained like a statue to avoid any 'slips'.This was part of the allure and excitement for me,Tara excells at doing this,but like I said,we have different expectations.  I'm from the UK and,much as I'd like it,girls would not be allowed to walk around in such an insecure outfit in public,although a tiny bikini,probably showing just as much,would be.  Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
|
Dreamlander wrote:I'm not sure why you replied to my post about Tara's show here?because i wanted to talk about the show, not about Tara. Dreamlander wrote:Anyway.I'd rather a 'Shower Show' with no 'Shower' as,firstly, I do not like them and secondly,no amount of money lavished on a shower-based studio will ever make the software or encoding used to broadcast these shows be able to render water properly.So the shower part of the Shower Show is redundant for me and I'd rather watch the girl with the best picture quality possible doing anything other than disappearing into a vision of wet Lego bricks.I agree, but if you selll a shower show you must offer a shower show. Not 5/40 minutes shower show. Dreamlander wrote:As for Tara being 'dressed' for 50% of the show,that is a very liberal description on your part as what she was 'wearing' would not be acceptable in everyday life and as such was very sexy and erotic before she removed any of it.Dreamlander, she was covered by veils the 50 % of the time of the show. That is not a liberal description, that is a fact. That is perfectly appropiated for a daytime show.She did something like a poetry movements covered by veils, but that is not what i expect from premium shows. I expect hot shows, not poetry. You find it sexy and erotic? i find it a slow and a very long introduction, although it´s sexy or beautiful, but not hot. My opinion. If i buy a shower show and i find the model is 50% of the show covered by veils on the top of a plattform and away from water i think something fails sorry. she is beautiful? yes. That a girl covered by viels is not acceptable in everyday life? i don´t know where you live, but where i live, in summer, some girls are even less covered than that.... Dreamlander wrote:Your assimilation of nudity with eroticism again,no matter how veiled,is something I thought we had moved past,especially in reference to ETV.Tara is a very,very good proponent of the art of eroticism as all of her previous Premiums have proved.She invariably ends the show naked after taking us on a very satisfying and enjoyable journey and I think she is beyond criticism in these shows,in depth or with flippancy as your post was.That she finally got nude? of course she does! goodness she is not one more nun! I did not assimilate nudity with eroticism, i said "dressed and far of the water",because in a shower show could be admited being wet with that veils, but she didn´t. and i admit some dressed part because a part of eroticism introduction, but the half time, so long and completely out of any water proposal it seemed to me something that has nothing to do with the product they sold, thats what i was meaning. And i posted here because i don´t blame her, i blame that stupid artistic direction who is destroying the webshows with that soft performances and repeling and cheating (Melinda yesterday was a joke) a lot of customers, everyday more disappointed. You liked Tara show a lot? good, and that i would prefer a short introduction indeed half of the show of veils? good, different opinions. But the fact is they sold and promoted a shower show, and they offered only 5 minutes shower show, the other 35 it was a dry show. That´s what i was trying to say and that´s why the post is here and not in Tara´s thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dreamlander wrote:...So incredibly hot and sexy but all the time sweet,sensual,playful,feminine,classy,never dirty and totally breathtaking! You forgot one important thing which is also often missing in premium shows: She SMILED!! One of the most dangerous weapon of women.
|
|
|
