| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
HvB wrote:Because you mention it three times in one post and use it as reasoning why it shouldn't be discussed. So what you are doing now …. Ruining the whole discussion …..or just entertaining …. In all cases ......If you really want to denounce my claims about the failure of the web project ….and prove the validity of yours ....then come in the right thread and start argument about this ……..And leave the current discussion for another complements which comes in the same line with the main idea . At least this would give you the chance to build a clear and honest discussion …..instead of .." Mix things up and lowering the whole argument into bullshit " . |
|
|
|
|
|
zxcv wrote:And why do you want to change the course of discussion into another completely different direction . I am not discussing whether it is failed or not . ( if you want to discuss why it is failed we could do that in anther thread ) Because you mention it three times in one post and use it as reasoning why it shouldn't be discussed. So I would like to know the validity of the reasoning before I consider thinking about the rest. If the prerequisite fails or is at least not reliable, there is no reason to waste a thought about the conclusion. |
|
|
|
|
|
HvB wrote:Why is it failed? And why do you want to change the course of discussion into another completely different direction . I am not discussing whether it is failed or not . ( if you want to discuss why it is failed we could do that in anther thread ) Now I am specifically speaking about the huge space which is given to discuss the daily outcome for that web shows …..which by the way has saved a huge huge space for the endless discussion ....and which has influenced the mood inside the whole forum The point I raised now ...The live forum is all about..... The TV Shows and the TV shows only …..The discussion and links for the TV shows only ..... As I said before since the links for the web shows are completely banned to be published in the live forum ….Then there is no need to let the discussion grow to that.... huge unbelievable level. For sure it would be impossible to completely banned the discussion around web shows ....but at least reducing it to the lowest level isn't impossible at all .....and quite frankly it should come in the first priorities......in order to regain the good atmosphere all over the forum . |
|
|
|
|
|
zxcv wrote:After nearly one year of the beginning….we can see that the discussion... around ....about ….belong to .....the New Failed Web Project of ETV....... has completely dominated the pages and threads of ETV section . Why is it failed? I see a lot of words and a constant repeat of the thesis, but I also see a complete failure to give any reasoning why it is failed. At least it seems interesting enough. that even the ones wanting to make us belive, that this project will end the world, know obviously pretty well what is going on in the shows and post about how embarrassing it is (guess that's why they watch it ...). |
|
|
|
|
|
After nearly one year of the beginning….we can see that the discussion... around ....about ….belong to .....the New Failed Web Project of ETV....... has completely dominated the pages and threads of ETV section .
What is more strange is that you find some members .....who gave all their attention , efforts and time in the forum ( nearly on a daily basis ) ....trying to convince us..... about how good was the web show of today....and how the model X or Y were excellent in their performance ..... I don't know if I am justified in this stance or not …. But I believe that the discussion around this project has changed the mood inside the forum and focus the attention more and more in this failed project . Since the links are not available to be published in the live forum.........Then why we let the endless and senseless discussions around the web project grow to that huge level .... I think in order to regain some of the normal mood again of the forum ....We should reduce the space which is allowed for this kind of discussion to the lowest possible level all over the forum . Otherwise .....we will continue to give ETV the chance to enjoy the free publicity in the live forum for their failed project in the web . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Watcher wrote:Oh, she's so cute ... you wanna met her? need some help? ;) you can use the car, aeroplane, train or ferry to met her. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outside wrote:Slowfox wrote:Unfortunately the year 2013 starts as the year 2012 ended. no complaint, just a statement. but thanks your reply. |
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:Unfortunately the year 2013 starts as the year 2012 ended. Fanboys do exactly the same, so it isn't wise to complain about that. |
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately the year 2013 starts as the year 2012 ended.
further I realize the lobbies are still working as not the quality or contents of a comment makes people hit the like button but only the author  Slow |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr_Niceguy wrote:You know people, I was just thinking the problem of the forum is that it is a man's world. I think it would greatly benefit from more women presence An interesting concept, which I agree with since most areas of life benefit from a woman's presence  ...but, a question ... Are you sure it is not already true? Maybe being drunk to think of it is a pertinent point 
|
|
|
|
|
You know people, I was just thinking the problem of the forum is that it is a man's world. I think it would greatly benefit from more women presence
How this can be accomplished, I have no idea (yes I am quite drunk )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angelika wrote:Slowfox wrote:looking at the present development in at least 2 threads, believe it will be an interesting and funny day again in the forum. apparently the view at the big picture changes substantially when making use of a small electronic device, available only for credits taken by some greedy thieves, and the name of the girl and her legs to zoom in. rrrrrr
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angelika wrote:...So you know the whole picture, Good laugh But aren't you the one who always complains about too old models at ETV? And comparing Slow with Karry's biggest fan, don't you mix up something? A little too much confusion for someone who claims to know the big picture. Or is the big picture that confusing? Regards Joker |
|
|
