Author | Posts |
---|---|
shnaps7 wrote:Johnbirracchio wrote:Dear friends, -- to stay without, may refresh you for new things in live. -- |
|
|
|
Scottishbloke wrote:kennyboy2012 wrote:LMAO Theres a 3rd option, I can point out that I've been quite critical of ETV for quite some time. You could say 'the rose tinted spectacles were thrown away around 7 months ago', but I wouldn't expect you to notice, it might get in the way of your ongoing tirade. Other than that, feel free to carry on posting your comments about me, I'm flattered that I have such an influence on you ![]() |
|
|
|
|
kennyboy2012 wrote:LMAO Yet again Kenny, you have missed the point as always. Not one member has ever blamed you for the demise of ETV. What we have tried to do numerous times is to ask you to take your rose tinted spectacles off, take a step back and look at what was actually unfolding in front of your very eyes but you denied ETV ever having an issue and fully backed them all the way. You told us all that the exclusives wouldn't be the end of the show and even attempted to drum up business telling other members to stump up and pay when we could quite clearly read from the reviews that the money they were charging wasn't worth the paper that prints them. Now that ETV has finally bitten the dust will you at long last concede that your point of view was wrong. You might surprise us all but this is the most likely thing you'll do. 1 - Ignore this post. 2 - Come back and try your best with some smug comment. In all the time you have posted on this forum Kenny not once have I ever been given the impression that you have the capability to actually argue your point with any sort of reasoning, justification or diplomacy. We all know that you have only been watching ETV since the failed experiment on SKY UK which was in 2015 and up until then your knowledge of the show or what went before was non existent yet you have still managed to tell those who have been with the show since the very beginning that there opinion's were wrong. Have you ever heard of the phrase, you're chirping very loudly for a new canary. You'd do well to take this onboard before you type in your response ![]() |
|
|
|
Johnbirracchio wrote:Dear friends, Yes friends ... change a habit, it takes years. The habit of replacing us happiness, patience - everything else. I have a similar situation - but to make a decision to a new habit, need a one moment...or is stay with the old ? ![]() |
|
|
Dear friends,
for me to leave the TV by ETV was a big mistake. I preferred watching the program on TV, I did not want to log on to the Internet, however I was signed up as a VIP. Kind regards. Johnbirracchio |
|
|
|
|
longshanks wrote:
Angelina is/was the problem with. ETV. A question: What is Angelina actually not responsible for when old/new ETV? Primitive it won't do. Look on the Internet who is the owner of ETV. These people are responsible for the crap, the ETV has produced lately. |
|
|
Angelina is/was the problem with. ETV.
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ETV produced Premiums and this is what I remember from the screen behind like it was in the WFF. Many complained amateur cameraman , camera man zoom in, get rid of the director, no smoke and so on.
Was it at that stage ETV had thoughts to quit tv shows But the internet shows were not up to it so they bring down the level of the tv shows. Now tv shows gone and left with internet, very soft shows reliant on few customers, it was not possible to survive. Did anyone expect it to survive with out more credit,for what soft shows, they treat viewers like idiots. I think they should extend their holiday break for eternity. |
|
|
|
|
Joker1305 wrote:BornExtreme wrote:...Actually I doubt. I suppose without the webshows they probably had shut down even earlier, they pushed the web shows because the TV shows didn't bring enough revenue. Yes, the TV business wasn't like it was four or five years ago, but when they made Nightshows in some good levels, they received a very good number of requests and for the 90% there were true. Think how many requests (and calls) they could had if they did great shows... So I think their core business was still TV shows, because it is also more easier to acess. I'm not against webshows, because in this years it's normal to have a website, but ETV had badly managed it, giving it too much attention at the expense of very little attention to FTA shows. For example, look at what the newspapers do. They give a preview of their articles on their website, but to read the whole article you have to buy and read the newspaper. |
|
|
|
kennyboy2012 wrote:BornExtreme wrote:logic wrote:JKO12 wrote:shame on kennycuckboy and slowmindfox.. hell for you!LOL thats easy, propably something like this: 1. Give out money for free. 2. wait until he gets a profit. 3. Blame his failure on you |
|
|
BornExtreme wrote:logic wrote:JKO12 wrote:shame on kennycuckboy and slowmindfox.. hell for you!LOL LMAO Yeah, those of us that spent a lot of money on ETV, its all our fault, as opposed to those that always claimed to never spend a penny? Oh please. so we shouldn't have spent any money then, and left ETV to survive on what, good will and scotch mist ? so then, let me know when you write your first business plan, I could do with a good laugh ![]() |
|
|
|
|
BornExtreme wrote:...Actually I doubt. I suppose without the webshows they probably had shut down even earlier, they pushed the web shows because the TV shows didn't bring enough revenue. For me the main reason is their ignorance and arrogance: -They made shows for the pleasure of their directors, not for the pleasure of their customers -They treated good customers like shit -They didn't respect their girls So they lost good girls and good customers and couldn't recover these losses. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
logic wrote:JKO12 wrote:shame on kennycuckboy and slowmindfox.. hell for you!LOL The post of JKO12 is certainly exceeding, is not only for them if ETV is now a deadman walking, but is also true that Kenny like other people who have spent a lot of credits in many internet shows in the last years, have some responsabilities in the tv channel closure. If the web project wasn't funded and was a failure, maybe ETV would still be alive in TV because they had no other options to keep on. |
|
|
|
JKO12 wrote:shame on kennycuckboy and slowmindfox.. hell for you!LOL Yes, without kenny and slow ETV would make still free hot shows on TV. For sure! |
|
|
|
All I'm going to say with regards to the demise of ETV is that I seen it coming a long long time ago. The move to the internet could have worked had they embraced the free market and made their channel available on this [hidden link - please register] for example but ETV obviously knew better than the rest of the businessmen who run the other channels who at least are upfront that the channels are porn but ETV still maintained all the way to the bitter bitter end that they were above the rest, they were art and as such the average punter on the street wasn't worthy to access a FTA webstream. Members only I'm afraid
![]() With regards to the views and opinions expressed over the years on this forum it's fair to say that we've all had our differences. All that said and done ETV will be a huge loss but its had a good 12 year run which is more than most channels manage. I shall continue to re-upload previous shows from my archive as a lot of the links are now dead in order that those who missed out the first time downloading the files will now get a second opportunity. Lastly as always a massive thank you to all who have uploaded content of ETV over the years. Your commitment to the cause hasn't gone unnoticed and for that you have my gratitude ![]() |
|