Author | Posts |
---|---|
Just seen the on screen banner for UK channels. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Bobsyouraunt wrote:I noticed today on one of the adult channel's freeviews (unencrypted, rated 15), breasts were exposed a lot, there was actual male/female intercourse and even a (albeit very brief) pussy flash. Why is this acceptable on a program rated 15 and not on the 18 rated babeshows?? Absurd isnt it? The regulator says that as an advert for a sex channel it has content. The public attitude survey a few years back found that this kind of freeview was as acceptable to their sample group (including penioners) as mainstream BBC drama with sex scenes. The channel is clearly labelled, there are no surprises, it was late at night and the channel could be blocked. The regulator inferred that as an advert it served a clear purpose other than sexual arousal. They didnt have the nerve to show a clip from a free babe show. The rules say that if exactly the same content were shown on a free channel for fun (instead of in a free clip on a pay channel) it would result in a ban or a heavy fine. Meanwhile reputable public sector broadcasters can show Saw and Hostel without any restrictions from 10pm. Female wrestling can be seen in the afternoon. Female boxing is shown occasionally. Then theres cages fighting. Presenters on babe channels arent even allowed to use sexy language or gestures. Meanwhile I have book marked Geordie Shore for tomorrow night (MTV 11pm). (For those of you innocents out their, its a reality show featuring people talking about vomiting over themselves, passing out on the lav and generally behaving in, er, interesting ways. And thats just the women.) Thanks to everyone who has voted and confirmed the email. Its up to 179 votes, 16th on the Dept of Culture Sport and Media page. Thats good but it wont make MPs sit up and take notice. Also it is 3 votes behind a petition to give the regulator more power,effectively ending press press in the UK. Any publicity on other media or social networking would be much appreciated. Its about freedom to show sexual content with reasonable protection for kids and the easily offended but its also about freedom and curbing an out of control TV regulator. |
|
|
|
Now reached 167
|
|
|
|
The signatures are now up to 152 so still steadily climbing
Thanks to all who have put there names to this so far. |
|
|
|
I noticed today on one of the adult channel's freeviews (unencrypted, rated 15), breasts were exposed a lot, there was actual male/female intercourse and even a (albeit very brief) pussy flash. Why is this acceptable on a program rated 15 and not on the 18 rated babeshows??
|
|
|
|
I doubt if this petition will have any impact but I guess it's the only thing UK citizens who want to decide for themselves what to watch can do.
I do know for a fact that the babechannels themselves are probably one of the main sources of complaints, targetting the competition. From a very reliable source I know that elite for example has been recording the other channels and has been ratting them out to ofcom when the rules were broken. I'm sure they got the same love from the other channels though as they are now one of ofcom's favorite targets and they had to tame down to sleep inducing levels to prevent trouble. So it's dirty politics all over the place in the UK , the only thing that isn't dirty are the shows. Crazy victorians. |
|
|
|
vappiano68 wrote:Good news about new signatures? The number of signatures now is 132 thx vapp for reminding me. |
|
|
|
Good news about new signatures?
|
|
|
|
brudgon wrote:dazaman wrote: Sadly brudgon its for people who are from the UK, but thx for your support |
|
|
|
ops i can't needs address and city how can i help you?
|
|
|
|
dazaman wrote: i'm not an english member but i'm very proud to help english members for strongest adult tv....i'm going to vote for you guys |
|
|
|
signed ages ago (when thread was first started, just forgot to post )
@HvB technically, Daz can bump this thread, the rule you quoted says about bumping your own threads / requests, and this thread was created by eccles sorry for being a pedantic c___, but thats what happens when i'm around Edited, spelling, no reason for me to say daz can bum this thread typing skillz fail! |
|
|
|
110 now
|
|
|
|
dazaman wrote: Luckily you decided against bumping, because the rules say: Admin wrote:DO NOT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|