Author | Posts |
---|---|
Scottishbloke wrote:Although on the + side at least Babestation unlike Studio66 have the balls to show the babes in all there glory, Jennifer Jades session is currently being ruined all because the cameraman and producer are pussies, I really hope that BS resign her, afterall Lolly Badcock has long fucked off and correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't that the real reason as to her leaving this channel in the first place Lolly works for Babestation behind the scenes now and is married to one of the bosses so doubt your hopes will be met! |
|
|
|
|
As it currently stands Babestation is the only channel left now that is still worth giving fuck about, apart from the odd night here and there on S66 I've more or less given up on that one. Tonights show has been exactly what I expected for a Friday night, fucking abysmal. Just one big snore fest from start to finish, no movement, just nothing in the way of anything that is remotely erotic, as much as I like Madison, tonight she has stayed in the exact same position for hours, it would be all fine and well if it was an art class she was posing for but this is Babestation
![]() Weekends used to be good when BS and the others were at their best, not anymore as these nights are usually the lamest of the week ![]() |
|
|
But Studio 66 are no better or no worse than anyone else when it comes to the fear of showing too much. I cannot sit watching my personal favourite Alice, without ranting and raving at the person operating the camera when he insists on not showing Alice below the waist for big chunks of her screen time. And what is more pitiful than the fake masturbation and climax scene. once again the girl cut off at the waist.
For me the sight of a scantily clad girl in view from head to toe is a far better option than not seeing all this ''so-called'' nudity below the camera angle. But Alice is never ever nude,so why is she usually cut off at midriff anyway? And another thing. The photographs they flog on air. why do they say that they are open legged showing all? When all i can make of them behind the badge is the model wearing her full costume including her knickers. Even ''the producer'' with is censoring thumb, cant hide the fact that these girls are far from naked. But still some idiots buy them. Fucking unbelievable. |
|
|
|
|
Although on the + side at least Babestation unlike Studio66 have the balls to show the babes in all there glory, Jennifer Jades session is currently being ruined all because the cameraman and producer are pussies, I really hope that BS resign her, afterall Lolly Badcock has long fucked off and correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't that the real reason as to her leaving this channel in the first place
![]() |
|
|
|
quiquems wrote:The fucking producers of the channels love the FUCKING boxes So now they're ruining the streams too? Good job BS ![]() Wankers!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I swear, soon we'll be watching the girls in the little window on the right-hand side, the rest of the space will be one BIG OSG
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() [hidden image - please register] [hidden image - please register] Fucking ridiculous ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
AniseedBalls wrote:This is my last say on the subject of what Caty Cole's voice sounds like. Nowhere have i mentioned peaodophilia in anything I have wrote. What i have said is ''some men like young girls'', Does that make them Peadophiles? It seems like some of you who have taken part in the Caty Cole voice debate seem to think they are. But beware, it may seem to some that you protest to loudly. Lets not blow this out of proportion mate, I get what you're saying that you don't like the tone Caty uses when talking down the mic, fair point and if you'd just made that point initially instead of bringing a lot of weird reasons as to why then I'm sure most members would say fair enough that's your opinion which you're entitled to. Such as some members will say that they wish Lori would stop yelling down the mic as much, other than the reason of well it's just a bit much, just tone it down a few notchs would you please ![]() Lastly I wish you a Merry Christmas aswell as all the rest of the members on the forum ![]() *Legal Disclaimer - My sincere apologies if I have somehow taken on the role of a backseat moderator* ![]() |
|
|
|
Post: #180 Last edited: 11.12.2015, 18:46 11.12.2015, 18:45 Re: Babestation - General Chat & DiscussionAniseedBalls wrote:But beware, it may seem to some that you protest to loudly. no i think it's just you mate, but you're slightly unhinged and confused so i'm not too worried. ![]() |
|
|
This is my last say on the subject of what Caty Cole's voice sounds like. Nowhere have i mentioned peaodophilia in anything I have wrote. What i have said is ''some men like young girls'', Does that make them Peadophiles? It seems like some of you who have taken part in the Caty Cole voice debate seem to think they are. But beware, it may seem to some that you protest to loudly.
|
|
|
|
|
With regards to how Caty speaks down the mic I personally have no issues with it, I just wish that she would buck up her ideas when it came to the actual performances she delivered, a wonderful performer last year at this time, now all she does is go through the motions with a camera that is so far away from her that its really difficult to feel any sort of connection anymore.
As much as I am a fan of Lori Buckby I just really wish she'd stop shouting down the mic so much as it's probably the only leaf that she could take out of Caty's book. With regards to last nights show far too many pointless 2 for 1's ruined it for me, unless the girls are able to interact with each other in the same manner that they did when BS1 had the Dutch licence then its a waste of time in my opinion. On the + side it was great to see Danielle Maye on the unleashed show last night, that to me was a real surprise ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Instead of knocking the girls I think we should have a go at the incompetent management at BS. I get fed up with all the silly messages they feel they have to add to the OSG's and suggest that they may be committing fraud. They are obsessed with girl callers and are trying to persuade us to spend money on making a call for something that is not there. How can we listen in to the girl caller when the girl on screen is using the mic in an attempt to get us to call. They excelled themselves the other night when the message was "The girl on screen is your Option 1. Call her now" when at the time there were actually 2 girls on screen. If they are to persist with the silly messages then at least they should check to see that the messages are relevant
|
|
|
|
Whyare people here going on so much about caty coles voice?
That is her natural voice and accent (scottish) and the reason i say this is because every video and blog she has made from the studio66 website to her own website (misskink.com) she speaks exactly the same way. Remember she is a small girl (4'9'') and sometimes small people have small voices, nothing wrong with that. At the end of the day she is a stunning girl who has given some great shows in the past years. Can we move along now chaps and get on with posting something valid. |
|
|
|
|
On the show from last night the girls tried a new stunt, this was called a 'tag team quick fire'
At the moment when a girl has finished on her telephone call then one other girl has made a swap to take the same telephone and recieve the next call. Then they swap again and once again but all this time one is talking with a microphone inside a small box in the screen (this is on the top of the other girl and it blocks her face and more). My idea is this is a stupid game. ![]() Some can say it is a good point that it is a new idea and they can try new things. Yes I think this too, so try again for more luck. |
|
|
|
Post: #174 Last edited: 10.12.2015, 09:21 10.12.2015, 09:17 Re: Babestation - General Chat & DiscussionAniseedBalls wrote:Saoirse, Please will you grow up and realise that some older men, not all, but a fair proportion are attracted to younger girls. but you didn't use the term 'yonger girls' did you. you said 'the voice of a whimpering child' surely you realise the difference in these statements. one is reasonable, the other is insulting. personally, i think the voice she uses is intended to make her sound sexier and not to make her seem 'younger' as you imply. |
|