| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
I just see White with ice cubes in panties. But the pixels are back. The joy was short-lived. That means for me: They can do it better but they do not want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilsonsand wrote:dreamlander, the questions is ...how long? i hope it will be definitely, but this people is expert in destroying every little thing that works well... i hope this time they keep their hands off. Good news. I'm watching White's Premium hour too ( just for 'research' purposes  ) and the picture is still very good (in close-up). There is still some pixelation though on the wide angle shots because some genius has put 4 or more of those high powered LED cluster lights about 20cm off the floor pointed directly at the cameras and pulsing away!  There are some things that a higher bitrate just can't deal with and this is one of them!  Paradoxically, the close-ups now provide the better quality picture! Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
|
pepe84 wrote:Dreamlander . . are you watching Dakota right now? Hi Pepe. I have seen the Dacota & Suzy show today. Suzy did a hula-hup fast like a top. And there was no pixelation. I could not believe it. So they can do it yet. The question is: why not always?
|
|
|
|
|
|
dreamlander, the questions is ...how long? i hope it will be definitely, but this people is expert in destroying every little thing that works well... i hope this time they keep their hands off. Good news.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pepe84 wrote:Dreamlander . . are you watching Dakota right now? It's superb. All black background, Dacota, naked on the cycling thingy? and jumping on the trampette quite vigorously and the picture is brilliant. That would previously be unwatchable, they have definitely changed something...for the better for once. Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
Dreamlander . . are you watching Dakota right now?
I didnt buy the show, but I can see from the blurred opicture, that the lights are out again. If you can see it, what is the quality now? Also better as before? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
pepe84 wrote:Dreamlander wrote:. . . snip . . . I think there's something technical they've improved/switched on/turned up too because the moving camera almost always has pixellation and blocking no matter what the lighting conditions. Normally, the moving camera, zoomed-in is 'Lego' vision but it's been superb today, even with all the bouncing and hula hoops. Dacota and White's 'no panties' show the other day was well lit and well filmed but the picture quality on the moving, zoomed-in camera was unwatchable. I just hope whatever they are doing is something that can be permanent and not just a luxury to do with a more expensive, higher bitrate available only sparingly.Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
|
asoert wrote:hi what about jasmine two premium shows today ?? is it worth to watch?? did she showed her boobs?? Previously, on 24.08.2014, asoert wrote:hi guys what about jasmine show tonight is it worth to watch?? did she showed her boobs or just a hand bra???? And earlier still, on 21.08.2014, asoert wrote:what about jasmine premium today is it worth to watch??? did she showed her boobs?? thanks Rather than repeat this question each time 'Jasmine' has a 'special' show, take it as a "no". If it does happen I'm sure someone will notice and mention it here so that you can get the video
|
|
|
|
|
|
asoert wrote:hi what about jasmine two premium shows today ?? is it worth to watch?? did she showed her boobs??I think she is everyday more soft than the day before  , and unfortunately without water she is ... The answer to the second question is: no |
|
|
|
|
hi what about jasmine two premium shows today ?? is it worth to watch?? did she showed her boobs??
|
|
|
|
|
Dreamlander wrote:. . . snip . . . with enough light the worst technical issues suddenly are gone . . at least when no water, smoke or glitter stuff is involved, not only in the webshows, also on TV Would be nice if the shower cabin would be fixed next, dont like the dark one . . .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very good Premium from Suzy & Dacota just now! FYI, completely naked, both of them and not shying away from the cameras at all, they seemed confident and relaxed. Also, it was very well filmed, the studio was bright and although there was lots of movement, there was almost NO pixellation or blocking, which, as it should be, I didn't realise until the show had finished.
15 minutes where your only focus is the girl/s and their performance. Dreamlander EDIT: Same again with Melanie's Premium. Lot's of movement, twin hula hoops and trampette jumping and NO pixellation or blocking. Whatever buttons they are pressing or bitrate they are using, I hope it continues and perhaps then, the message option can return to the Premiums as, from what I've heard, the majority of 'abusive' messages were about technical problems and not towards the girls themselves. If they were towards the girls then these members could simply be banned allowing the rest of us to keep using this service, which I enjoyed immensely.
|
|
|
|
|
Sellena did her show well but the camera work was too conservative . If they gave me my message button back I`d have it worn off tonight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vector wrote:The thick Ellie's back. i agree with you, there are 9-10 minutes useless, with the models dressed, and i doubt very much if those are really erotic shows or just fit, at least until the girls lose some clothes. But i want to be fair, and there is something ETV has improved: the lighting. No Mordor anymore, and that´s a good thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
The thick Ellie's back.
They might have been better to stay on vacation. The best far away in any desert.  Now that she is back, the shows are bad again. I saw Jasmine and Roshana. They have already done much better shows. They will not earn much money on me this week. |
|
|
